New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
87
flat earth- (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Shivananda on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +87Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
201 comments:
17
WhatWouldMountainDew on scored.co
1 year ago 17 points (+0 / -0 / +17Score on mirror ) 1 child
"Dunking on flat earthers is like dunking on a juggalo"

-Sam Hyde
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Doesn't mean I'll stop either.
15
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 15 points (+0 / -0 / +15Score on mirror ) 1 child
Flat earth was dead for literal millennia before kookifiers brought it back to discredit traditionalists and sceptics. Hiding the earth being flat benefits the jew in no way, especially since its easily proven otherwise. I'm more suspicious of Heliocentrism, Darwinism, and Old Earth Chronology, which actually do benefit the jews (or more specifically, their Freemasonic Soyence worshipping lackeys), than I am of the earth's shape.
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> Hiding the earth being flat benefits the jew in no way, especially since its easily proven otherwise.

And what if, for the sake of discussion, it were NOT easily proven otherwise and instead just widely **believed** to be?

Can you really imagine NO way that the world not being the shape we believe it to be (and thus all maps being wrong/incomplete) would benefit those who knew otherwise? Again, hypothetically for the sake of discussion.

> I'm more suspicious of Heliocentrism, Darwinism, and Old Earth Chronology, which actually do benefit the jews (or more specifically, their Freemasonic Soyence worshipping lackeys), than I am of the earth's shape.

All of those things heavily influence worldview - which is to say, the creation myth and philosophy of the culture which accepts/believes them… The earths believed shape certainly influences those same things - though I agree, seemingly to a lesser degree.

When I muse upon these ideas, I often think of a quote attributed to Lyndon Johnson… (paraphrased); The ultimate weapon in warfare is not a weapon, but a position.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
The only *possible* benefit the earth being flat I can think of would be if the jews know of other landmasses and want to conceal them to hide either people or resources, but they could just as easily do this without obscuring the entire shape of the planet.
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
That’s certainly a reasonable possibility.

As you say, you **could** do that without obscuring the entire shape of the world. However, it might be a pretty good way to keep people from trying to travel outside a particular circular enclosure/encampment/prison.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
> However, it might be a pretty good way to keep people from trying to travel outside a particular circular enclosure/encampment/prison.

Flat earth would be better for that though. If you believe the earth is round, youll be more likely to explore it, but if you believe its flat, you fear falling off an edge
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> Flat earth would be better for that though
> If you believe the earth is round, youll be more likely to explore it, but if you believe its flat, you fear falling off an edge

If you believe the earth is any known/established shape, finite, and already thoroughly explored … there is not much reason to further explore it.

Many of the flat earth proponents I have met think of the earth as a “realm”/“plane”. Much like modern conceptions of the universe, it is not imagined/conceptualized to be finite.

Largely, the idea of “an edge” to fall of is a contrived strawman which no one earnestly holds. (historically as well as contemporarily)

Edit: On further musing, and further supporting my last statement above, I think the flat worldview (with an “edge” to fall off of) would actually endlessly encourage exploration, and perhaps this is the reason for the persistent strawman mockery of “fear of falling off”. Just imagine for a second if an edge to the world existed to travel to, and it were common knowledge. We would all want to go there! It would be like Everest (perhaps JUST like it, and for the same reasons), or Niagara. It would likely be a pilgrimage and vacation destination.
11
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror ) 5 children
I just want objective proof, not random clips on YouTube provided by undocumented government sources. All the would have to do is attach a GoPro to the top of a rocket and face it towards the sky, show it actually traveling past the moon and you’d shut up a lot of FE arguments.

but the problem is FE is government controlled opposition to make any questioning of the scientific dogma about space or government programs look retarded
13
Ecl1pseGST on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 1 child
You can tape these people to an airplane and fly up till the curve of the Earth is blatantly obvious and they will still come up with some convoluted excuse. They're too retarded to save.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
I don’t think so. I think you’ve got a substantial portion of FE “followers/believers” that understand they’re being lied to. It’s legal for the government to propagandize its citizens: see Smith-Mubdt Modernization Act of 2012, The Hall of Cost, The 2020 Election, etc.

