New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I've come up with this theory. Well, it's very likely not unique at all, but here we go : So i believe that different people groups, races for example, have certain predispositions in their thoughts and obviously actions, from either genetics or culture / upbringing, largely genetics, likely both. This leads to them having different moral values, like jews seeing it as ok to genocide every other race as long as they get to be kings, and white people largely being less ethnocentric. However, here's the kicker, the groups see their moral values as objectively correct, as universal, as THE truth. The jews will never change their morality because they see it as THE truth, as THE moral good to kill or enslave everyone else and plunder them for eternity.

That's why debates with outgroups are so useless, you're trying to argue away genetic and cultural predispositions.

What do you think? is there anything to this?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Tourgen on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
some people don't care. they believe what is good for them and their people is good (objective or not, doesn't matter) and what is bad for them is bad. universalism is rejected out of hand.

they'll structure their spiritual beliefs around those bedrock beliefs. so outgroup preference is strictly seen as bad, always. it's called a strength morality. strength is rewarded, cherished, encouraged. Christianity unfortunately for us is not this.
Toast message