sparrow
Joined 3 years ago
Comment points: 263 Post points: 1287

3 years ago 1 point (+1 / -0 )
it is sad they are so anti-white and biased and have such an agenda
None
3 years ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
hmmm I just stumbled upon something like this recently
 
https://infogalactic.com/info/Holy_See%E2%80%93Israel_relations
 
> [Pius XII] is noted for his rejection of any plan for the establishment of a State of Israel in the British Palestine territory, on religious and theological grounds.
 
didn't watch video, but I believe the consistent Catholic view was that Israel was not to be established, because the current Jews have rejected Christ and are in error, and perhaps the Holy Land was right for Christians to possess?
 
Then the Vatican seems to have been taken over, which again is why some of us are sedevacantist. As they now speak the opposite views of the Catholic views before. The current "popes" (who some of us do not believe to be Catholic popes) are basically silent on a lot of these issues, and in practice support the opposite teachings. This prevents them from being considered openly against Catholic teaching and rejected as non-Catholic, but their actions still seem to signify their opposition to Catholicism and seem to suggest they are neither Catholic nor popes.
 
So, I think Catholicism is opposed to Zionism. But then the current "Catholicism" is fake and taken over and anti-Catholic now. So that's where I think things stand.
None
3 years ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
ok i skimmed it
 
some of us are more focused on the problems of vatican 2 (and have taken the position of sedevacantism in response) than these questions
 
problem is some of these objections can be used against christianity in general so not always specific to catholicism
 
also the obelisk for example was supposed to be intentionally taking a pagan symbol and "christianizing" it as a symbolic triumph of christianity over paganism
 
this has been done enough times that it seems to be a standard practice
 
however there have been some shenanigans going in the opposite direction like the last resurrection sculpture in st peter's basilica or one of the churches looking like a snake (some popular images that have circulated).
 
these do to me seem more like non-catholics have taken over the institution of catholicism and are now mocking it. (hence the sedevacantist stance being taken)
None
https://humanurehandbook.com/
 
So while the discussions.app site is getting trolled with some "human manure" (humanure) posts, I thought I would mention that I think composting human manure is kind of an interesting and important topic.
 
It's kind of like manure from any other animal, full of nutrients. Figuring out how to compost it can close the loop and reduce dependence on a waste water treatment facility.
 
I think it just composts like other things, but you need to let it compost a lot longer to make sure harmful things are destroyed. And might want to spread it on something that's not a food source. Although anecdotally I've heard of people getting treated sewage fertilizer and it growing tall crops.
 
Relatedly I know there was something called "night soil": https://infogalactic.com/info/Night_soil
 
"Night soil is a euphemism for human feces collected at night from cesspools, privies, etc. and sometimes used as a fertilizer."
 
Humanure when dried can also be used as fuel I think.
 
idk how all this works entirely, just opening up for discussion since we had that "manure" theme on the forum
 
Any thoughts on how to compost or make use of human manure?
"Rogation Days" In Catholic Encyclopedia: https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13110b.htm
 
> Days of prayer, and formerly also of fasting, instituted by the Church to appease God's anger at man's transgressions, to ask protection in calamities, and to obtain a good and bountiful harvest
3 years ago 4 points (+4 / -0 )
sure
 
people could just post more
None
3 years ago 1 point (+1 / -0 ) 1 child
> why don't we see these everywhere
 
must not be cost effective or something
 
I mean it's possible it is still cost effective and unpopular but if it was so useful even the big corporations would use them, wouldn't they?
 
I am curious to hear if you experiment with this further
None
3 years ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
lul hope you had some pizza if you wanted to partake...
None
posted 3 years ago by sparrow in general (+2 / -0 )
3 years ago 2 points (+2 / -0 ) 1 child
I've just seen that they exist: https://www.enginediy.com/collections/stirling-engine
 
alt power source?
 
https://infogalactic.com/info/Stirling_engine
None
3 years ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
i would alter it to right image on left, city on top, middle image on right? (right image being something simple?)
None
3 years ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
an ebike could be a "cheat" if you need a little extra power if your commute is really long but it still might be time consooming
None
3 years ago 1 point (+1 / -0 )
ve vill eet de boggs!
None
3 years ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
summer of frens
None
3 years ago 1 point (+1 / -0 ) 2 children
did you hear of the buffalo shooting?
 
 
...
None
So I've identified this is an issue off and on, my strategy for reducing the problem is to record things to search on a search engine to do at a later time if ever (instead of searching for it, opening up tabs, and then leaving them be accumulated). Or to bookmark open tabs and come back to them.
 
Anyone else run in to this problem and how do you manage it?
 
> tfw just cleared out a tab hoard
 
I wrote down the main ideas I search for, and discarded accumluated extra unneeded links
A Catholic Marriage Manual from 1958 states (p. 116):
 
(It's this book but you'd need an account to borrow it to check it: https://archive.org/details/catholicmarriage00kell)
 
> "Danger of the working wife [Section Title] ... In 1890, only 4% of married women in the United States were gainfully employed. By 1940, that number had increased to fifteen percent, and by 1956 thirty per cent of all married women held jobs outside the home. ... The wife should work outside the home only in cases of great necessity. Experience teaches that the path of the working wife is strewn with difficulties, both for herself and her family. ... In other cases, if the wife's income approximates or exceeds that of her hsuband [sic], his pride may be deeply wounded, and friction may easily develop over the question of who is head of the household. Work outside the home may also foster traits undesirable in a wife. She may become economically independent, and be less willing to make sacrifices and emotional adjustments to keep relations with her husband on a happy basis."
 
And so on. You get the gist. I am not aware of this teaching being formally rejected in any way and so many "Catholics" would be in violation of it today (?).
 
It also seems to imply the "house husband" arrangement is unthinkable, or a choice for a minority (?).
 
To me the rise of female breadwinners, and house husbands, stems from a rejection of Christian teaching and social norms.
 
Yes, no? What is to be thought of "house husbands" today?
DIY Soap Shoes (www.instructables.com)
posted 3 years ago by sparrow in general (+2 / -0 )
seems like an interesting monitor replacement idea
Kentucky Derby General (www.kentuckyderby.com)
posted 3 years ago by sparrow in general (+2 / -0 )
Today is Free Comic Book Day (www.freecomicbookday.com)
posted 3 years ago by sparrow in ConsumeProduct (+1 / -1 )
Consoom comics?
Toast message