New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I'd recently come across an image of Jesus, which was rendered by AI (Midjourney) according to the imprint on the shroud of Turin, which supposedly covered Jesus after he was crucified. Here's a link about the info, which also contains the AI image:


https://angelusnews.com/arts-culture/ai-jesus-shroud-turin/


In any case, I was wondering what y'all's thoughts were on it, and if anyone had any info on the authenticity of the shroud of Turin.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
ApexVeritas on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Good read. Thanks for the link. I miss old 4chan before all the shills largely took over.
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
You got it. Been awhile since I read it, I should probably go back and read through it again.
ApexVeritas on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
It was pretty darn convincing. I don't see how anyone could claim the shroud was "debunked" after reading all of that, and I don't see how any future proofs could rebuke what was proven about the shroud. I asked for proofs of it being debunked lower in the post, but didn't get any response.


The only conceivable way to disprove the authenticity of the shroud now, would be to somehow prove that all of the people that worked on it (proving it to be genuine) were all lying. Given how ridiculously anti-Christian "science" has become, and the general trend of honesty and integrity of Christian scientists (even layman in the field), it's almost conclusively the other way around. Meaning, it's most likely the mainstream academics claiming the shroud to be fraudulent are lying, and refuse to address any contrary evidence, intentionally ignoring it hoping the people forget about it, and with their control over the narrative and textbooks, are hoping to memory hole the contrary evidence. It's a censorious process I've seen occur repeatedly across every academic field, for at least the last 200 years (at least from the stuff I've heard of thus far).
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
> I asked for proofs of it being debunked lower in the post, but didn't get any response.

Many such cases, lol.

>would be to somehow prove that all of the people that worked on it (proving it to be genuine) were all lying

Jews are on the case, don't worry

>intentionally ignoring it hoping the people forget about it, and with their control over the narrative and textbooks, are hoping to memory hole the contrary evidence

Hmm, where have I heard this one before...
Toast message