I've come up with this theory. Well, it's very likely not unique at all, but here we go : So i believe that different people groups, races for example, have certain predispositions in their thoughts and obviously actions, from either genetics or culture / upbringing, largely genetics, likely both. This leads to them having different moral values, like jews seeing it as ok to genocide every other race as long as they get to be kings, and white people largely being less ethnocentric. However, here's the kicker, the groups see their moral values as objectively correct, as universal, as THE truth. The jews will never change their morality because they see it as THE truth, as THE moral good to kill or enslave everyone else and plunder them for eternity.
That's why debates with outgroups are so useless, you're trying to argue away genetic and cultural predispositions.
What do you think? is there anything to this?
Culture is simply the expression of the groups collective brains. Divorcing it from the brain, and therefore genetics, is foolish. Europeans, with high intelligence and long-term planning can create the highest forms of art and culture to express divine beauty. Africans, with low intelligence and short-term planning just want to rape and eat each other. This is an observable reality that judeo-marxist so-called academia has been trying a hundred years to obfuscate.
Parliamentary democracy is British by genetics, which is why its influence can be seen in all the Anglo countries. Monarchy is Frankish. Fascism is Germanic. There is no debating, because non-Europeans are genetically incapable of creating culture and politics.