You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
Prof_Chaos on scored.co
11 hours ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
> Tucker Carlson: *"Israel attacked us. Okay, so what does that mean? Maybe we deserved it. Maybe it was necessary to force our perspective about the world that we actually occupy. I know, it sounds like an absurd, preposterous thing to propose. But consider the history between the Western word and the jewish diaspora. Have you though to see the world from the eyes of a jew, and why haven't you? I could go on, but I know that most don't want to consider our own guilt in all this, but I digress."*
7 hours ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
When did he say that? If it was years ago, it was before he changed.
Not that is reliable, but he had an interview with a doctor in Palestine, who figured out that on different days his patients had injuries from being shot on different parts on their bodies. Meaning the IDF kikes are playing games where they shoot other parts of the bodies of civilians (especially children) on a timely basis (daily, weekly, etc).
7 hours ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> Medical personnel working in Gaza and international observers have reported witnessing systematic patterns of specific gunshot wounds among civilian casualties, describing the injuries as resembling target practice or a game.
7 hours ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Tucker Carlson brings attention to things like this, and he interviews people who have things to say about jews and israel too. This is quite positive. It can be considered something like a redemption arc, and he is no staunch defender of jews (any more).
As such he is on a similar level as Nick Fuentes, or even beyond. Fuentes just sits there and rambles about israel and Vance, and then explains how "infiltrating the government with based gen Z" is a great plan, or how "voting for the other party" is revolutionary (even though that's a core mechanism of Democracy, aka playing into the system like idiots). Or he is busy shittalking about all sorts of right-wingers or running defence for jews.
The Charlie Kirk situation, in which he did he best to combat the idea that israelis killed Charlie Kirk because he started to turn on them, even though he was their golden boy zionist (a staunch zionist turning anti-jew is a nightmare scenario for them, so they *had* to kill him ASAP - also it was treason to all the jewish donors who did so much to him).
I am not sure he ever brought up Levon Affair, USS Liberty, 9/11, JFK or other things jews did. If he ignored any of those, he is effectively running defence for them. Or that they control and run all of US media, 7 out of 9 social media platforms, have JIDF-type propaganda machines.
If anything, he may discard some of these topics as "low-IQ anti-semitism", which is akin to a psyop to gatekeep away such topics, because **he** places himself as the ultimate authority on anti-semitism, and if he doesn't approve of something, it must be "low-IQ antisemitism" - which also proves him extremely arrogant. Which is why I do not admit that he is "smart." Eloquent, sure, but not particularly smart. And either a subversive traitor (unlikely) or just captured by his own, unmerited arrogance.
Not that is reliable, but he had an interview with a doctor in Palestine, who figured out that on different days his patients had injuries from being shot on different parts on their bodies. Meaning the IDF kikes are playing games where they shoot other parts of the bodies of civilians (especially children) on a timely basis (daily, weekly, etc).
Disgusting.
As such he is on a similar level as Nick Fuentes, or even beyond. Fuentes just sits there and rambles about israel and Vance, and then explains how "infiltrating the government with based gen Z" is a great plan, or how "voting for the other party" is revolutionary (even though that's a core mechanism of Democracy, aka playing into the system like idiots). Or he is busy shittalking about all sorts of right-wingers or running defence for jews.
Quit being a clown. Tucker is a confirmed CIA-adjacent plant and rejects White greatness.
I am not sure he ever brought up Levon Affair, USS Liberty, 9/11, JFK or other things jews did. If he ignored any of those, he is effectively running defence for them. Or that they control and run all of US media, 7 out of 9 social media platforms, have JIDF-type propaganda machines.
If anything, he may discard some of these topics as "low-IQ anti-semitism", which is akin to a psyop to gatekeep away such topics, because **he** places himself as the ultimate authority on anti-semitism, and if he doesn't approve of something, it must be "low-IQ antisemitism" - which also proves him extremely arrogant. Which is why I do not admit that he is "smart." Eloquent, sure, but not particularly smart. And either a subversive traitor (unlikely) or just captured by his own, unmerited arrogance.