Was I one of th' ones you blocked?
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
45 comments:
deleted
1 year ago
4 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+4Score on mirror
)
Mirrored from scored.co
>I call this "conflation propaganda" as it tries to conflate certain defamatory values with our reasonable values through malicious actor among us.
Poisoning the well is another term, and amusingly fitting considering who is probably responsible.
Poisoning the well is another term, and amusingly fitting considering who is probably responsible.
Perhaps Im looking at this wrong. Maybe these arent bad actors but rather an issue with ME creating a curates forum of only the users I agree with entirely. Many of you I had blocked share my worldview mostly, and Id just assume anyone who says such things is malicious or a subverter agent from isntrael.
Some of you may just be lost. Maybe Ill use this opportunity to make some discussion threads about the specific topics that I have gripes with.
Some of you may just be lost. Maybe Ill use this opportunity to make some discussion threads about the specific topics that I have gripes with.
> White women are all mudshark sluts
> Marriage is broken
> Therefore they should all be our SLAVES
Like, damn bro chill out. I agree they shouldnt vote but your inability to court one is a you problem. Get some muscles, get some courage, and go ask Stacy out. If she rejects you, don't go "oh shes a slut theyre all whores wah wah" no just get more muscles and more courage. If you are strong, she'll follow you. Any girl will immediately adapt your worldview and become based so long as shes attracted to you. They only thing stopping you from getting one is this attitude that theyre not worth it.
> Marriage is broken
> Therefore they should all be our SLAVES
Like, damn bro chill out. I agree they shouldnt vote but your inability to court one is a you problem. Get some muscles, get some courage, and go ask Stacy out. If she rejects you, don't go "oh shes a slut theyre all whores wah wah" no just get more muscles and more courage. If you are strong, she'll follow you. Any girl will immediately adapt your worldview and become based so long as shes attracted to you. They only thing stopping you from getting one is this attitude that theyre not worth it.
> Abortion should remain legal because blacks get them
The most morally corrupted position on it that Ive ever seen (trying to justify infanticide of millions of innocent white babies via satanic molach baal rituals).
My hatred for niggers will never outweigh my love for my people.
The most morally corrupted position on it that Ive ever seen (trying to justify infanticide of millions of innocent white babies via satanic molach baal rituals).
My hatred for niggers will never outweigh my love for my people.
> The most morally corrupted position on it that Ive ever seen (trying to justify infanticide of millions of innocent white babies via satanic molach baal rituals).
That is a fair point. But the abortion of subhumans is good, and if abortion wouldn't exist, the ratio of non-Whites would have increased even more. Would you be concerned if it's not 60% who are Whites in the US, but 50%? Isn't that sense of moral superiority a bit too costly?
Aside from that, whoever chooses to abort their children deserves to not reproduce and have their faulty bloodlines end. If leftists, kikes or whores are so willfully aborting their offspring, good - I don't want them to reproduce. I also don't mind them sterilizing themselves.
We don't need weakness to reproduce when it's strength we need.
> My hatred for niggers will never outweigh my love for my people.
These people are the liberal arts screeching feminists with blue hair who hate you, and are likely paid generously by tax money you are forced to pay, and their job is to do useless busybody jobs like forcing DEI into government and corporations.
The amount of these people is low, but to raise sympathy for these lost causes is a level of naivety we cannot afford. It's a luxury like Madonna buying niggers as pets for maximum virtue signal.
That is a fair point. But the abortion of subhumans is good, and if abortion wouldn't exist, the ratio of non-Whites would have increased even more. Would you be concerned if it's not 60% who are Whites in the US, but 50%? Isn't that sense of moral superiority a bit too costly?
Aside from that, whoever chooses to abort their children deserves to not reproduce and have their faulty bloodlines end. If leftists, kikes or whores are so willfully aborting their offspring, good - I don't want them to reproduce. I also don't mind them sterilizing themselves.
We don't need weakness to reproduce when it's strength we need.
> My hatred for niggers will never outweigh my love for my people.
These people are the liberal arts screeching feminists with blue hair who hate you, and are likely paid generously by tax money you are forced to pay, and their job is to do useless busybody jobs like forcing DEI into government and corporations.
The amount of these people is low, but to raise sympathy for these lost causes is a level of naivety we cannot afford. It's a luxury like Madonna buying niggers as pets for maximum virtue signal.
