You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
12
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)4 children
In mein Kampf, Hitler states that the jewish press used the same stratgies against the Nazis and accused them of being Monarchists, ironically, though Hitler himself said he really didnt care what form his government took so long as it put the interests of the Nation first.
1 year ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
Any stable system of government is a threat to the Jewish playbook. They is why they actively work to turn monarchies into republics, republics into democracies, democracies into social democracies, social democracies into marxist governments, marxist governments into communist, communist into full on anarchy where everyday freedoms require permission from jews.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
Lightbulb moment: Us NatSocs should just make some referential Monarchism based name and use that, with it being an in-joke about this, but still being NatSoc.
Yes, indubitably sir, we are nationalist monarchists (or w/e someone that's better at it come up with something), we denounce NAHTZEEISM fully!
Really just joking though because I actually think the level of sperglord fear that NatSoc invokes in the average faggot is a boon rather than a hindrance.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
I actually am a monarchist, simply because Monarchy is inherently nationalist. (unless its the rootless jewed kind the windsors and hapsburgs practice, but theyre glorified jesters anyway)/
This, the reason the current monarchs we have are crap is because they are collaborators who not only sold their own nations to the jews, they also helped the jews destroy the ones who refused to collaborate.
I remember one of those like political axis tests was going around the old Plebbit 200acres subplebbit at one point (everyone there were NatSoc types) and my result was monarchist leaning.
I also agree with that. The only type of government organization that can claw back from <whatever> and form something new is one that is willing to wield the power of the state over its enemies.
To be fair, a tradition will need to be established, one of the reasons NS crumpled so fast after the allied victory was because it had no tradition to fall back on to ensure it would survive occupation.
Probably would have created one in victory, 12 years with a war and having to fix a ton of issues just isn't enough time, they had plenty of grand ideals.
Their 1850s UK regime was hardly "communist". Neither was *based* Pinochet.
Having a government and stable government are very important steps. This has been neglected, allowed the jews to establish their own stable regime.
It's pointless to argue about how the deck chairs should be arranged if the ship is sinking.
Government exists for ONE purpose and ONLY ONE purpose.
Yes, indubitably sir, we are nationalist monarchists (or w/e someone that's better at it come up with something), we denounce NAHTZEEISM fully!
Really just joking though because I actually think the level of sperglord fear that NatSoc invokes in the average faggot is a boon rather than a hindrance.
Tsar Nicholas, Muammar Gaddafi. Anyone who tried to keep gold backed monetary systems in place.
"They are clueless reactionaries!"
"They are also sosleests!"
"Marxist COMMUNEESTS even!"