It’s incredibly easy to prove extra-orbital space travel and there’s still no proof.
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
You will never have a photo due to the limitations on the eyes. That's why that nasa kid said "it has to be photoshopped"
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
But I didn’t say anything about a photo.

What I want is livestream footage, with audit trail from the device, completely unedited, showing forward motion (just like a dash cam), recording forward momentum (driving forward), leaving the earth (not suborbital satellite crap), and then you can turn it around and show whatever: shape of the earth, stars, the firmament or lack of, stars, whatever.

But the problem is they can’t and don’t.
JohnTorrington on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
You'll never get it because NASA/Space X are a bunch of lying kikes. Just look at any "real earth footage" it looks faker than the space from those Avengers movies.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
My favorite are all the nasa photos of astronauts whimsically looking at Earth through the porthole but never the sun or moon
JohnTorrington on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Lol its all so fake and only dumbasses still blindly believe the feds. Do I have all the answers of course not but I do smell a rotten lie.

I bet that retard Purestevil has no answer to why they haven't sent men "back to the moon" in so long or why they have to photoshop all the photos.
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The reason the can't because there are limits to viewing in this realm shown by piccards experiments. You can't get high enough. It's called intelligent design.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
“You can’t get high enough”.

Sounds exactly like a firmament as laid out in Genesis.
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
The firmament has more evidence for its existence than all of NASA's $cience.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
Why bother?

You can prove the shape of the Earth using thousand year old techniques.

If you can't, you need to learn some math.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
That’s neat. So anyways whenever they get around by providing direct evidence and not some NASA fakery that would be great.
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Agreed
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> You can prove the shape of the Earth using thousand year old techniques.

This is a popularly taught misunderstanding.

You can ESTIMATE the diameter of the world ASSUMING it is spherical (only in conjunction with further assumptions) like the ancient Greeks did. But you can’t in any way “prove the shape of the earth” by merely assuming its shape…
wellallright on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Dont recall the title, but a group made a rocket, attached a few go-pros and launched it up, dont recall how high it got but shows the curvature prior to it falling back and landing in northern Nevada.
The vid isnt anything disproving flat earth but instead them developing and sending up the rocket BUT you get a great video and view
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yeah I think I’ve seen what you’re talking about. I want to see something leave earth COMPLETELY with uninterrupted footage on it. It boggles my mind that as many satellites as we supposedly have in outer space that they don’t have any sort of live streaming publically available on a single one
Ecl1pseGST on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
NOAA's NESDIS, SkyFi, NASA Worldview, aren't quite live video but are consistently updated photos. A ride in a Cessna is cheap if you need some proof to sleep well at night...
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Nope. That’s not what I asked for. I said continuous live streaming of a front-facing camera attached to a rocket showing it leave waaaay past earth, not suborbital.
Ecl1pseGST on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Why would you need that?
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
A Cessna can fly into outer space? Where do you people come up with this cope?
Ecl1pseGST on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
It can fly high enough to blatantly see the curve of the earth.
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You've learned nothing??!?!??!?!!!
Also both sphere AND flat are government controlled opposition. How are you all so retarded. It really make you government controlled........or reeeeeetarded
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Hahahaha I support spheroid earth theory
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
With less evidence than the flat earthers.......okay..
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
It’s a joke dumbass
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
K
removed 1 year ago 10 points (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror ) 10 children
25
Shivananda on scored.co
1 year ago 25 points (+0 / -0 / +25Score on mirror ) 6 children
because of the fact that the sun settles below the horizon..so it can't be flat.

because of the 24h sun in Antarctica.. which killed the flat earth movement.

because all the atoms and molecules are round..
because it's common sense for mass to become roundy... nothing is flat in nature. look at your fingertips bro.. or at an apple/orange/melon .. all are roundy. no flat fruit exists.



deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Nope that was filmed in the artic
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Jeranism is top tier gatekeeping.