The ONLY reason blacks get more abortions is bc they use it as a form of birth control. They are irresponsible. **80% of all abortions are done of women who have had one prior.** So white women, who make the majority of women in america, also make up the majority of new women getting abortions. You are just wrong when it comes to numbers.
And even if you were right, it doesnt justify the murder or innocent children. Even if it somehow prevented demographic changes. The murder of a million children annually is unacceptable.
> Those babies are from liberal arts screeching feminists so its okay to kill them
Children do not hold political positions. Even if they did, we wouldn't kill them for it.
Lets talk actual figures. Tell me, in your opinion, exactly how many black babies need to be murdered for every white baby murdered for it to be justified?
Really ask yourself that. **How many black babies need to be murdered for the murder of a white baby to be justified?**
Because that is your logic. Correct me of Im wrong, but is that not your position? That the satantic ritual murders of innocent babies are justified because "blacks get them more". So, elaborate and tell me the exact ratio for it to be justified.
And even if you were right, it doesnt justify the murder or innocent children. Even if it somehow prevented demographic changes. The murder of a million children annually is unacceptable.
> Those babies are from liberal arts screeching feminists so its okay to kill them
Children do not hold political positions. Even if they did, we wouldn't kill them for it.
Lets talk actual figures. Tell me, in your opinion, exactly how many black babies need to be murdered for every white baby murdered for it to be justified?
Really ask yourself that. **How many black babies need to be murdered for the murder of a white baby to be justified?**
Because that is your logic. Correct me of Im wrong, but is that not your position? That the satantic ritual murders of innocent babies are justified because "blacks get them more". So, elaborate and tell me the exact ratio for it to be justified.
> Children do not hold political positions. Even if they did, we wouldn't kill them for it.
In most cases children become like their parents. That is genetically intended. If I have children, you can be quite sure they will be similar to me, as my wife would be as well. I would want them to adopt my positive traits and not have my negative ones, but ultimately it's most likely they'll inherit (genetically and socially) both.
So the political positions of my children will be some kind of right wing, ranging from Libertarian to NatSoc. If you were a staunch leftist, you wouldn't want me to reproduce, because it would increase the number of your opponents.
And I expect blue haired feminist freaks to mold their children into ideological extensions of themselves. The idea of every child being a "tabula rasa" is wishful thinking, just as "equality" is.
> Tell me, in your opinion, exactly how many black babies need to be murdered for every white baby murdered for it to be justified?
It's a weird question. Those who abort their babies aren't people I'd want to reproduce anyway. So I don't see a big problem there. If I'd be able to reduce the reproduction of niggers in exchange for reducing the reproduction of leftist Whites, I'd gladly accept.
If it's about conservatives, moderates, Christians or other sane Whites, I'd see it as a sacrifice or a bad outcome. I wouldn't want them to have abortions, but I'd accept that there is a utilitarian purpose (in this scenario). For them the number would be at least ~100.
If each leftist abortion causes ~10 abortions of blacks, I'd consider it ideal. The more, the better, the less, the worse, but the number can go either way. I wouldn't want to go lower than ~4 though.
In most cases children become like their parents. That is genetically intended. If I have children, you can be quite sure they will be similar to me, as my wife would be as well. I would want them to adopt my positive traits and not have my negative ones, but ultimately it's most likely they'll inherit (genetically and socially) both.
So the political positions of my children will be some kind of right wing, ranging from Libertarian to NatSoc. If you were a staunch leftist, you wouldn't want me to reproduce, because it would increase the number of your opponents.
And I expect blue haired feminist freaks to mold their children into ideological extensions of themselves. The idea of every child being a "tabula rasa" is wishful thinking, just as "equality" is.
> Tell me, in your opinion, exactly how many black babies need to be murdered for every white baby murdered for it to be justified?
It's a weird question. Those who abort their babies aren't people I'd want to reproduce anyway. So I don't see a big problem there. If I'd be able to reduce the reproduction of niggers in exchange for reducing the reproduction of leftist Whites, I'd gladly accept.
If it's about conservatives, moderates, Christians or other sane Whites, I'd see it as a sacrifice or a bad outcome. I wouldn't want them to have abortions, but I'd accept that there is a utilitarian purpose (in this scenario). For them the number would be at least ~100.
If each leftist abortion causes ~10 abortions of blacks, I'd consider it ideal. The more, the better, the less, the worse, but the number can go either way. I wouldn't want to go lower than ~4 though.
