New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
37
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +37Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
XBX_X on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I agree with you. Nothing in Church Cannon requires us to idly watch the wolves slaughter the sheep.
CrusaderPepe on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Actually... Church moral teaching does go against what Vlad says, I am afraid...

It's Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) that a good result comes from it (removal of a bad Pope). Catholic teaching is that both the act and result must be morally permissible for the whole thing to be moral. In addition to this (as if it wasn't enough), it is a sin to kill one of God's anointed ones (which means no Papicide), which has it's Biblical basis in 1 Samuel/Kings chapter 24, where David refused to kill King Saul, when he had the chance, even though Saul was a wicked king.

Hopefully, this clarifies Catholic teaching. God bless!
XBX_X on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> It's Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) ...

Nobody talking about actually impaling the fucker. That doesn't mean the Cardinals can't gather and convene on ALL the heretical shit this "pope" has said and done to toss him out. I've read works by Canonical Doctors that argue that Bergoglio has recused himself with all he's done so far.
CrusaderPepe on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Sorry if I misunderstood. Vlad was talking about actual Papicide (in our previous conversations, at least) which is why I brought it up. And yes, you are correct that a council could convict a Pope of being a heretic and depose him. God bless!
Toast message