“We obviously haven’t actually seen the sun for 24 hours, but it is doing what they said it would do, very clearly..."
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I wouldn't trust that dude to even know where he flew too.
removed 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 4 children
14
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 14 points (+0 / -0 / +14Score on mirror ) 2 children
How do we know your dick is real? We have never seen it before.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror )
Neither has he. Have some compassion.
removed 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
But how do we know your a man?

You could be a woman, or a troon eunuch, for all we know.
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
How do you know that really small specs of dust are real?
removed 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Yes you do, every time you open a window and the light shines through, you see tiny specks of dust.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
It could be, but why shall we believe in that? The belief that there is an edge one could fall off would be enough to scare people from traveling too far away from home.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for convincing niggers and shitskins that the earth is flat so that maybe they hide at home in fear. But for regular people there is no benefit. Sometimes we just don't know the truth and that's something we have to accept.

I've seen enough proof of a somewhat spherical earth, as for the rest of space I don't know and I don't really care. Other planets are too far away and too out of reach for us to ever get there.
removed 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
And that is perfectly fine. Throughout history, the majority of people never traveled far away from home, that is a relatively new phenomena. So this edge, whether real or not wouldn't bother most people in the first place.

Thousands of years ago most of the Euroasian continent were all mapped out, people could travel allover it without fear of encountering the edge if they wanted to, but most people didn't.
ChippingToe on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
If it were "distance haze" then the sunset would just be the sun slowly fading into darkness. What actually happens is it gets abruptly cut off at the horizon, i.e. obstructed by the earth.

Please stop posting philosoraptor-esque observations that you haven't even spent 30 seconds thinking through to their logical conclusions. It makes you sound like a fucking retard.
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I’m not following. Of course mountains cause noticeable shadows…
Roleplaypete on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
This guy doesn't know bananas exist. Or humans.
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
No video. The earth must be a platonic shape. Rounded tetrahedron has already been determined. You both were wrong and both were right.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I prefer dodecahedron but no rounding; edges everywhere.
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
But that's the shape of the earth's soul and ours. Wouldnt be the same
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> because of the fact that the sun settles below the horizon..so it can't be flat.

I’m sure you could reconcile those two concepts if you wanted to employ a little imagination! If you earnestly try and can’t, I (and others) have some thoughts on the matter if you are interested.

> because of the 24h sun in Antarctica.. which killed the flat earth movement.

And yet, here you are talking about the “killed” flat earth movement. Curious.

> because all the atoms and molecules are round.. because it's common sense for mass to become roundy...

It certainly isn’t common sense. Newtonian gravitation (and epicurean, from which he inherited the idea) is not common sense. However, after being steeped in it from childhood - I can appreciate your perspective.
18
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 18 points (+0 / -0 / +18Score on mirror ) 3 children
> How do we know that Earth and other astral objects are spheres?

Math, logic, observations.

> I never once flew

That is irrelevant.

> nor have i seen any convincing footage

Is the [LIFE FOOTAGE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRPjKQtRXR8) of Earth sufficient for you?

> i'm just saying that i haven't found any convincing evidence that supports Spherical Earth

Because you put zero effort into it then. The very fact that a flat Earth is physically impossible should concern you. There is no way an astronomical entity of that mass could remain in a non-spherical shape. Also the atmosphere would just drift off, causing strong winds from the center to the side. The difference of air density would significantly differ from the center to the side, meaning the oxygen saturation at the center would be very high.

Also gravitation would not work. And the Earth flying at 9.81m/s upward forever (for no reason) wouldn't generate the effect of gravity, because there is nothing that would counteract the force of pushing. Which is btw the reason why we orbit the Sun and don't notice it.

And we can observe all sorts of astronomical objects, and they are ALL spherical. There is a good reason why. Only those of small sizes like asteroids have varying shapes, which however also tend to be spherical.

And there is no footage of an alleged edge of the Earth. Because it's impossible, there is no edge, because Earth is spherical.
deleted 1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 1 child
konoplya on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
fucking niggers are smarter than flat earthers
removed 1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 4 children
13
Tourgen on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 1 child
you shouldn't be allowed on the internet or to speak in public
removed 1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 1 child
> But how do we know that something is spherical if we are only observing it frontally.