Okay so you value an innocent white baby at about 4x that of a black baby. And if I convince you that babies do not in fact inherit the political worldviews of their parents as paradigms are not genetic, you would value an innocent white baby at 100x that of a black baby.
If you had a magic button that killed 100 random niggers but also killed 1 random white person, would you press it?
I don't think we are gonna find common ground here. This is the most morally corrupted take on abortion by a mile. Putting figures to it shows how evil this mindset is. You couldve said 1000 or 1 million and it still would've meant that you want systematic ritualistic legal infanticide in your country because white babies being murdered is worth more black babies being murdered. But you said 100, so shameful. Im shocked by how heartless you are.
My position is clear. It is infanticide. It is a satanic ritual. It exists so jews can harvest goyim organs and cells to be turned into HEK "flavoring", vaccines, cosmetics, homunculus experiments and bioprocessors. It should not be tolerated in our countries. No exceptions.
I dont want other culturea doing it either. Would you say "cannibalism is good because blacks do it more than whites"?
If you had a magic button that killed 100 random niggers but also killed 1 random white person, would you press it?
I don't think we are gonna find common ground here. This is the most morally corrupted take on abortion by a mile. Putting figures to it shows how evil this mindset is. You couldve said 1000 or 1 million and it still would've meant that you want systematic ritualistic legal infanticide in your country because white babies being murdered is worth more black babies being murdered. But you said 100, so shameful. Im shocked by how heartless you are.
My position is clear. It is infanticide. It is a satanic ritual. It exists so jews can harvest goyim organs and cells to be turned into HEK "flavoring", vaccines, cosmetics, homunculus experiments and bioprocessors. It should not be tolerated in our countries. No exceptions.
I dont want other culturea doing it either. Would you say "cannibalism is good because blacks do it more than whites"?
> Cull the pitbulls
What the fuck? Like seriously what the fuck? It's one thing to use dog attacks based on breed as an analogy for violent crime rates based on race, but to advocate the abuse of innocent animals is too far. I get that it's a metaphor for niggers but pitbulls are 1000x better than niggers in every way.
What the fuck? Like seriously what the fuck? It's one thing to use dog attacks based on breed as an analogy for violent crime rates based on race, but to advocate the abuse of innocent animals is too far. I get that it's a metaphor for niggers but pitbulls are 1000x better than niggers in every way.
> but to advocate the abuse of innocent animals is too far
Here you inject appeal to emotion by assuming it's "abuse", and bringing up "innocent" like it's a matter of justice. Guilt is irrelevant, and to insist on guilt is a matter of individual selection - aka you do *nothing* unless a pitbull mauls someone. What if 10% of pitbulls would maul a human at some point? How many human lives are you willing to sacrifice for your ideas of morality?
> but pitbulls are 1000x better than niggers in every way.
Unless the niggers are the ones owning the pitbulls. They are like loose cannons. My Golden Retriever is a sweetheart and never does anything against any human, no matter the age. If she runs towards a child, I don't have to hope that she won't maul him. With a pitbull, just out of bad luck, a lack of you holding the leash, an error in your judgement might be the brutal death of a child.
Pitbulls are genetically predisposed to be aggressive and violent, and even if you train them well, they can still "unexpectedly" snap.
Here you inject appeal to emotion by assuming it's "abuse", and bringing up "innocent" like it's a matter of justice. Guilt is irrelevant, and to insist on guilt is a matter of individual selection - aka you do *nothing* unless a pitbull mauls someone. What if 10% of pitbulls would maul a human at some point? How many human lives are you willing to sacrifice for your ideas of morality?
> but pitbulls are 1000x better than niggers in every way.
Unless the niggers are the ones owning the pitbulls. They are like loose cannons. My Golden Retriever is a sweetheart and never does anything against any human, no matter the age. If she runs towards a child, I don't have to hope that she won't maul him. With a pitbull, just out of bad luck, a lack of you holding the leash, an error in your judgement might be the brutal death of a child.
Pitbulls are genetically predisposed to be aggressive and violent, and even if you train them well, they can still "unexpectedly" snap.
Some animals are potentially dangerous and require a responsible trainer. Pitbulls are often raised to be violent, basically abused by niggers who train them for dogfighting. Due to their strength, the breed is chosen by dogfighters and that is the main reason pitbulls are the most dangerous breed. Idiot women go "rescue" a killing machine who'd been trained to maul and decide to put their baby next to it for a cute picture. These abused dogs are beyond rehabilitation and should not be adopted into families with children.
