New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
141
Its a compliment (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by WhitemaleHH on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +141Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
12
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 4 children
In mein Kampf, Hitler states that the jewish press used the same stratgies against the Nazis and accused them of being Monarchists, ironically, though Hitler himself said he really didnt care what form his government took so long as it put the interests of the Nation first.
Feelsgood2020 on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Any stable system of government is a threat to the Jewish playbook. They is why they actively work to turn monarchies into republics, republics into democracies, democracies into social democracies, social democracies into marxist governments, marxist governments into communist, communist into full on anarchy where everyday freedoms require permission from jews.
January22nd2022 on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
No, Not "communism". That is a misdirection.

Their 1850s UK regime was hardly "communist". Neither was *based* Pinochet.
 
Having a government and stable government are very important steps. This has been neglected, allowed the jews to establish their own stable regime.
Thenoticingcontinues on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
What's in your opinion better suited than communism in the above comment?
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
yudsfpbc on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
I agree with Hitler on this.

It's pointless to argue about how the deck chairs should be arranged if the ship is sinking.

Government exists for ONE purpose and ONLY ONE purpose.
Thenoticingcontinues on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
What's that?
americathegr888 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
Lightbulb moment: Us NatSocs should just make some referential Monarchism based name and use that, with it being an in-joke about this, but still being NatSoc.

Yes, indubitably sir, we are nationalist monarchists (or w/e someone that's better at it come up with something), we denounce NAHTZEEISM fully!

Really just joking though because I actually think the level of sperglord fear that NatSoc invokes in the average faggot is a boon rather than a hindrance.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
I actually am a monarchist, simply because Monarchy is inherently nationalist. (unless its the rootless jewed kind the windsors and hapsburgs practice, but theyre glorified jesters anyway)/
deleteme1234 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Which monarch doesn't kiss the Jewish hand?
Feelsgood2020 on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
They murdered the ones who didn’t.

Tsar Nicholas, Muammar Gaddafi. Anyone who tried to keep gold backed monetary systems in place.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
This, the reason the current monarchs we have are crap is because they are collaborators who not only sold their own nations to the jews, they also helped the jews destroy the ones who refused to collaborate.
americathegr888 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I remember one of those like political axis tests was going around the old Plebbit 200acres subplebbit at one point (everyone there were NatSoc types) and my result was monarchist leaning.

WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
Issue is Monarchism is built on tradition, NS is more of a futurist ideation, thusly it works better in this day and age.
americathegr888 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yeah I agree, it's not very practical.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
If it was to come, it'd come from NS or some other 3rd position/authoritarian ideal
americathegr888 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I also agree with that. The only type of government organization that can claw back from <whatever> and form something new is one that is willing to wield the power of the state over its enemies.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
To be fair, a tradition will need to be established, one of the reasons NS crumpled so fast after the allied victory was because it had no tradition to fall back on to ensure it would survive occupation.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Probably would have created one in victory, 12 years with a war and having to fix a ton of issues just isn't enough time, they had plenty of grand ideals.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Yes, and the Nazis were sadly all over the place with what prior traditions they wanted to include into their own ideology.
January22nd2022 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
"The natzees are monarcheests!"

"They are clueless reactionaries!"

"They are also sosleests!"

"Marxist COMMUNEESTS even!"
Toast message