Pope Francis urges eradication of antisemitism
(www.cbsnews.com)
Can't be antisemitic if there's no semites.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
41 comments:
Israeli jews are the most antisemitic people on the planet. Palestinians are semitic and jews just genocide about 50,000 of them
I've never understood why the Arabs do not tell the rest of the world this, 24/7. It makes perfect sense and is obviously true.
Because the jewish press would shut it down if they did. And they would also have to admit both they and the Arabs are not actually full semites (if they have any in them at all) but rather Canaanites, and the entire Dispensationalist narrative protecting them from being purged from Christian lands would collapse overnight.
"Also, maybe some Christians were killed but, as the Pope of the Catholic Church, I think we should focus all of our energies on helping Jews"
**This** is the guy God personally put in charge of his Church?
**This** is the guy God personally put in charge of his Church?
Well, YHWH is god to the ✡people✡ who put him in charge, so technically.
"Pope" Francis
Saint Francis heard Jesus speak to him from the crucifix: “Go, rebuild my church which is falling down.” Saint Francis would go on to drive out corruption from the Church, instituting changes in practice and tradition that would restore the piety and holiness of the Church for centuries.
Then this snake comes along, takes the name of Saint Francis in mockery, and begins to destroy the Church from the inside out.
Take note how the devil mocks God!
Then this snake comes along, takes the name of Saint Francis in mockery, and begins to destroy the Church from the inside out.
Take note how the devil mocks God!
The pope deserves to be impaled
> The "pope" deserves to be impaled.
FTFY
FTFY
u/CrusaderPepe and I debated this.
He claims that God intervention must remove the pope.
My argument is we clearly know he is a fraud, and God has given us the wisdom to know he is a fraud, therefore we should apprehend him ourselves and beat him to death for glorifying sodomy and washing niggers' feet.
He claims that God intervention must remove the pope.
My argument is we clearly know he is a fraud, and God has given us the wisdom to know he is a fraud, therefore we should apprehend him ourselves and beat him to death for glorifying sodomy and washing niggers' feet.
I wouldn't really say it was a "debate"...
What I am putting forth is the authoritative Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) that a good result comes from it (removal of a bad Pope). Catholic teaching is that both the act and result must be morally permissible for the whole thing to be moral. Also, it is a sin to kill one of God's anointed ones, which has it's Biblical basis in 1 Samuel/Kings chapter 24, where David refused to kill King Saul, when he had the chance, even though Saul was a wicked king.
Your opinion, on the other hand, is your opinion, and it sounds like your moral basis is consequentialism/utilitarianism (i.e. "the end justifies the means") instead of Catholic morality, as I illustrated above.
So... not really a "debate", even though we do disagree.
I'm fine with you having your opinion, though, and agreeing to disagree, just as long as you express it as such, and don't try to represent it as a valid Catholic opinion.
Hopefully, this clarifies our positions, and settles that it's just a gentlemen's disagreement. Take care, and God bless!
What I am putting forth is the authoritative Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) that a good result comes from it (removal of a bad Pope). Catholic teaching is that both the act and result must be morally permissible for the whole thing to be moral. Also, it is a sin to kill one of God's anointed ones, which has it's Biblical basis in 1 Samuel/Kings chapter 24, where David refused to kill King Saul, when he had the chance, even though Saul was a wicked king.
Your opinion, on the other hand, is your opinion, and it sounds like your moral basis is consequentialism/utilitarianism (i.e. "the end justifies the means") instead of Catholic morality, as I illustrated above.
So... not really a "debate", even though we do disagree.
I'm fine with you having your opinion, though, and agreeing to disagree, just as long as you express it as such, and don't try to represent it as a valid Catholic opinion.
Hopefully, this clarifies our positions, and settles that it's just a gentlemen's disagreement. Take care, and God bless!
I agree with you. Nothing in Church Cannon requires us to idly watch the wolves slaughter the sheep.
Actually... Church moral teaching does go against what Vlad says, I am afraid...
It's Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) that a good result comes from it (removal of a bad Pope). Catholic teaching is that both the act and result must be morally permissible for the whole thing to be moral. In addition to this (as if it wasn't enough), it is a sin to kill one of God's anointed ones (which means no Papicide), which has it's Biblical basis in 1 Samuel/Kings chapter 24, where David refused to kill King Saul, when he had the chance, even though Saul was a wicked king.