However, a Pitbull puppy raised right and trained well can be an excellent dog even for families with children. That dog isnt going to "snap".
I agree that the breed is more aggressive and dangerous but their overrepresentation in attacks is moreso caused by nurture than nature. Solve dogfighting (make it illegal for niggers to own dogs) and the problem will be solved.
However, a Pitbull puppy raised right and trained well can be an excellent dog even for families with children. That dog isnt going to "snap".
I agree that the breed is more aggressive and dangerous but their overrepresentation in attacks is moreso caused by nurture than nature. Solve dogfighting (make it illegal for niggers to own dogs) and the problem will be solved.
> in attacks is moreso caused by nurture than nature
Maybe. But we are talking about ~60% of all dog attacks caused by pitbulls. I don't know how prevalent dogfighting is which causes them to behave that way, and how often it's the fault of the dog's owner, but I would NEVER pick a pitpull as a family dog - because what if it's actually mostly genetic? I mean we are talking about a *massive* statistical extreme. And if I see a pitpull, I'll be very aware of potential conflict.
> and the problem will be solved.
And what if it isn't, and just gets *slightly* better?
Maybe. But we are talking about ~60% of all dog attacks caused by pitbulls. I don't know how prevalent dogfighting is which causes them to behave that way, and how often it's the fault of the dog's owner, but I would NEVER pick a pitpull as a family dog - because what if it's actually mostly genetic? I mean we are talking about a *massive* statistical extreme. And if I see a pitpull, I'll be very aware of potential conflict.
> and the problem will be solved.
And what if it isn't, and just gets *slightly* better?
Go to your local dog shelter. All of them will be pitbulls. They are the most abused and abandoned breed there is. When poor families go to get a dog, they don't pay a breeder, they go to the shelter where usually the options are only pitbulls. And they don't know any better, kids want a dog, this dog looks cute, we can afford him so he's coming home. Then it attacks the kid because they got in between him and his food bowl because the dog had to fight for survival his entire life.
I know firsthand how it is at shelters. It's not just most of the dogs are pitbulls. It's not 60% or 80% or 90%, it is 100%. All of the dogs are pitbulls. And they are all dangerous. Sometimes, very very rarely, we will see another victimized dog like a boxer or doberman. Same story with them, these breeds get bad reputations because they are abused and then rehomed without considering the consequences.
Im positive that pitbulls are great dogs because Ive met many great pitbulls. If you get one as a puppy and train it right than he'll be a great dog and you'll have nothing to worry about. In fact I dont think any dog trained right from puppyhood is going to snap and attack a child unless it was demented somehow.
The nature of the breed, like how naturally aggressive they are, plays a tiny role compared to the nuture of the dog, like whether it was raised responsibly as a companion or grew up fighting for survival.
I know firsthand how it is at shelters. It's not just most of the dogs are pitbulls. It's not 60% or 80% or 90%, it is 100%. All of the dogs are pitbulls. And they are all dangerous. Sometimes, very very rarely, we will see another victimized dog like a boxer or doberman. Same story with them, these breeds get bad reputations because they are abused and then rehomed without considering the consequences.
Im positive that pitbulls are great dogs because Ive met many great pitbulls. If you get one as a puppy and train it right than he'll be a great dog and you'll have nothing to worry about. In fact I dont think any dog trained right from puppyhood is going to snap and attack a child unless it was demented somehow.
The nature of the breed, like how naturally aggressive they are, plays a tiny role compared to the nuture of the dog, like whether it was raised responsibly as a companion or grew up fighting for survival.
> but rather an issue with ME creating a curates forum of only the users I agree with entirely
What's the point in never having to contest your values even slightly? This isn't a "safe space", and this isn't a hivemind, and there is no point to enforce it. We have differing opinions, but there are essential commonalities.
For example people do not believe in equality, they notice the jew, they like to speak freely. And we also share certain thoughts - for example "faggot" can be used as an umbrella term for all types of degeneracy, just as "niggers" can be used as an umbrella term for all types of subhumans.
I personally enjoy disagreements and debates. That's the best way to get closer to truth. I even like to read people debating with each other (if it's not something boring). To be able to debate better also improves the ability to navigate conversations and explain better.
What's the point in never having to contest your values even slightly? This isn't a "safe space", and this isn't a hivemind, and there is no point to enforce it. We have differing opinions, but there are essential commonalities.
