New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I've come up with this theory. Well, it's very likely not unique at all, but here we go : So i believe that different people groups, races for example, have certain predispositions in their thoughts and obviously actions, from either genetics or culture / upbringing, largely genetics, likely both. This leads to them having different moral values, like jews seeing it as ok to genocide every other race as long as they get to be kings, and white people largely being less ethnocentric. However, here's the kicker, the groups see their moral values as objectively correct, as universal, as THE truth. The jews will never change their morality because they see it as THE truth, as THE moral good to kill or enslave everyone else and plunder them for eternity.

That's why debates with outgroups are so useless, you're trying to argue away genetic and cultural predispositions.

What do you think? is there anything to this?
You must log in or sign up to comment
21 comments:
devotech2 on scored.co
9 months ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 1 child
The jews know that they're wrong and that they have completely lost favor.

>"Forty years before the destruction of the Temple, the scarlet cord stopped turning white showing that Yom Kippur sacrifice was not accepted by God."

From the talmud.

They acknowledged themselves that God stopped accepting sacrifices and had turned on them. But instead of learning their lesson and going towards Christ, which is something that they can do whenever they want, they doubled down...on God. It won't end well for them
Delon on scored.co
9 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
because of genetic and cultural predispositions as i theorized
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
But individuals within these groups can still be convinced. We see this all the time with Africans seeing early White colonists as gods, or Indians admitting that their women are ugly compared to Whites.

There is objective Good, but it's totally possible that people need a certain level of brain development to see it. Further, most people will stick to what they know "instinctively" rather than admit what they rationally know is right.
Delon on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
which is why i said it's only predisposition and not set in stone
gkb87 on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
They can be convinced but they will never create that morality on their own or carry it forward into the future. That's why genetics and culture are interlinked.
That's why there is a Chinatown or Koreatown in every major city in the West. Look at what happened to African Americans after they were desegregated. They were Christian and moral for a few generations and now they have reverted back to their impulsive behavior.
devotech2 on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Yes. But, the jews themselves don't think they're the good guys. They acknowledged and knew full well that God had ceased to bless them, but they still persist because they really really want to be special somehow
Delon on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
well then there's the argument for genes > culture
TallestSkil on scored.co
9 months ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
>So i believe that different people groups, races for example, have certain predispositions in their thoughts and obviously actions

That’s biology, yeah.

>The jews will never change their morality because they see it as THE truth

>What do you think? is there anything to this?

Yep. The only answer is to exterminate all four other species of humanity, plus the jews.
gkb87 on scored.co
9 months ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
I agree with you, I think genetics predetermine culture and therefore morality too. If people look so drastically different on the outside, why should the inside be different?
ProductConnoisseur on scored.co
9 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Yes I came to this conclusion as well
Tourgen on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
some people don't care. they believe what is good for them and their people is good (objective or not, doesn't matter) and what is bad for them is bad. universalism is rejected out of hand.

they'll structure their spiritual beliefs around those bedrock beliefs. so outgroup preference is strictly seen as bad, always. it's called a strength morality. strength is rewarded, cherished, encouraged. Christianity unfortunately for us is not this.
Zrupsloohg on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Morality is determined by which groups the beholder seeks to benefit. Most people in "the west" believe that all humans are an equal blank slate to be shaped by their environment. This is an incredibly alien view to everyone else in the world, who will primarily seek to benefit themselves or their immediate kin.

If a hypothetical group believed that they deserved to benefit the most because they see themselves as the smartest and most deserving of inheriting the world and its resources, they're not going to sympathize with anyone who gets in their way.
Rumor_HasIt on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Agree 👍 I've always thought about that too. If your way of Life, Religion, Morality, Culture etc, has Always been pressed upon you since Birth, ; so hasn't Most Every Other Single Human Beings. Of Course Every Other Faction is also going to Assume *Theirs* is the *Correct Way*

Does make it seem Daunting to try and Rationalize with those that are going to Holdfast to What they Believe and have been Told, is Correct.

🤔
damnesia on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Something feels off about the way you're describing this... Maybe a bit too vague but I think I mostly agree with it. Let me propose a little more that might make your idea more complete.

The way I have understood it is that cooperation within a group of humans leads to better outcomes which leads to greater survivability. Religion serves as a set of rules for groups to obey and offers narrative explanations for the validity of those roles for those that would question them. If the moral system corresponds well with reality then the group that adopts it will succeed genetically. Once such a moral system becomes well established it would then in turn exert evolutionary pressure upon humans. That is to say humans that were more genetically fit to work well with the system would be more likely to survive and reproduce whereas those that did not would fail within it, be outcast by it or killed by it depending on the severity of the incompatibility with the system.

The relationship is symbiotic. Systems that work well are more fit evolutionarily and increase the number of beings within them. The system itself creates its own version of fitness which would shape the people under it. But there would also be people within these systems, these populations, which would bring something different which was incompatible with the system but created even better outcomes. These people would exert pressure on the system to change. I actually think what you're proposing is placing maybe too much importance on the genetic aspect of this. I think the morality and the genetics are like interlocking pieces that when put together create something more effective. But I don't think if say... You plopped a bunch of Jewish babies down somewhere with no inherited moral system that they would produce an identical or even similar moral system in the long run.