As I said, logic. Do you have to count 1000000 + 2000000 = 3000000 by hand too? No. There are concepts out there (Math, Algebra, Addition) that allows us to do it reliably without having to use fingers.

> We could be looking at disks all facing the Earth.

If every place on Earth you stand on is orthogonally flat, it means it's spherical. That's the only way possible. There is no point where you fall off sideways. You can literally go around the world with ship or plane, and that in every direction. Which btw people already did.

> it's looks like a disk

Yeah, everything looks like a disk facing us. There is not a single instance of anything that looks like a tilted disk. Reason: Everything is spherical.

> That might be fake footage though.

It's impossible to fake a continuous footage with no breaks like that, which btw spans back to 2015, where potential means to edit footage was less advanced. To do CGI of that quality you'd need way more time to render than the resulting video. Meaning you'd need an hour to create what, 10 seconds of footage or so.

Also wtf is this fake accusation anyway? Are you sure you aren't a genuine flat Earther "playing stupid"?

Yes you are. I've debated enough of your kind to figure out the patterns. It's always the same shit.

> Or the the disk is so vast that no one has been to the edge yet

As it stands it's 0:1000 for flat Earthers, so it's their turn to bring even a SINGULAR piece of proof or argument as to not be a complete clown parade. This extreme skepticism leads to utter retardation. It's all fun and games until it manifests itself to an actual belief... it starts well with questioning everything, and ends up with this stupid AMERICAN psy-op of flat Earth that makes *us* look like imbeciles. It's a total waste of time.

Guess what, I don't like to be labeled an idiot via association, solely because I notice the jew and hate niggers and faggots. My IQ is 130+ btw, I am not some random dumbfuck who throws around random views and opinions. I care about being completely correct in everything that matters. And I work on things that have a level of difficulty only a tiny fraction of humans are capable to handle. I happen to be quite familiar with matters of space - in fact I wrote algorithms that procedurally generate galaxies. They can populate the entire observable universe. And I have cynical views and disagreements with science - I believe many "scientists" are spineless morons paid by tax money in their cushioned jobs, who produce NOTHING of value ever. I believe the general understanding of gravitation is lackluster, and the Black Matter theory is ridiculous. I also believe the Expansion of Space theory is false, and created counter-evidence that is not even addressed, even though it should be their starting point. The implications are also far-reaching, like the speed of light not being a constant as it is understood.

I am not some random moron who formed his views from some YouTube video binges. I put a lot of thought into these matters, way more than you ever will.
removed 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 3 children
Erase99 on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
"Math is satanic" is about the least German thing anyone could ever say.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
> Math is satanic though.

Math and logic are universal. If boil it down to the smallest common denominator, you have logic like 1+1=2 and a=a. If these statements are true, EVERYTHING else in math is true as well (as we know it). There is no other way to construct a set of logic without making it collapse on itself. Everything that is more complex in math is ultimately based on the simplest of axioms, and "counting sheep" is one of the simple things.

> God does not seek to confuse us.

If you have an IQ above ~95, you're not confused by it.

> Or the fixtures are permanent and unchanging, except for that which God has deigned, such as the shade on the little light to rule the night.

What the fuck is this retard speak? Do I have to play along Wonderland and LARP along this language?

> Create the fake footage, schedule for release.

It's going on for a DECADE already. And no, it's not fake. It's a simple footage, imagine that.

> I didn't think about the issue much before reacting to this post

Sure... for someone who just *happens* to side with flat Earthers, you sure know all the terminology they use. You just happen to be a free thinker who applies appropriate skepticism, right?

You can't fool me. Also I know what you are, and this bullshit doesn't make it any better.

> I still haven't found or heard any convincing evidence

You are purposefully retarded and reject all evidence. You cannot be reasoned with. There is NO way to convince you, ever, because you've driven yourself into a corner. I could shower you with evidence, but you'd reject 100% of it. And if there is a flat Earther who'd finally be convinced out of his delusions, you'd reject him and double down instead.

The delusions you are befallen with has no cure.