For example people do not believe in equality, they notice the jew, they like to speak freely. And we also share certain thoughts - for example "faggot" can be used as an umbrella term for all types of degeneracy, just as "niggers" can be used as an umbrella term for all types of subhumans.
I personally enjoy disagreements and debates. That's the best way to get closer to truth. I even like to read people debating with each other (if it's not something boring). To be able to debate better also improves the ability to navigate conversations and explain better.
> TND / TKD
Genocidal statements created in mindwar to attack and successfully silence two of our strongest power-memes.
"TNB" existed for years before mossad started infiltrating our forums with this nonsense. TNB was something you could say to your white friend in public whenever you see a migger acting like a nigger. It stands for "Typical Nigger Behavior". It was a way for people to comment on mainstream media posts and point out race without getting censored. Basically, if you saw a jew at the grocery store trying to negotiate with expired coupons, you would say to your friend "TKB" and youd both get a laugh.
Incedibly powerful meme. Bet some of you guys didnt even know due to the successful "TND" infiltration propaganda.
Another thing is that I dont hate blacks in general, I only hate what threatens what I love. So I hate displaced nigger rappists in my country, but I dont hate the African in Africa.
Genocidal statements created in mindwar to attack and successfully silence two of our strongest power-memes.
"TNB" existed for years before mossad started infiltrating our forums with this nonsense. TNB was something you could say to your white friend in public whenever you see a migger acting like a nigger. It stands for "Typical Nigger Behavior". It was a way for people to comment on mainstream media posts and point out race without getting censored. Basically, if you saw a jew at the grocery store trying to negotiate with expired coupons, you would say to your friend "TKB" and youd both get a laugh.
Incedibly powerful meme. Bet some of you guys didnt even know due to the successful "TND" infiltration propaganda.
Another thing is that I dont hate blacks in general, I only hate what threatens what I love. So I hate displaced nigger rappists in my country, but I dont hate the African in Africa.
> due to the successful "TND" infiltration propaganda.
The complete eradication of niggers is a welcome act. What do you think *has* to happen if we collectively get our shit together and retake our countries? We remove the jew from all positions of power, we remove that extreme amount of welfare which transfers massive amounts of resources from Whites to non-Whites, and then the niggers will be even more violent, more aggressive, more looty, more rapey.
So either you pay up forever White man, or you deal with the problem - having to deal with permanent blackmail, permanent subjugation to the whims of feral niggers, who require you to appease them with gibs. Plus jews who fuel all of that, while pocketing most of it for themselves.
TND is ***inevitable***. It's either that, or the total death of our kind. Btw, they (along with Arabs and jews) openly shout for Whitey to be killed IN OUR COUNTRIES.
To think that TND is somehow an "infiltration propaganda" is nonsense. The idea of TND simply got very popular. Or do you think we are wrong for hating niggers with a passion? Do you think YOU are the one with the "right" opinion, and everyone who deviates from it is mislead? As if the permanent cocksucking of niggers is the "right thing to do"? To give in to bullies forever?
> but I dont hate the African in Africa.
To think "hate" is relevant is just an emotional appeal. It's a leftist label to discard criticism and opposition by portraying it as emotional, thus irrational and racist, thus bigoted, thus stupid and false.
It is a question of necessity and what is best for our people.
The complete eradication of niggers is a welcome act. What do you think *has* to happen if we collectively get our shit together and retake our countries? We remove the jew from all positions of power, we remove that extreme amount of welfare which transfers massive amounts of resources from Whites to non-Whites, and then the niggers will be even more violent, more aggressive, more looty, more rapey.
So either you pay up forever White man, or you deal with the problem - having to deal with permanent blackmail, permanent subjugation to the whims of feral niggers, who require you to appease them with gibs. Plus jews who fuel all of that, while pocketing most of it for themselves.
TND is ***inevitable***. It's either that, or the total death of our kind. Btw, they (along with Arabs and jews) openly shout for Whitey to be killed IN OUR COUNTRIES.
To think that TND is somehow an "infiltration propaganda" is nonsense. The idea of TND simply got very popular. Or do you think we are wrong for hating niggers with a passion? Do you think YOU are the one with the "right" opinion, and everyone who deviates from it is mislead? As if the permanent cocksucking of niggers is the "right thing to do"? To give in to bullies forever?
> but I dont hate the African in Africa.
To think "hate" is relevant is just an emotional appeal. It's a leftist label to discard criticism and opposition by portraying it as emotional, thus irrational and racist, thus bigoted, thus stupid and false.
