I made a new account (weimersolutions / heagleart) and realized just how curated my old feed was because I must have blocked more than half of you guys. And seeing conpro in it's raw state, I noticed that tge specific users that I blocked myself from seeing are still here and just as active or more than the "real conpro" as I used to view it.
Here's the thing, these users' posts seem to get traction when it is something that aligns with our values, but will then mix it with things that definitely do not such as abortion, the complete destruction of women's sovereignty, or genocidal suggestions. I call this "conflation propaganda" as it tries to conflate certain defamatory values with our reasonable values through malicious actor among us.
Also I dont think the main target is the new users to scare them off, while that may be part of it, I think that we are the main targets of this propaganda. A user makes some reposts from a few months prior, and then he's "in" and ready to begin directly twisting our values. Often it is a pagan trying to delegitimize the moral superiority of Christianity or a mgtow meninist blaming white women (specifically white) while disregarding their jewish brainwashing. I think it's an attempt to lure our younger members off the conpro path (of learning the jq and embracing independence over consumerism) with an edgy, "hot take" that more aligns with the kike paradigm.
- Abortion should be illegal and considered murder.
- People who willingly participate in abortion (whether it be the mother or "doctor") should be considered murderers and be sentenced as such.
- In order to enforce this, it requires taking away the "choice" of the mother (or whoever wants to abort the pregnancy) by telling her "no, it is not OK to murder an unborn child".
The cynical part of me thinks that people (politicians) on the right have no intention of actually prohibiting abortion because (at least in the state I live in) the "pro life" coalitions shoot down meaningful pro-life legislation in favor of laws and amendments that do nothing to curtail abortion because of the amount of "exceptions" they put in it.
I think politicians on the right have a vested interest in *not* fixing the abortion issue because if they did, it would mean they have to find some other watershed issue to campaign on.
Sorry for my last comment. You have some good points.