New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I made a new account (weimersolutions / heagleart) and realized just how curated my old feed was because I must have blocked more than half of you guys. And seeing conpro in it's raw state, I noticed that tge specific users that I blocked myself from seeing are still here and just as active or more than the "real conpro" as I used to view it.

Here's the thing, these users' posts seem to get traction when it is something that aligns with our values, but will then mix it with things that definitely do not such as abortion, the complete destruction of women's sovereignty, or genocidal suggestions. I call this "conflation propaganda" as it tries to conflate certain defamatory values with our reasonable values through malicious actor among us.

Also I dont think the main target is the new users to scare them off, while that may be part of it, I think that we are the main targets of this propaganda. A user makes some reposts from a few months prior, and then he's "in" and ready to begin directly twisting our values. Often it is a pagan trying to delegitimize the moral superiority of Christianity or a mgtow meninist blaming white women (specifically white) while disregarding their jewish brainwashing. I think it's an attempt to lure our younger members off the conpro path (of learning the jq and embracing independence over consumerism) with an edgy, "hot take" that more aligns with the kike paradigm.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
LawrysSeasonedSoap on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> Abortion should remain legal because blacks get them

The most morally corrupted position on it that Ive ever seen (trying to justify infanticide of millions of innocent white babies via satanic molach baal rituals).

My hatred for niggers will never outweigh my love for my people.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> The most morally corrupted position on it that Ive ever seen (trying to justify infanticide of millions of innocent white babies via satanic molach baal rituals).

That is a fair point. But the abortion of subhumans is good, and if abortion wouldn't exist, the ratio of non-Whites would have increased even more. Would you be concerned if it's not 60% who are Whites in the US, but 50%? Isn't that sense of moral superiority a bit too costly?

Aside from that, whoever chooses to abort their children deserves to not reproduce and have their faulty bloodlines end. If leftists, kikes or whores are so willfully aborting their offspring, good - I don't want them to reproduce. I also don't mind them sterilizing themselves.

We don't need weakness to reproduce when it's strength we need.

> My hatred for niggers will never outweigh my love for my people.

These people are the liberal arts screeching feminists with blue hair who hate you, and are likely paid generously by tax money you are forced to pay, and their job is to do useless busybody jobs like forcing DEI into government and corporations.

The amount of these people is low, but to raise sympathy for these lost causes is a level of naivety we cannot afford. It's a luxury like Madonna buying niggers as pets for maximum virtue signal.
LawrysSeasonedSoap on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The ONLY reason blacks get more abortions is bc they use it as a form of birth control. They are irresponsible. **80% of all abortions are done of women who have had one prior.** So white women, who make the majority of women in america, also make up the majority of new women getting abortions. You are just wrong when it comes to numbers.

And even if you were right, it doesnt justify the murder or innocent children. Even if it somehow prevented demographic changes. The murder of a million children annually is unacceptable.

> Those babies are from liberal arts screeching feminists so its okay to kill them

Children do not hold political positions. Even if they did, we wouldn't kill them for it.

Lets talk actual figures. Tell me, in your opinion, exactly how many black babies need to be murdered for every white baby murdered for it to be justified?

Really ask yourself that. **How many black babies need to be murdered for the murder of a white baby to be justified?**

Because that is your logic. Correct me of Im wrong, but is that not your position? That the satantic ritual murders of innocent babies are justified because "blacks get them more". So, elaborate and tell me the exact ratio for it to be justified.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> Children do not hold political positions. Even if they did, we wouldn't kill them for it.

In most cases children become like their parents. That is genetically intended. If I have children, you can be quite sure they will be similar to me, as my wife would be as well. I would want them to adopt my positive traits and not have my negative ones, but ultimately it's most likely they'll inherit (genetically and socially) both.

So the political positions of my children will be some kind of right wing, ranging from Libertarian to NatSoc. If you were a staunch leftist, you wouldn't want me to reproduce, because it would increase the number of your opponents.

And I expect blue haired feminist freaks to mold their children into ideological extensions of themselves. The idea of every child being a "tabula rasa" is wishful thinking, just as "equality" is.

> Tell me, in your opinion, exactly how many black babies need to be murdered for every white baby murdered for it to be justified?

It's a weird question. Those who abort their babies aren't people I'd want to reproduce anyway. So I don't see a big problem there. If I'd be able to reduce the reproduction of niggers in exchange for reducing the reproduction of leftist Whites, I'd gladly accept.

If it's about conservatives, moderates, Christians or other sane Whites, I'd see it as a sacrifice or a bad outcome. I wouldn't want them to have abortions, but I'd accept that there is a utilitarian purpose (in this scenario). For them the number would be at least ~100.

If each leftist abortion causes ~10 abortions of blacks, I'd consider it ideal. The more, the better, the less, the worse, but the number can go either way. I wouldn't want to go lower than ~4 though.
LawrysSeasonedSoap on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Okay so you value an innocent white baby at about 4x that of a black baby. And if I convince you that babies do not in fact inherit the political worldviews of their parents as paradigms are not genetic, you would value an innocent white baby at 100x that of a black baby.

If you had a magic button that killed 100 random niggers but also killed 1 random white person, would you press it?

I don't think we are gonna find common ground here. This is the most morally corrupted take on abortion by a mile. Putting figures to it shows how evil this mindset is. You couldve said 1000 or 1 million and it still would've meant that you want systematic ritualistic legal infanticide in your country because white babies being murdered is worth more black babies being murdered. But you said 100, so shameful. Im shocked by how heartless you are.

My position is clear. It is infanticide. It is a satanic ritual. It exists so jews can harvest goyim organs and cells to be turned into HEK "flavoring", vaccines, cosmetics, homunculus experiments and bioprocessors. It should not be tolerated in our countries. No exceptions.

I dont want other culturea doing it either. Would you say "cannibalism is good because blacks do it more than whites"?
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
> so you value an innocent

"Guilt" is completely irrelevant. It's the offspring of political enemies or other races which are in opposition to me. It's a very simple thought process. If there are hundreds of rats in my house, I don't wait to see which one is "guilty" of nabbing food, destroying things or threatening me. ALL rats must be removed indiscriminately, and I don't require them to be evil. They are rats - they do what rats do. And I do what I must do.

> you would value an innocent white baby at 100x that of a black baby.

One is about removing ideological opponents, the other is a sacrifice. Niggers are worse than worthless, they are actively harmful to us. If I had the trolley problem where 1 singular White person would be on one track, and ALL niggers in the world on the other, you know what I'd switch the track to, and it would be an easy choice. That is why I said your question is a little weird, because the answer is likely to be misinterpreted.

I do think that leftists are redeemable - they can change their minds and stop being liberals and degenerates, grooming their children into faggotry and the idea of equality, and instead raise their children in a good manner.

> I don't think we are gonna find common ground here.

Well, we have different views. More people share your views than mine. You disagree, but at least you have insight into a different view.

> You couldve said 1000 or 1 million

That would be hollow virtue signalling, and I didn't want to insult you with that. I genuinely thought about it, but remember that it's a hypothetical scenario. If possible, I'd outlaw abortion for Whites and only allow it for non-Whites. Then see how jews are seething over it, and start a crusade to force abortion to Whites. And watch how people notice that all of these advocates aren't just Whites, but actually jews.

> Would you say "cannibalism is good because blacks do it more than whites"?

Cannibalism doesn't do anything positive. It's about eating corpses, so there is no reason to tolerate it. There is no sacrifice in play, no advantage - so no value for a hypothetical scenario.
Toast message