It is a question of necessity and what is best for our people.
There is deportation and segregation among other options, nothing is "inevitable". This propaganda is the #1 prime example of infiltration propaganda as it is designed to scare away young minds who are justing trying to learn. Holobunga propaganda is literally trauma induced (showing kids pixtures of malnourished corpses) and the notion of genocide is THE #1 trigger to normies like a Manchurian candidate hearing the password. Any suggestion even in the slightest would by design cause intense cognitive dissonance and scare people away from the movement.
That is the point of the propaganda, to pry at past traumas of potential new members and to turn blackpilled cynics into soldiers for that very same cause.
60 years is how long we have had integration. Only 60 years. less than 3 generations. Before then, blacks had their own neighborhoods and their violent crime rates were **lower** than the national average. Black Americans were at one point seen as the moral pinnacle of American culture, they had the lowest rates of divorce, alcoholism, gambling and other vices. Leftists never talk about this. They will focus on the problems now (blacks lack independence and lash out for it) but demand more of what causes those problems (handouts from whites).
History has shown us that if we simply stop paying for blacks to live, they will find ways to live on their own. If they are judged in a system that is actually fair, than they will actually work, raise their children, and make honest attempts at becoming civilized if only to compete our standards.
Furthermore, the concept of fighting for your people and defending your race can be easily expressed without genocidal implications that ultimately hurt the movement. I remember when I was a kid first looking into Zionism and it was some idiot advocating for genocide that turned me away and delayed my awaking for YEARS due to a deep discomfort around the topic (the intentional outcome of early holobunga trauma).
That is the point of the propaganda, to pry at past traumas of potential new members and to turn blackpilled cynics into soldiers for that very same cause.
60 years is how long we have had integration. Only 60 years. less than 3 generations. Before then, blacks had their own neighborhoods and their violent crime rates were **lower** than the national average. Black Americans were at one point seen as the moral pinnacle of American culture, they had the lowest rates of divorce, alcoholism, gambling and other vices. Leftists never talk about this. They will focus on the problems now (blacks lack independence and lash out for it) but demand more of what causes those problems (handouts from whites).
History has shown us that if we simply stop paying for blacks to live, they will find ways to live on their own. If they are judged in a system that is actually fair, than they will actually work, raise their children, and make honest attempts at becoming civilized if only to compete our standards.
Furthermore, the concept of fighting for your people and defending your race can be easily expressed without genocidal implications that ultimately hurt the movement. I remember when I was a kid first looking into Zionism and it was some idiot advocating for genocide that turned me away and delayed my awaking for YEARS due to a deep discomfort around the topic (the intentional outcome of early holobunga trauma).
> There is deportation and segregation among other options
Segregation means concede land of Whites to non-Whites, further causing us to escape away from the "diversity." After a while someone has the brilliant idea to import non-Whites again, because "diversity is our strength", and then we resolve it again, further conceding land.
Deportation will turn into race wars. You can start to deport niggers, but after a short time they will become violent, which easily turns into a war. What follows is violence back and forth, which further escalates.
And both merely delay the problem.
> showing kids pixtures of malnourished corpses
For me it had an opposite effect. In school my friends and I drew a lot in our work books... if there was a face, sure as hell that person got an SS uniform or a lever to operate, or an artist's mustache. When the teacher came over I just calmly scrolled over to a clean site as if I was contemplating something.
But I see your point, and I guess that what happens most of the time.
> Black Americans were at one point seen as the moral pinnacle of American culture
If true at all, and if it was, it was a fleeting temporary state upheld by society putting a lot of pressure on them to behave well. Temporary, as in they rebound to their nature state.
> History has shown us that if we simply stop paying for blacks to live, they will find ways to live on their own.
Sure, but TND is a meme that goes beyond that. It's often said casually or in jest, especially when there is another case of a violent nigger mauling some White person, like beating elderly. It's 3 letters that perfectly conveys the distaste of niggers and a willingness to go to the extreme to deal with them. Anything above giving them infinite handouts is a welcome course of action.
> and it was some idiot advocating for genocide
There are better and worse ways to convince. There could have been 100 other things that would have done the same, like saying how there are also Whites who behave like them, so it would be unfair to point the fingers solely at jews... or it's some cabal, or their average IQ is higher, which is the reason they occupy so many positions of power and influence, etc.