Hopefully, this clarifies Catholic teaching. God bless!
It's Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) that a good result comes from it (removal of a bad Pope). Catholic teaching is that both the act and result must be morally permissible for the whole thing to be moral. In addition to this (as if it wasn't enough), it is a sin to kill one of God's anointed ones (which means no Papicide), which has it's Biblical basis in 1 Samuel/Kings chapter 24, where David refused to kill King Saul, when he had the chance, even though Saul was a wicked king.
Hopefully, this clarifies Catholic teaching. God bless!
> It's Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) ...
Nobody talking about actually impaling the fucker. That doesn't mean the Cardinals can't gather and convene on ALL the heretical shit this "pope" has said and done to toss him out. I've read works by Canonical Doctors that argue that Bergoglio has recused himself with all he's done so far.
Nobody talking about actually impaling the fucker. That doesn't mean the Cardinals can't gather and convene on ALL the heretical shit this "pope" has said and done to toss him out. I've read works by Canonical Doctors that argue that Bergoglio has recused himself with all he's done so far.
more proof he is the antipope
The very first person he invited to his inauguration was Gustavo Gutiérrez; known as the "father of liberation theology," he was a Dominican priest and theologian from Peru who helped the Sandinista Marxists paramilitary find and murder Christians.
Let me say that again: a Dominican priest helped Sandinista Marxists find and murder Christians buy luring them to Mass and Confession, where Marxists were waiting to murder them. That is who Bergoglio called first and invited to Rome for his installation. The words don't exist to express the unholy depravity of that Goddamn snake!
Let me say that again: a Dominican priest helped Sandinista Marxists find and murder Christians buy luring them to Mass and Confession, where Marxists were waiting to murder them. That is who Bergoglio called first and invited to Rome for his installation. The words don't exist to express the unholy depravity of that Goddamn snake!
How are catholic cucks okay with this guy? Why aren’t they tearing the entire institution down to rip this guy out?
For the same reasons NatSocs haven’t overthrown Jewish governments in Europe.
Because the (((Allied Powers))) basically ovveran the Church after they were finished gutting Germany. The Pope has basically been a prisoner in Rome ever since the (((Second Vatican Counsel))), and the jews made sure to flood the seminaries with literal communist faggots (which led to the sex abuse scandal) to make sure the clergy would be compromised for the next century. Of course, the Church has a natural immune system to deal with subversion and infiltration in the form of priestly celibacy, but unfortunately it takes a lot of time for it to correct itself.
This is what happens when you allow lukewarm boomers to run institutions. God gives us the leadership we deserve for the vices (in this case, there heresy of Modernism) we tolerate instead of eradicating as He commands. Had the faithful openly opposed the degeneracy of the jews instead of embracing them as our "elder brothers in faith" (which they are not, their religion is younger than ours and was created in opposition to Christ), we would currently have a based Pope on the seat of St. Peter instead of this gentleman.
Many Marxists and Freemasons have been proven to have infiltrated the Church just prior to Vatican II (1962). Annibale Bugnini was an Italian Catholic prelate who led the reform of the Roman Rite after the Second Vatican Council. Bugnini was working for the Soviets to expose priests inside Russia who were caught and executed. The guy disappeared once others were catching on to him. To this day, nobody officially knows what happened to him. We have so many enemies within the Church, most in plain sight. They're not even hiding anymore. Open commies/ faggots.
I knew Bugini was a probable mason and he helped destroy the liturgy, but I had no idea he was helping the commies hunt Christians. What an utter demon.
Yes, and as I mentioned here, the very first person Bergoglio invited to his inauguration was Gustavo Gutiérrez; the so-called "father of liberation theology" who helped Sandinista Marxists find and murder Christians buy luring them to Mass and Confession, where Marxists were waiting to murder them. Indeed, "the smoke of satan has entered the Church of God."
Toast message
Actually, since the Church is the Religion of the Hebrews and the jews hate the Church, theyre Anti-semitic. Hmmm. What could the Pope have meant by this?