The Charlie Kirk situation, in which he did he best to combat the idea that israelis killed Charlie Kirk because he started to turn on them, even though he was their golden boy zionist (a staunch zionist turning anti-jew is a nightmare scenario for them, so they *had* to kill him ASAP - also it was treason to all the jewish donors who did so much to him).
I am not sure he ever brought up Levon Affair, USS Liberty, 9/11, JFK or other things jews did. If he ignored any of those, he is effectively running defence for them. Or that they control and run all of US media, 7 out of 9 social media platforms, have JIDF-type propaganda machines.
If anything, he may discard some of these topics as "low-IQ anti-semitism", which is akin to a psyop to gatekeep away such topics, because **he** places himself as the ultimate authority on anti-semitism, and if he doesn't approve of something, it must be "low-IQ antisemitism" - which also proves him extremely arrogant. Which is why I do not admit that he is "smart." Eloquent, sure, but not particularly smart. And either a subversive traitor (unlikely) or just captured by his own, unmerited arrogance.
Quit being a clown. Tucker is a confirmed CIA-adjacent plant and rejects White greatness.
I am not sure he ever brought up Levon Affair, USS Liberty, 9/11, JFK or other things jews did. If he ignored any of those, he is effectively running defence for them. Or that they control and run all of US media, 7 out of 9 social media platforms, have JIDF-type propaganda machines.
If anything, he may discard some of these topics as "low-IQ anti-semitism", which is akin to a psyop to gatekeep away such topics, because **he** places himself as the ultimate authority on anti-semitism, and if he doesn't approve of something, it must be "low-IQ antisemitism" - which also proves him extremely arrogant. Which is why I do not admit that he is "smart." Eloquent, sure, but not particularly smart. And either a subversive traitor (unlikely) or just captured by his own, unmerited arrogance.