I didn't care about genocide, I focused more on logic and facts. If someone would say he wanted to kill all jews, I'd ask why, or would argue against him. Or find it funny, but still be neutral and curious. And if he provided evidence, I'd have looked into it - what made him think that?
For me all it took is evidence of the Ashkenazim jew's average IQ being a lie (110-115), their involvement in the Transatlantic Slave Trade, their involvement in communism and the genocides against White Christians, their extreme prevalence to be leftists, and that the average Joe (Cohen) was a leftist of some sorts. If someone would have presented me this information, I would have opposed jews overnight.
My point being - you might be against the idea of genocide/ethnic cleansing, but others might value other things, and might not be bothered by such ideas, or not be "traumatized" in such ways. For me the average jew IQ lie was a problem, a delay, and it was a matter of facts.
Segregation means concede land of Whites to non-Whites, further causing us to escape away from the "diversity." After a while someone has the brilliant idea to import non-Whites again, because "diversity is our strength", and then we resolve it again, further conceding land.
Deportation will turn into race wars. You can start to deport niggers, but after a short time they will become violent, which easily turns into a war. What follows is violence back and forth, which further escalates.
And both merely delay the problem.
> showing kids pixtures of malnourished corpses
For me it had an opposite effect. In school my friends and I drew a lot in our work books... if there was a face, sure as hell that person got an SS uniform or a lever to operate, or an artist's mustache. When the teacher came over I just calmly scrolled over to a clean site as if I was contemplating something.
But I see your point, and I guess that what happens most of the time.
> Black Americans were at one point seen as the moral pinnacle of American culture
If true at all, and if it was, it was a fleeting temporary state upheld by society putting a lot of pressure on them to behave well. Temporary, as in they rebound to their nature state.
> History has shown us that if we simply stop paying for blacks to live, they will find ways to live on their own.
Sure, but TND is a meme that goes beyond that. It's often said casually or in jest, especially when there is another case of a violent nigger mauling some White person, like beating elderly. It's 3 letters that perfectly conveys the distaste of niggers and a willingness to go to the extreme to deal with them. Anything above giving them infinite handouts is a welcome course of action.
> and it was some idiot advocating for genocide
There are better and worse ways to convince. There could have been 100 other things that would have done the same, like saying how there are also Whites who behave like them, so it would be unfair to point the fingers solely at jews... or it's some cabal, or their average IQ is higher, which is the reason they occupy so many positions of power and influence, etc.
I didn't care about genocide, I focused more on logic and facts. If someone would say he wanted to kill all jews, I'd ask why, or would argue against him. Or find it funny, but still be neutral and curious. And if he provided evidence, I'd have looked into it - what made him think that?
For me all it took is evidence of the Ashkenazim jew's average IQ being a lie (110-115), their involvement in the Transatlantic Slave Trade, their involvement in communism and the genocides against White Christians, their extreme prevalence to be leftists, and that the average Joe (Cohen) was a leftist of some sorts. If someone would have presented me this information, I would have opposed jews overnight.
My point being - you might be against the idea of genocide/ethnic cleansing, but others might value other things, and might not be bothered by such ideas, or not be "traumatized" in such ways. For me the average jew IQ lie was a problem, a delay, and it was a matter of facts.
Abortion is something I'm wholly cynical about, not because I don't think it's important, but because I think it's something that no politician who falls under the umbrella of "conservative" or "republican" actually wants to fix because it's a slam dunk way to get $$$/votes and/or perpetuates the good cop/bad cop ruse.
Abortion dovetails nicely with your point about "women's sovereignty" (which TBH sounds like BS drivel to me) because one of the things that the "pro life" side of abortion is unwilling to confront is the fact that in order to be "pro life" you have to tell women "no you are not allowed to murder your unborn child".
I've always thought that "pro life" is pitted against "pro choice" and depending on how you break things down, "pro life" = "anti choice" and "pro choice" = "anti life". However, because the right is so petrified of telling women what they can and can't do, the "pro life" movement is DOA. Just be honest and say, "We are telling women they can't have an abortion, and whether or not it's 'their body' is irrelevant".
However, I do hate MGTOW and their bitterness. The irony is that people who are actually going their own way don't have to tell everyone they're doing it ***without women***. Before the internet, you were just a bachelor doing your thing and you didn't have to say "I took a Sunday afternoon motorcycle ride **WITHOUT A WOMAN**" or "I grilled some hamburgers while enjoying a cold one **WITHOUT THE COMPANY OF A WOMAN**."
