I made a new account (weimersolutions / heagleart) and realized just how curated my old feed was because I must have blocked more than half of you guys. And seeing conpro in it's raw state, I noticed that tge specific users that I blocked myself from seeing are still here and just as active or more than the "real conpro" as I used to view it.
Here's the thing, these users' posts seem to get traction when it is something that aligns with our values, but will then mix it with things that definitely do not such as abortion, the complete destruction of women's sovereignty, or genocidal suggestions. I call this "conflation propaganda" as it tries to conflate certain defamatory values with our reasonable values through malicious actor among us.
Also I dont think the main target is the new users to scare them off, while that may be part of it, I think that we are the main targets of this propaganda. A user makes some reposts from a few months prior, and then he's "in" and ready to begin directly twisting our values. Often it is a pagan trying to delegitimize the moral superiority of Christianity or a mgtow meninist blaming white women (specifically white) while disregarding their jewish brainwashing. I think it's an attempt to lure our younger members off the conpro path (of learning the jq and embracing independence over consumerism) with an edgy, "hot take" that more aligns with the kike paradigm.
That is the point of the propaganda, to pry at past traumas of potential new members and to turn blackpilled cynics into soldiers for that very same cause.
60 years is how long we have had integration. Only 60 years. less than 3 generations. Before then, blacks had their own neighborhoods and their violent crime rates were **lower** than the national average. Black Americans were at one point seen as the moral pinnacle of American culture, they had the lowest rates of divorce, alcoholism, gambling and other vices. Leftists never talk about this. They will focus on the problems now (blacks lack independence and lash out for it) but demand more of what causes those problems (handouts from whites).
History has shown us that if we simply stop paying for blacks to live, they will find ways to live on their own. If they are judged in a system that is actually fair, than they will actually work, raise their children, and make honest attempts at becoming civilized if only to compete our standards.
Furthermore, the concept of fighting for your people and defending your race can be easily expressed without genocidal implications that ultimately hurt the movement. I remember when I was a kid first looking into Zionism and it was some idiot advocating for genocide that turned me away and delayed my awaking for YEARS due to a deep discomfort around the topic (the intentional outcome of early holobunga trauma).
Segregation means concede land of Whites to non-Whites, further causing us to escape away from the "diversity." After a while someone has the brilliant idea to import non-Whites again, because "diversity is our strength", and then we resolve it again, further conceding land.
Deportation will turn into race wars. You can start to deport niggers, but after a short time they will become violent, which easily turns into a war. What follows is violence back and forth, which further escalates.
And both merely delay the problem.
> showing kids pixtures of malnourished corpses
For me it had an opposite effect. In school my friends and I drew a lot in our work books... if there was a face, sure as hell that person got an SS uniform or a lever to operate, or an artist's mustache. When the teacher came over I just calmly scrolled over to a clean site as if I was contemplating something.
But I see your point, and I guess that what happens most of the time.
> Black Americans were at one point seen as the moral pinnacle of American culture
If true at all, and if it was, it was a fleeting temporary state upheld by society putting a lot of pressure on them to behave well. Temporary, as in they rebound to their nature state.
> History has shown us that if we simply stop paying for blacks to live, they will find ways to live on their own.
Sure, but TND is a meme that goes beyond that. It's often said casually or in jest, especially when there is another case of a violent nigger mauling some White person, like beating elderly. It's 3 letters that perfectly conveys the distaste of niggers and a willingness to go to the extreme to deal with them. Anything above giving them infinite handouts is a welcome course of action.
> and it was some idiot advocating for genocide
There are better and worse ways to convince. There could have been 100 other things that would have done the same, like saying how there are also Whites who behave like them, so it would be unfair to point the fingers solely at jews... or it's some cabal, or their average IQ is higher, which is the reason they occupy so many positions of power and influence, etc.
I didn't care about genocide, I focused more on logic and facts. If someone would say he wanted to kill all jews, I'd ask why, or would argue against him. Or find it funny, but still be neutral and curious. And if he provided evidence, I'd have looked into it - what made him think that?
For me all it took is evidence of the Ashkenazim jew's average IQ being a lie (110-115), their involvement in the Transatlantic Slave Trade, their involvement in communism and the genocides against White Christians, their extreme prevalence to be leftists, and that the average Joe (Cohen) was a leftist of some sorts. If someone would have presented me this information, I would have opposed jews overnight.
My point being - you might be against the idea of genocide/ethnic cleansing, but others might value other things, and might not be bothered by such ideas, or not be "traumatized" in such ways. For me the average jew IQ lie was a problem, a delay, and it was a matter of facts.