Its a compliment
(media.scored.co)
Become what your enemy fears.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
48 comments:
In mein Kampf, Hitler states that the jewish press used the same stratgies against the Nazis and accused them of being Monarchists, ironically, though Hitler himself said he really didnt care what form his government took so long as it put the interests of the Nation first.
Any stable system of government is a threat to the Jewish playbook. They is why they actively work to turn monarchies into republics, republics into democracies, democracies into social democracies, social democracies into marxist governments, marxist governments into communist, communist into full on anarchy where everyday freedoms require permission from jews.
No, Not "communism". That is a misdirection.
Their 1850s UK regime was hardly "communist". Neither was *based* Pinochet.
Having a government and stable government are very important steps. This has been neglected, allowed the jews to establish their own stable regime.
Their 1850s UK regime was hardly "communist". Neither was *based* Pinochet.
Having a government and stable government are very important steps. This has been neglected, allowed the jews to establish their own stable regime.
I agree with Hitler on this.
It's pointless to argue about how the deck chairs should be arranged if the ship is sinking.
Government exists for ONE purpose and ONLY ONE purpose.
It's pointless to argue about how the deck chairs should be arranged if the ship is sinking.
Government exists for ONE purpose and ONLY ONE purpose.
Lightbulb moment: Us NatSocs should just make some referential Monarchism based name and use that, with it being an in-joke about this, but still being NatSoc.
Yes, indubitably sir, we are nationalist monarchists (or w/e someone that's better at it come up with something), we denounce NAHTZEEISM fully!
Really just joking though because I actually think the level of sperglord fear that NatSoc invokes in the average faggot is a boon rather than a hindrance.
Yes, indubitably sir, we are nationalist monarchists (or w/e someone that's better at it come up with something), we denounce NAHTZEEISM fully!
Really just joking though because I actually think the level of sperglord fear that NatSoc invokes in the average faggot is a boon rather than a hindrance.
I actually am a monarchist, simply because Monarchy is inherently nationalist. (unless its the rootless jewed kind the windsors and hapsburgs practice, but theyre glorified jesters anyway)/
Which monarch doesn't kiss the Jewish hand?
Issue is Monarchism is built on tradition, NS is more of a futurist ideation, thusly it works better in this day and age.
Yeah I agree, it's not very practical.
To be fair, a tradition will need to be established, one of the reasons NS crumpled so fast after the allied victory was because it had no tradition to fall back on to ensure it would survive occupation.
This is unironically one of the strongest forces that propelled me to Christianity.
It's hard to prove that God exists, but it's abundantly clear that demons exist. And boy do they hate Jesus Christ.
It's hard to prove that God exists, but it's abundantly clear that demons exist. And boy do they hate Jesus Christ.
I am a reformed atheist who has come to recognize the utility of following the teachings of Christ. Feels good, man.
/religion is essentially cliffsNotes philosophy for the masses.
//Also, an expression of instinctual drives that have promoted survival.
/religion is essentially cliffsNotes philosophy for the masses.
//Also, an expression of instinctual drives that have promoted survival.
This thought process eventually lead me here a couple of years ago
I remember as a kid thinking it sounded implausible that they'd ship around a bunch of people and gas them instead of just shooting them. I didn't get actually jewpilled until 9/11 though.
But it was like "Why bother shipping all these fuckers around, just shoot them and throw em into the ditch, that's what a bunch of other regimes did in the past. Sounds fucking fake."
But it was like "Why bother shipping all these fuckers around, just shoot them and throw em into the ditch, that's what a bunch of other regimes did in the past. Sounds fucking fake."
I remember asking why any country would invade another country where they were not wanted. It was just stupid, because the people would obviously not accept the conquerors in modern times.
Then I heard that Austria actually voted to join with Germany. And what happened in France after Germany "invaded".
History makes a lot more sense if you assume your enemy weren't just retarded but, you know, actually read stuff.
Then I heard that Austria actually voted to join with Germany. And what happened in France after Germany "invaded".
History makes a lot more sense if you assume your enemy weren't just retarded but, you know, actually read stuff.
Woukd to be willing to provide any resources about those specific instances? I'm fully convinced Hitlers regime was doing the right thing, but I haven't as much time for research.
That point is so obvious to the point that it beggars belief why it isn't general knowledge.