And btw, the theories about the heliocentric model are 2+ millennia old. So if you think muh' Nasa and muh' world conspiracy is a thing, the heliocentric model was established way before they even existed.

> leads me to believe that math is real

Math is a construct of mind. If you do not think about it, it doesn't exist. To niggers for example it doesn't exist. To civilizations that create intricate things that require precise planning and math, it is used. It's what allows us to have things like screws, architecture, satellites, cars, infrastructure. Niggers don't do math, they can't, so they live in mudhuts and do nothing all day.

> that physics are real

You may not believe in gravitation, but does that make you float? No, it just reduces your understanding of physics. Things just happen, and you don't feel a need to understand any of it. An understanding of physics requires quite some intelligence and knowledge, which is why even among Whites not many have it. And even among those there are a lot of discrepancies. In essence, physics is the measurement of reality, application of math and converting it back into reality.

> that "the planets" are real

I am sure you took quite some time to verify it yourself, right? Zero seconds you say? Oh... of course.

> that Earth is a sphere trundling through some black void etc.

It's literally the same belief among flat Earthers, with the difference that Earth goes in a straight line at a speed of 9.81m/s. And the space it travels through must be empty, aka a "black void."

Just to show you one of the logical flaws of your beliefs. This is all based on sophistry, to craft words that "sound good." While they try to ridicule the shape of planets, they fail to realize they are the biggest clowns on the planet, even beneath woketards, communists and screeching leftoids (like the meme) in terms of ridiculousness.

Flat Earthers wear their beliefs like a badge of honor, which is why I believe there were plenty of jews who proudly wore the Judenstern and doubled down on jewing around. It's the same mentality.
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
>But how do we know that something is spherical if we are only observing it frontally.

We aren't, the planets rotate.

>That might be fake footage though.

Flat earthers say that about all footage.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Except all those stupid videos they always try to share.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
How dare you make a valid point about the limitations of observation
removed 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
JohnTorrington on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
How does that video prove anything? That's just a satellite high up pointing down lol

You seen the Saturn pics? You are telling me that shit looks real? LOL whos the retard.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Don’t worry, no one will ever believe anything you say again. No need to put any effort into your spam anymore.
JohnTorrington on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Ok boomer
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Thanks for admitting that space is real and that everything you’ve posted here is paid jewish shilling.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The video proves that there is no edge and that the planet isn't infinite. Ergo not flat.

If logic, math and physics doesn't work on you people, perhaps actual life footage would. If that doesn't work either, you are hopelessly indoctrinated and immune to reason. NOTHING can convince you. Forever trapped in retardation.

There was a flat Earther who went to the Arctic and observed the Sun not going down, but being visible the entire time for an entire day. According to FE theories that should be impossible.

So guess how many people it convinced? 0. Maybe 1 - the guy himself. Why? Because he was accused of doing mistakes or fraud. It's a cult that shields itself from losing members - AS ALL CULTS DO. You can get one person out, and that will merely embolden all others to stay.
JohnTorrington on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
You seem very emotional about defending those frauds at NASA and a government that has lied about literally everything. It's actually quite hilarious how defensive you get about it.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yes, I am personally invested into it, because I don't want opponents of jewry to be associated with flat Earth brainlets like you. There is nothing more damaging to our movement than that, a rot from the inside.

Remember, everything you believe in is low-IQ idiocy. That will never change.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
>wow you care about the truth therefore it isn’t true

>how dare you want to stop white genocide by doing that you prove there isn’t one

Commit suicide, jew.
12
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 3 children
We don't know that it's a sphere, and it is in fact not a perfect sphere either. But it is reasonably enough spherical that we can travel around it. Many civilizations figured this out thousands of years ago through measurements.

The old Egyptians built obelisks to measure the surface of the earth. The metric system is based on 1/10,000,000 of 1/4 of the earths surface, physically measured. Christoper Columbus tried to get to pajeetistan via a shortcut to import cheaper curry, knowing that the earth was somewhat spherical but ended up in America.

The Vikings wouldn't have set of to America if they believed in an edge of the world which is implied by flat earth crazies.