The rest of ConPro just "is what it is".
Abortion dovetails nicely with your point about "women's sovereignty" (which TBH sounds like BS drivel to me) because one of the things that the "pro life" side of abortion is unwilling to confront is the fact that in order to be "pro life" you have to tell women "no you are not allowed to murder your unborn child".
I've always thought that "pro life" is pitted against "pro choice" and depending on how you break things down, "pro life" = "anti choice" and "pro choice" = "anti life". However, because the right is so petrified of telling women what they can and can't do, the "pro life" movement is DOA. Just be honest and say, "We are telling women they can't have an abortion, and whether or not it's 'their body' is irrelevant".
However, I do hate MGTOW and their bitterness. The irony is that people who are actually going their own way don't have to tell everyone they're doing it ***without women***. Before the internet, you were just a bachelor doing your thing and you didn't have to say "I took a Sunday afternoon motorcycle ride **WITHOUT A WOMAN**" or "I grilled some hamburgers while enjoying a cold one **WITHOUT THE COMPANY OF A WOMAN**."
The rest of ConPro just "is what it is".
This is exactly what Im talking about. Can't give a clear position, instead give an elaborate explaination about how it doesnt matter. I get too tired to debate with some people sometimes. I guess Ill try.
1. A million innocent babies are murdered annually in america alone. You are either okay with this or you are not okay with it. There is no third position, no in between, no fence to sit on. If your position is that it doesnt matter, than you are okay with it. If your position is that itll never change, than you are okay with it. This is EXACTLY what I mean when I say users mix in degeneracy, I will always call it out until I realize the user is bettter off blocked. Any position in between is still okay with allowing it. Be brave.
2. You got it upside down. Pro choice was a term to attack the Christians against infanticide, implying that they were against "choice". And then the response, pro life, implies that the other side is against life.
1. A million innocent babies are murdered annually in america alone. You are either okay with this or you are not okay with it. There is no third position, no in between, no fence to sit on. If your position is that it doesnt matter, than you are okay with it. If your position is that itll never change, than you are okay with it. This is EXACTLY what I mean when I say users mix in degeneracy, I will always call it out until I realize the user is bettter off blocked. Any position in between is still okay with allowing it. Be brave.
2. You got it upside down. Pro choice was a term to attack the Christians against infanticide, implying that they were against "choice". And then the response, pro life, implies that the other side is against life.
You're stuck up your own ass and have the reading comprehension of a 2nd grader.
This is why I block people. How is anything you say gonna have any value to me if I know you also support infanticide? Why would I give someone so morally corrupted any of my attention?
Maybe the way I worded my statement was less than clear so please allow me to state what I believe in plain language.
- Abortion should be illegal and considered murder.
- People who willingly participate in abortion (whether it be the mother or "doctor") should be considered murderers and be sentenced as such.
- In order to enforce this, it requires taking away the "choice" of the mother (or whoever wants to abort the pregnancy) by telling her "no, it is not OK to murder an unborn child".
The cynical part of me thinks that people (politicians) on the right have no intention of actually prohibiting abortion because (at least in the state I live in) the "pro life" coalitions shoot down meaningful pro-life legislation in favor of laws and amendments that do nothing to curtail abortion because of the amount of "exceptions" they put in it.
I think politicians on the right have a vested interest in *not* fixing the abortion issue because if they did, it would mean they have to find some other watershed issue to campaign on.
Sorry for my last comment. You have some good points.
- Abortion should be illegal and considered murder.
- People who willingly participate in abortion (whether it be the mother or "doctor") should be considered murderers and be sentenced as such.
- In order to enforce this, it requires taking away the "choice" of the mother (or whoever wants to abort the pregnancy) by telling her "no, it is not OK to murder an unborn child".
The cynical part of me thinks that people (politicians) on the right have no intention of actually prohibiting abortion because (at least in the state I live in) the "pro life" coalitions shoot down meaningful pro-life legislation in favor of laws and amendments that do nothing to curtail abortion because of the amount of "exceptions" they put in it.
I think politicians on the right have a vested interest in *not* fixing the abortion issue because if they did, it would mean they have to find some other watershed issue to campaign on.
Sorry for my last comment. You have some good points.
I think the reason poljticians don't tackle abortion is even simpler than that, because if they took strong positions against it or fufilled campaign promises regarding them, their voter support would increase. So I think the reason is (((donatjions))) and a special relijion that has huge influence in our government.
Toast message