I was thinking about something like this a few months ago. You have yiddish socialists and communists (e.g. Marx, Bernstein, Kautsky), yiddish libertarians (e.g. Friedman, Mises, Ayn Rand, Rothbard, Yaron Brook), yiddish social democrats (e.g. Ed Miliband, Bernie Sanders), yiddish conservatives (e.g. Mark Levin), yiddish feminists (e.g. Sontag, Firestone [Feuerstein], Friedan [Goldstein]), yiddish Greens/environmentalists (e.g. Peter Singer, Jill Stein), and even yiddish Christians (e.g. Bob Siegel). Looking at lists of key figures in so many groups, from Marxism to psychoanalysis to contemporary mass media to the Secretaries of the Treasury, is like looking at a yiddish family tree: one notices quickly that... they're all yids, and that of the few that aren't, that they have yiddish spouses.
Notice thus that one can find yids *all* over the political spectrum: *except* on the Far-Right or 'Auth-Right', where one only finds a few oddball yids. The likes of Itamar Ben Gvir are the closest there is to it, but this type of yid is only religiously motivated and would actively oppose non-yiddish Far-Rightists. The political Far-Right is practically yid-free insofar as its authentic adherents are concerned, although inauthentic subversives exist, like whoever that BAP character is.
It's such an easy way to determine which part of the political spectrum is the part that isn't completely 'fake and gay'. It would be part of the education system in any sane country: look at where the yids are, and look at who opposes us. This is your proof that we—we, who are now the State—are indubitably right, and this is why none of these people must ever be given freedom or equality or rights ever again; why none of them must ever exercise authority, influence or power ever again; and why no action that the State takes to eradicate them is excessive or unjustified.
They had better hope that they win, for all of their nightmares will come true if they do not.
I was thinking about something like this a few months ago. You have yiddish socialists and communists (e.g. Marx, Bernstein, Kautsky), yiddish libertarians (e.g. Friedman, Mises, Ayn Rand, Rothbard, Yaron Brook), yiddish social democrats (e.g. Ed Miliband, Bernie Sanders), yiddish conservatives (e.g. Mark Levin), yiddish feminists (e.g. Sontag, Firestone [Feuerstein], Friedan [Goldstein]), yiddish Greens/environmentalists (e.g. Peter Singer, Jill Stein), and even yiddish Christians (e.g. Bob Siegel). Looking at lists of key figures in so many groups, from Marxism to psychoanalysis to contemporary mass media to the Secretaries of the Treasury, is like looking at a yiddish family tree: one notices quickly that... they're all yids, and that of the few that aren't, that they have yiddish spouses.
Notice thus that one can find yids *all* over the political spectrum: *except* on the Far-Right or 'Auth-Right', where one only finds a few oddball yids. The likes of Itamar Ben Gvir are the closest there is to it, but this type of yid is only religiously motivated and would actively oppose non-yiddish Far-Rightists. The political Far-Right is practically yid-free insofar as its authentic adherents are concerned, although inauthentic subversives exist, like whoever that BAP character is.
It's such an easy way to determine which part of the political spectrum is the part that isn't completely 'fake and gay'. It would be part of the education system in any sane country: look at where the yids are, and look at who opposes us. This is your proof that we—we, who are now the State—are indubitably right, and this is why none of these people must ever be given freedom or equality or rights ever again; why none of them must ever exercise authority, influence or power ever again; and why no action that the State takes to eradicate them is excessive or unjustified.
They had better hope that they win, for all of their nightmares will come true if they do not.
No one can even say what "conservatism" is anymore, because it is indistinguishable from Marxism.
The people who actually object to Marxism are considered ultra-right ethno-nationalist nazis!
The people who actually object to Marxism are considered ultra-right ethno-nationalist nazis!
>That they were authoritarian
considering all the "nazis were muh authoritarian" propaganda comes from when they were literally at war and *had* to curtail certain freedoms (while the allied nations were equally tyrannical at the time, but had the gall to claim they were fighting for liberty and democracy as they forced young men to die in a war they had no business being in to begin with), I'm not sure a peace time post-war nazi germany would be all that authoritarian.
considering all the "nazis were muh authoritarian" propaganda comes from when they were literally at war and *had* to curtail certain freedoms (while the allied nations were equally tyrannical at the time, but had the gall to claim they were fighting for liberty and democracy as they forced young men to die in a war they had no business being in to begin with), I'm not sure a peace time post-war nazi germany would be all that authoritarian.
Toast message
Prefer their beliefs, thought. By a lot.