Tall mountains and deep oceans is what ruins the perfect sphere, but they are relatively insignificant and it's been proven mathematically.
12
Weematanyeh on scored.co
1 year ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's not the oceans and mountains that have the greatest effect on the earth not being an perfect sphere, it bulges at the equator due to centrifugal force.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Yep, that is a reasonable theory too. I believe in the moon too, as a spherical object with it's own gravity, circulating around earth in 1 month at the time. It explains some weather patterns as well as tidal waves in the ocean. These are all things we can observe with our own eyes.
deleted 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> The old Egyptians built obelisks to measure the surface of the earth.

I don’t think that’s correct, but would be very interested to learn I was wrong!

The ancient Egyptians also had a flat earth worldview… by the by.
10
el_hoovy on scored.co
1 year ago 10 points (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror ) 1 child
we haven't found any "convincing evidence" you've got a little leash leading to a bush with a fed in it either, but here we are.
removed 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 3 children
13
el_hoovy on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 1 child
no, you choose "50 cents an hour" over "do literally any research", mr. retard. there is a wealth of proof ranging from literal greek mathematicians' work to regular Joes with cameras on youtube, all unaffiliated with any truth-controlling organization. even things you can see with your own eyes, or extrapolate from common sense about the world, all point to the correct notion that astral objects are mostly spherical.

to believe anything else is foolish. to promote anything else as "skepticism" online, trying to equate it with true, very-dangerous-to-government skepticism, is enemy action straight out of the CIA handbook.
removed 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Of course not. You never will be. You're "questioning" everything while answering nothing.
deleted 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
removed 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
removed 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
FuckMcNuggets on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
For me it's just the intuitive way of things, and it conforms to our understanding of physics. If it were flat it would mean there needs to be a force that accelerates all things down for no reason, and all of the planets' orbits would be fucked up instead of fitting nicely on ellipses.
removed 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 3 children
FuckMcNuggets on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Our understanding of physics can be proved in many ways, I'm sure you know that. Usually things behave according to some rules, and I believe God was nice enough to make them intuitive. Why invent extra rules when you can just use those already in place? The jews aren't smart enough to create such a complex and beautiful projection and have it consistently there for so many years.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>and that's cool, my intuitive way is to question it.

Question...what? That things make sense?

Look at the sun. That's all you have to do.

See how it always goes from East to West over time? That makes sense on a globe, not on a disc.

Note how night and day are almost the same duration and night isn't, say, significantly longer than the day, like it would be if it had to cross a bunch of land that we didn't know about? That makes sense on a globe, not on a disc.

Ever notice that you can see the stars way far away in the sky, but not the other side of the ocean? Wonder why ships have been putting people in crows nests to see further for hundred, if not thansands, of years? Makes sense on a globe, not on a disc.

See, we also "question" things, but we're actually looking for answers, and all the answers point to FE being a psyop.
removed 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
removed 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> gravity has been explained by Einstein

Gravity (and by that I mean gravitation) is never explained. Newton famously refused to even try, and declared that it was simply god’s will. In a way, the entire hypothetical contrivance of “space time” was invented as a means to TRY and explain Newtonian gravitation - however, when you use a fictional/non-real thing (spacetime) to try to explain something real (gravity)…

> He's not wrong because we use his equations to predict outcomes in reality.

They said the same thing about geocentrism and the rain dance! There is a HUGE difference between **useful** (i.e. testable predictions which correspond to reality) and **correct**. Even Einstein knew he was wrong towards the end…

> remains undiscovered.

Or never existed to find in the first instance! The simplest answer is often the correct one.
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Questioning everything is kind of spergy though.

Greek philosophers say the Earth is round.

Listen to your "ancestors".
removed 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
"Hellenic Heathens"

No such thing. All religions are ethno religions. Ethnicity creates culture and religion.

All jews are judaism by default.
All arabs are muslims by default.
All Europeans are Pagan by default.

"I listen to God almighty."

God foolishly chose kikes as his chosen, which lead to them killing his son.

Because of that, and the fact that most humans refuse to listen to God, kikes and Christians included, God probably hates most humans.

