New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
37
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +37Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 1 child
The pope deserves to be impaled
XBX_X on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
> The "pope" deserves to be impaled.

FTFY
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
u/CrusaderPepe and I debated this.

He claims that God intervention must remove the pope.

My argument is we clearly know he is a fraud, and God has given us the wisdom to know he is a fraud, therefore we should apprehend him ourselves and beat him to death for glorifying sodomy and washing niggers' feet.
CrusaderPepe on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I wouldn't really say it was a "debate"...

What I am putting forth is the authoritative Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) that a good result comes from it (removal of a bad Pope). Catholic teaching is that both the act and result must be morally permissible for the whole thing to be moral. Also, it is a sin to kill one of God's anointed ones, which has it's Biblical basis in 1 Samuel/Kings chapter 24, where David refused to kill King Saul, when he had the chance, even though Saul was a wicked king.

Your opinion, on the other hand, is your opinion, and it sounds like your moral basis is consequentialism/utilitarianism (i.e. "the end justifies the means") instead of Catholic morality, as I illustrated above.

So... not really a "debate", even though we do disagree.

I'm fine with you having your opinion, though, and agreeing to disagree, just as long as you express it as such, and don't try to represent it as a valid Catholic opinion.

Hopefully, this clarifies our positions, and settles that it's just a gentlemen's disagreement. Take care, and God bless!
XBX_X on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I agree with you. Nothing in Church Cannon requires us to idly watch the wolves slaughter the sheep.
CrusaderPepe on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Actually... Church moral teaching does go against what Vlad says, I am afraid...

It's Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) that a good result comes from it (removal of a bad Pope). Catholic teaching is that both the act and result must be morally permissible for the whole thing to be moral. In addition to this (as if it wasn't enough), it is a sin to kill one of God's anointed ones (which means no Papicide), which has it's Biblical basis in 1 Samuel/Kings chapter 24, where David refused to kill King Saul, when he had the chance, even though Saul was a wicked king.

Hopefully, this clarifies Catholic teaching. God bless!
XBX_X on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> It's Catholic teaching that you cannot commit an evil act (murder) ...

Nobody talking about actually impaling the fucker. That doesn't mean the Cardinals can't gather and convene on ALL the heretical shit this "pope" has said and done to toss him out. I've read works by Canonical Doctors that argue that Bergoglio has recused himself with all he's done so far.
Toast message