There are some people here that believe that other races, especially jews, are just evil to their core. That they are literally the spawn of demons. I think there are better scientific explanations. Their moral system establishes them as an oppressed outgroup who are, in fact, Gods only chosen people and thus the only real people. In this way it justifies them in treating all others as animals. It essentially makes it to where they have to have no moral consideration for anyone outside of their race and because they are a minority it encourages cunning and deceipt in pursuit of success. Honestly it wouldn't be a terrible moral system for a nomadic tribal people on the verge of settling civilizations in the midst of many other nomadic tribal people's doing the same. The problem is that they never really established that civilisation and their absolute insistance on their own superiority made it impossible for them to ever integrate with other groups. That ensured that their genetics kept going (although that's debatable considering modern jews are not even the jews who founded Judaism, who are mostly Muslims now) but it isolated them and genetically bottle necked them because they couldn't ever reach a large enough population to establish an actual permanent settlement anywhere. Their system makes them a tenacious leech. They really are parasites on our greater society and religion. But hey... Parasites and leeches do exist in the world. It is a viable survival strategy. Just not a moral one from our perspective.
Delon on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> But I don't think if say... You plopped a bunch of Jewish babies down somewhere with no inherited moral system that they would produce an identical or even similar moral system in the long run.


i believe they would be predisposed to such behaviors, not necessarily destined to engage in them. I agree with your thoughts otherwise
PurestEvil on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
> However, here's the kicker, the groups see their moral values as objectively correct, as universal, as THE truth.

There is an objective side to morality and it can be assessed regardless of "how things are." Philosophy isn't assessed rationally from groups anyway, rather in bundles of culture, religion, language, nationality, history.

You could argue that all groups do act according to their own interests, even jews. But the problem is that I don't have to give a shit about their interests, especially if they pursue harm against me or my people. So are jews right in their views? Doesn't matter to me. They could literally *be* God's gift to humanity, but that wouldn't change my view of them the slightest. They can talk all they want, but I won't let myself get convinced into getting killed without resistance. It might work on others though.

> That's why debates with outgroups are so useless, you're trying to argue away genetic and cultural predispositions.

Yes. As if we had to debate with jews about the jewish problem and how to bring a final solution to it. Or discuss with niggers, sandniggers, pajeets, mexiniggers about how they are worthless maggots, therefore let us deal with you please. I expect them to resist with all force available, to lie, cry, beg, betray and cheat, and it would be cynical (and foolish) to expect them to roll over and die (death is required).

As long as we can physically deal with them, we survive. Even if it's hard and tedious, requires elaborate strategies, dedication and sacrifice. The moment it's no longer possible, what is left? To operate subversively like jews in formerly OUR countries, and scheme and plot our way to gain power and wealth. That's an unclear outcome, with a terrible starting point, that can last centuries or millennia. And all the values we hold dear, we'd have to abandon, and become like jews to take back what was ours from jews (and their armies of shitskins). We'd have to adapt our religion to be like theirs, as to support the "moral" foundation that is necessary to succeed this way.

Which they btw did. Their devil worshiping, child sacrifice, out-group hating views, their tendency for communism, degeneracy, metropolitanism, race-mixing, deception, usury are the result of what they *had* to do in order to keep their identity and gain power from a position of being a quantitative minority for millennia.

It's quite possible they'd have a more lax religion and culture if they'd continue to exist in Judea, and weren't scattered all over the place, "forced" into subversion. All the most evil aspects of their being might not have manifested.

Today complete extermination is the best solution. If you do something, do it right.
fourleaved on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
If genes express themselves in people, and our most complex organ is the brain, then it follows that genetic difference will be the most pronounced in the development of the brain.

Culture is simply the expression of the groups collective brains. Divorcing it from the brain, and therefore genetics, is foolish. Europeans, with high intelligence and long-term planning can create the highest forms of art and culture to express divine beauty. Africans, with low intelligence and short-term planning just want to rape and eat each other. This is an observable reality that judeo-marxist so-called academia has been trying a hundred years to obfuscate.

Parliamentary democracy is British by genetics, which is why its influence can be seen in all the Anglo countries. Monarchy is Frankish. Fascism is Germanic. There is no debating, because non-Europeans are genetically incapable of creating culture and politics.
genesisSOC on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
It's way more simple than this.\
God made only Whites. God placed His law on our hearts. We are the only ones who follow and think with morality, as is our nature by being God's creation in His image. God never made non-Whites. They are not random genetically mutated descendants of Noah or Abraham. They are race mixed fallen angel demons with Cain, Esau and Ishmael. God hates them forever, and loves Whites forever. Morality is objective and God. Anything that isn't God or Christianity is immoral by default. Monoethnic White Christian nations is natural law. Jews are not Israelites or Hebrews and have nothing to do with the Old Testament Israel. Whites are. Jews are just literally satan pretending to be men. Jews' nature is satan, only capable of deception and evil.\
No one other than Whites deserve to live. The realistic compromise is tolerating non-Whites in their own nations, only jews have no nation therefore must be annihilated down to the babe, for no jew is "good" or "innocent."
bcfromfl on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I think this clip defining a single Hebrew word may contribute to the question you're asking: https://x.com/elongilad/status/1826217896923828499
Knight_Of_Saint_John on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
A non criminal 🤔

So he lowkey says that all israelis act like criminals?
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Nigga discovered theory of mind
Toast message