Christian's, kikes, and dunes coons are worshipping someone who, in all likelihood, will destroy most of their souls on judgement day.



removed 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
How is it blasphemy to quote the holy text?

Holy text says God chose kikes as his chosen for some reason.

Holy text says kikes orchestrated the death of Gods son, Jesus.

Holy text says that on judgement day, God will destroy the souls of evil doers.

You yourself said that humans are fallen and sinful, so by your own logic, most humans go to hell, aka soul destruction.
Tourgen on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
certified failed middle school science
removed 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
removed 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Are you actually retarded?
removed 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
MCMoneyPants on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
> i'm just saying that i haven't found any convincing evidence that supports Spherical Earth.

Then you haven't been looking.

Or more likely - you're a well-poisoning kike.
alele-opathic on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
> i haven't found any convincing evidence that supports Spherical Earth.

Aside from /u/Shivananda rather succinct reply, the ancient's figured this out largely because:
* all other celestial objects were round, and
* the discovery that noon in one area wasn't noon in another led to the earliest suggestion of what we now call time zones, and ultimately to calculating the circumference of the Earth in Eratosthenes' famous experiment, and
* the idea that celestial objects were just 'lights' in firmament was put to bed with the invention of the telescope, where we could see the objects (gods, now called planets) rotate periodically (and thus we could determine the length of Venus/Saturn/etc's day).
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
We’re not retards, that’s how we know.
kalerg_plan on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 2 children
Even in this thread all of the midwits take the bait and debate the flat Earth retard. We're doomed.
Maskurbator on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
I thought flat earth was a joke that everyone just played along with (like everyone hating Nickelback) up until maybe four years ago.
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Debate is for fools and the idiots who watch their pageantry. The subject is irrelevant.

Rational discourse and earnest diligent study is for the learned, again - subject is irrelevant.
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 5 children
UFOs are schizo nonsense too imo.

Also, while many have been killed by vaccines, why do anti vax people never mention deaths from refusing vaccines?
14
Horrux on scored.co
1 year ago 14 points (+0 / -0 / +14Score on mirror ) 1 child
Coz there aren't any...
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You argue like a kike
Horrux on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Show me where Koch's Postulates were ever met, and then I'll start believing those fairy tales.

I'll bet you have absolutely no idea what those are... Sigh.
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Vaccines or ufos?
Horrux on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You argue like a retard.
13
RoulerBleu on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror )
Because you aren't forced to *refuse* vaccines, you are forced the take them.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 1 child
Vaccines are jew pseudoscience to begin with.
Eganzo on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
Let’s take this aborted fetus infected with measles and create more measles
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The guys in the second panel added a few to the first LOL.
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Hi retard!!!!
Cleatusvandamme1 on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
Guys, the earth is moving a gazillions miles through space and 9 gorillion Jews died for no reason at all on ww2
BelievingDidymus on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
It's Flat. Don't know how you can believe the gvt is lying about everything but space...also all the serpent imagery in nasa.
19
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 19 points (+0 / -0 / +19Score on mirror ) 2 children
Not only is that a terrible argument contradicting "do your own research", but it's also not "the government" telling us to blindly trust certain aspects of how the world works. Most of this knowledge has been around and proven mathematically since long before USA was created.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Note that the Flat Earthers are exactly the same as normies except, instead of believing everything they're told by the government, they *disbelieve* everything they're told, even when it's clearly true.

jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> Most of this knowledge has been around and proven mathematically since long before USA was created.

This is a popularly taught erroneous view. You don’t prove things mathematically (except IN mathematics!) in reality, you **describe** them using mathematics.

You don’t think that the stars in the sky are really spherical balls of gas because of any mathematical proof. The contrived “proofs”, when they exist, come long after and are backfilled.
16
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 16 points (+0 / -0 / +16Score on mirror ) 1 child
I refuse to believe flat earthers are not gigga trolls.
Tourgen on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
some people are actually just that retarded. i kind of have re-evaluated my opinions on slavery once i realized this. also it makes the atheists' arguments even more cringe and dumb when you think about it a bit. I like the idea of a more rigid hierarchical social class structure now, too. not that I'm saying I belong in the top class either, I don't. but keeping the dummies in their place and away from power is required for any long-lasting society.
Maskurbator on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Didn't Owen Benjamin unironically become a flat earther?
GREED_IS_GOOD on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Mostly anyone who honestly looks into flat earth becomes a flat earther.

