so it sounds like to you natsoc is basically Christian nationalism. But like that's something different. You could have capitalism and Christian nationalism.
Which brings up again my skepticism and makes me question what natsocs are about. I think some self-identify as natsoc because it just triggers leftists which is admittedly hilarious. I saw a SJW the other day post unironically they want to ban porn because it is "degrading to women" which sounded exactly like "Nazis" who want to do the same thing. They seemed oblivious that they were in agreement with "Nazis" (well some, anyway).
I guess part of the point of my post was to identify specific things that natsocs like or are about. Frequently I see online a vague understanding of economics by natsocs, which makes me think in reality they could probably be natcaps (nationalist capitalists) with just a little economics reading or reasoning. "Socialism" is not really necessary to their views, it's just they identify with natsoc because they think it represents other views they might have (like Christian nationalism).
And again so if a natsoc simply wants to be free to be a Christian away from like muslim or Jewish or other religious influences, this isn't really intrinsic to authoritarian natsoc but could be compatible with libertarian nationalist capitalism. You can just have property owners ban a lot of degeneracy and not "consoom" it yourself.
Also it seems strange to me that so many haven't tried to distance natsoc from any kind of implication of a desire for violence. Probably because such natsocs are angry, and they like people thinking of them as edgy. But I imagine a lot of natsocs don't want to hurt anyone, they just want to be left alone to be who they are.
So actually the "violent authoritarian natsoc" seems like they might be in reality a nonviolent libertarian-ish nationalist capitalist.
didn't click link but I've seen the idea before, on the surface it sounds nonsensical like those who identify as "pan-attracted" ... they attracted to animals and kids too?
So similarly how ridiculous is a "pan" government. It can't be anarchy and monarchy at the same time, so which is it, anarchy or monarchy? They are binary choices. Unless it's saying something like privatized institutions in something like anarcho-capitalism, is much like government institutions, and so it's acknowledging the centrality of some kind of institution for human organization.
I could see people trying out different forms of government or cycling through them.
yeah, I go back and forth on how much manual / mental versus human calculation we need
I do think a case can be made for outsourcing all the calculation to the computers and just having us do higher reasoning or lower level thinking simply to identify what calculations need to be made instead of making them
it's like digging a hole. If we have excavator machines, do we need to teach kids to dig with a shovel? More manual calculation is only really needed if we get in to a survival scenario where we can't have access to a calculator device or computer to calculate with. Otherwise we would be more productive just teaching how to operate the machines.
Since we have limited time to teach, we could possibly cover more ground by not teaching manual / mental calculation so much as how to operate calculators and computers more. Maybe just an idea of how to calculate if you need it in a pinch.
well so assuming you're not orthodox (based on the video) we would consider you to be "protestant" as well I guess (are you like independent baptist?).
interestingly I forget if we've had conversations about this before, but it seems like with the papacy being taken over, that the "pope" (who is not actually a pope from some Catholics' viewpoint) is "anti-Christ" now just like many protestants have believed for years. Yes, Francis has been calling for a need for a "New World Order". These accusations came from protestants for a while but now Catholics hold some of these views against the current "popes". It is a strange situation.
He's saying that "you can't be a Christian if..." you believe something that Christians believe. Like Christians have always been ok with people having weapons, I imagine - even to protect yourself against animals. So there's no substance to a statement that you can't be a Christian and make or own weapons.
I don't really know if this is the end of times though. I could see somehow an actual Catholic pope getting back in the Vatican for some time and the pendulum completely swinging in a different direction. It's really to me impossible to tell what the future holds. There are some things not in place for the end of times it seems, yet. I could see it go either way, they could fall in to place or fall off track for a long time.
Covid's aftermath now looks confusing in retrospect. Some people were saying it was a mark of the beast, but there were things that weren't in place for that to be true. And now it seems the plan failed for now possibly (?), things opened back up for now. But the same stuff could happen again in connection to some kind of false religion. Or maybe not, maybe things will persist for some time off in to the future.
as you're already aware but I will simply repeat, the Vatican appears to be taken over by non-Catholic / non-Christian SJWs who parrot a lot of wacky things, like "pope" Francis has said any host of strange things we would gawk at here:
but also I think in my own experience, it's kind of the raw aftereffects of some of these misandrist attitudes in society and squeezing of men financially at times and all that
Oh yeah I forgot one motivation I had for these posts was to DEBOONK some things they said. Like that one reason why men are harming themselves is because society tells them to be strong and not get help from a therapist or open up about their emotions. This just sounds like misdirection and gaslighting.
Well at least in my experience of talking with school counselors, these people are just as confused about life themselves. So therapy to me is not helpful but maybe journaling is useful instead. Talking to a good man can be good instead though of course. But I've also experienced my emotions do jack squat to fix any of my problems, so I've felt less of them over time.
I just overall think the "you need help" narrative is a bit feminine. The reason some men don't get help is because they know they have to do the work themselves. No one will do the work for them in certain instances. So sure you can talk to a therapist but you're going to have to do whatever it is to fix your life anyway. I think instead a lot of these stressors are just nasty and guys don't know how to cope sometimes. So the solution isn't "therapy" so much as make it easier to be a man in society, not as worried about unfair divorce courts and being promoted in school and work to be able to make more to take care of themselves.
so I think there's probably a lot of people where this escalation does not happen
as for how to stop it, I think there needs to be more of a message over "just stop"
It requires prayer, fasting perhaps, exercise, good relationships, work, and so on - a whole bunch of things to keep people busy in life and satisfied and with the resources they need to quit