I've come up with this theory. Well, it's very likely not unique at all, but here we go : So i believe that different people groups, races for example, have certain predispositions in their thoughts and obviously actions, from either genetics or culture / upbringing, largely genetics, likely both. This leads to them having different moral values, like jews seeing it as ok to genocide every other race as long as they get to be kings, and white people largely being less ethnocentric. However, here's the kicker, the groups see their moral values as objectively correct, as universal, as THE truth. The jews will never change their morality because they see it as THE truth, as THE moral good to kill or enslave everyone else and plunder them for eternity.
That's why debates with outgroups are so useless, you're trying to argue away genetic and cultural predispositions.
What do you think? is there anything to this?
There is an objective side to morality and it can be assessed regardless of "how things are." Philosophy isn't assessed rationally from groups anyway, rather in bundles of culture, religion, language, nationality, history.
You could argue that all groups do act according to their own interests, even jews. But the problem is that I don't have to give a shit about their interests, especially if they pursue harm against me or my people. So are jews right in their views? Doesn't matter to me. They could literally *be* God's gift to humanity, but that wouldn't change my view of them the slightest. They can talk all they want, but I won't let myself get convinced into getting killed without resistance. It might work on others though.
> That's why debates with outgroups are so useless, you're trying to argue away genetic and cultural predispositions.
Yes. As if we had to debate with jews about the jewish problem and how to bring a final solution to it. Or discuss with niggers, sandniggers, pajeets, mexiniggers about how they are worthless maggots, therefore let us deal with you please. I expect them to resist with all force available, to lie, cry, beg, betray and cheat, and it would be cynical (and foolish) to expect them to roll over and die (death is required).
As long as we can physically deal with them, we survive. Even if it's hard and tedious, requires elaborate strategies, dedication and sacrifice. The moment it's no longer possible, what is left? To operate subversively like jews in formerly OUR countries, and scheme and plot our way to gain power and wealth. That's an unclear outcome, with a terrible starting point, that can last centuries or millennia. And all the values we hold dear, we'd have to abandon, and become like jews to take back what was ours from jews (and their armies of shitskins). We'd have to adapt our religion to be like theirs, as to support the "moral" foundation that is necessary to succeed this way.
Which they btw did. Their devil worshiping, child sacrifice, out-group hating views, their tendency for communism, degeneracy, metropolitanism, race-mixing, deception, usury are the result of what they *had* to do in order to keep their identity and gain power from a position of being a quantitative minority for millennia.
It's quite possible they'd have a more lax religion and culture if they'd continue to exist in Judea, and weren't scattered all over the place, "forced" into subversion. All the most evil aspects of their being might not have manifested.
Today complete extermination is the best solution. If you do something, do it right.