At very minimum they will end up admitting the spinning ball kike/mason lies are absurd.
PleaseFaceWall on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Why does this always show up after threads mocking FE, while no one is making threads supporting FE.

Where does this impulse come from?
deleted 1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 2 children
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Just kill yourself, yid. It’s not fooling anyone.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
>Why would anyone rabidly attack anyone who talks of any scenario other than what is taught in (((science class)))?

Cause it's stupid? And we've all sat down and thought about it for an hour or two, so we know it's stupid? And the people pushing it have not only failed to do this but they also always try to act as though they possess some kind of gnostic wisdom that we're not enlightened enough to comprehend?

The fact that I would have to ask you *which* equally ridiculous version of FE you beleive in (disc, secret land behind ice wall, Donut Earth) while everyone understands the exact same globe, should give you a hint.

deleted 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
Your theory is objectively false and you’re too stupid to be white. Find another website to spam.
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
I heard a story about a guy who said the germans could only bombard england with their giga-artillery because they used "flat earth math". No, I'm not kidding.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
As a kid, I heard a story about how the evil not zees thought the Earth was a bowl, so they went somewhere at night to look up at the sky with a telescope to get targeting data for a distant nation and they didn’t see anything. Ha ha those stupid Germans! They deserved genocide, didn’t they kids?
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
???
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
No, seriously. I actually read that somewhere. Damned if I can find the reference now. But the book (or whatever it was) said that the Germans believed in [*this* specific version of “flat earth”](https://i.etsystatic.com/26214993/r/il/fb8c17/3079016391/il_fullxfull.3079016391_i3j7.jpg) (or one similar) where it’s not perfectly flat, but bowled and upraised (which allows the Sun to set) so that some land is “above” other land. Thus you should be able to spy on foreign countries by pointing a telescope at the sky at night and seeing that distant land “up” on the crest of the Earth-hill. “Ha ha, those stupid national socialists! The Earth isn’t curvy like that! Good thing all of their political positions are illegal for all eternity, otherwise we’d be stupid, too!”
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
In a way, that’s correct. It was known as the Knickebein system.

“Flat earth” math (and by that I mean mathematics that assumes a mostly flat/planar world) is used by many agencies effectively, including the faa and nasa.
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
GREED_IS_GOOD on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Moon landing is absolutely fake. Get over it.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Scream for me, paid jewish shill.
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
For any and all with interest in this subject and/or the heavily advertised (i.e. funded) psyop that surrounds/propagates it; please join us to exchange views on c/flatearthresearch!

All views welcome!
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Commit suicide immediately, paid jewish shill.
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Oh tallest shill, never change.

Your steadfast militant belligerence and commitment to never understanding other perspectives is almost endearing.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
# The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.

* Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
* Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
* Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
* Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
* Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
* Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
* Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
* Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
* Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”?
* Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
* If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
* If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
* A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
* Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
* Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
* The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
* What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
* How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
* Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
* Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
* Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
* If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
* If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
* Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
* How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
* Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?
jack445566778899 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.

And just look at you wailing with your copypasta gish gallop :(

In order to learn anything, you need to ask questions earnestly. Your proud and unwavering belief that the questions on your list have no answers keeps you ignorant :(

If you want to learn what the answers are, choose the question you feel is the most “unanswerable” and start a thread about it on c/flatearthresearch (or somewhere else, if you wish - but fyi - I do not abuse mod powers, will not censor you, and I think it is the appropriate place to discuss the topic - unlike conpro!).
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>copypasta

Truth doesn’t change.

>Gish gallop

Translation: “I am physically incapable of answering even a single question, therefore because all physical evidence in the entire universe is against me, I am correct.”

>choose the question

No, you.

Kill yourself, paid jewish shill.
Toast message