Jesus appeared to all of his disciples at various times.
One of his disciples, Thomas, happened to be absent and didn't witness Jesus' resurrection for himself. He said he could not believe unless he saw it himself.
Jesus appeared to Thomas and showed him his body resurrected. He also said it is better to believe without a witness than to receive a witness.
Sometimes we think too hard about things, and we forget that Jesus simply wants us to exercise our faith in him. Just trust that he knows what he is doing, confess and forsake your sins, and let him bear the burden. Then live your life as if you knew for a fact that Jesus was real and had visited you just like he visited the ancient apostles. Read about what he did and emulate him in every way you can. Teach others to do the same.
That is what I think about the Shroud.
One of his disciples, Thomas, happened to be absent and didn't witness Jesus' resurrection for himself. He said he could not believe unless he saw it himself.
Jesus appeared to Thomas and showed him his body resurrected. He also said it is better to believe without a witness than to receive a witness.
Sometimes we think too hard about things, and we forget that Jesus simply wants us to exercise our faith in him. Just trust that he knows what he is doing, confess and forsake your sins, and let him bear the burden. Then live your life as if you knew for a fact that Jesus was real and had visited you just like he visited the ancient apostles. Read about what he did and emulate him in every way you can. Teach others to do the same.
That is what I think about the Shroud.
https://files.catbox.moe/db66ak.png
The only conceivable way to disprove the authenticity of the shroud now, would be to somehow prove that all of the people that worked on it (proving it to be genuine) were all lying. Given how ridiculously anti-Christian "science" has become, and the general trend of honesty and integrity of Christian scientists (even layman in the field), it's almost conclusively the other way around. Meaning, it's most likely the mainstream academics claiming the shroud to be fraudulent are lying, and refuse to address any contrary evidence, intentionally ignoring it hoping the people forget about it, and with their control over the narrative and textbooks, are hoping to memory hole the contrary evidence. It's a censorious process I've seen occur repeatedly across every academic field, for at least the last 200 years (at least from the stuff I've heard of thus far).
Many such cases, lol.
>would be to somehow prove that all of the people that worked on it (proving it to be genuine) were all lying
Jews are on the case, don't worry
>intentionally ignoring it hoping the people forget about it, and with their control over the narrative and textbooks, are hoping to memory hole the contrary evidence
Hmm, where have I heard this one before...