Any doubt?
(media.scored.co)
They already did and our politicians still do. It’s called 9/11
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
17 comments:
18
10 hours ago
18 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+18Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
I mean they already planned to kill our civilians in the Lavon Affair along with the UK's so that they could get us to kill their enemies.
They already attacked a US naval ship for a prolonged period of time after it being obvious it was a US ship, which means they did it on purpose.
A bunch of jews set off a bomb in the Whitehouse
Clinton pardoned this yenta.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rosenberg
Oh and if that wasn't enough they ran a child sex ring through Robert Maxwell's daughter. He was given a state funeral in Israel attended by all the heads of state.
So yeah the blackmailed, pedophile, freemason, third temple building politicians would claim we are being punished by God for not supporting Israel.
They already attacked a US naval ship for a prolonged period of time after it being obvious it was a US ship, which means they did it on purpose.
A bunch of jews set off a bomb in the Whitehouse
Clinton pardoned this yenta.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rosenberg
Oh and if that wasn't enough they ran a child sex ring through Robert Maxwell's daughter. He was given a state funeral in Israel attended by all the heads of state.
So yeah the blackmailed, pedophile, freemason, third temple building politicians would claim we are being punished by God for not supporting Israel.
Israel did bomb America multiple times already and our politicians support Israel when you point it out, so this is already true because it's old as fuck.
> Tucker Carlson: *"Israel attacked us. Okay, so what does that mean? Maybe we deserved it. Maybe it was necessary to force our perspective about the world that we actually occupy. I know, it sounds like an absurd, preposterous thing to propose. But consider the history between the Western word and the jewish diaspora. Have you though to see the world from the eyes of a jew, and why haven't you? I could go on, but I know that most don't want to consider our own guilt in all this, but I digress."*
When did he say that? If it was years ago, it was before he changed.
Not that is reliable, but he had an interview with a doctor in Palestine, who figured out that on different days his patients had injuries from being shot on different parts on their bodies. Meaning the IDF kikes are playing games where they shoot other parts of the bodies of civilians (especially children) on a timely basis (daily, weekly, etc).
Not that is reliable, but he had an interview with a doctor in Palestine, who figured out that on different days his patients had injuries from being shot on different parts on their bodies. Meaning the IDF kikes are playing games where they shoot other parts of the bodies of civilians (especially children) on a timely basis (daily, weekly, etc).
> Medical personnel working in Gaza and international observers have reported witnessing systematic patterns of specific gunshot wounds among civilian casualties, describing the injuries as resembling target practice or a game.
Disgusting.
Disgusting.
Tucker Carlson brings attention to things like this, and he interviews people who have things to say about jews and israel too. This is quite positive. It can be considered something like a redemption arc, and he is no staunch defender of jews (any more).
As such he is on a similar level as Nick Fuentes, or even beyond. Fuentes just sits there and rambles about israel and Vance, and then explains how "infiltrating the government with based gen Z" is a great plan, or how "voting for the other party" is revolutionary (even though that's a core mechanism of Democracy, aka playing into the system like idiots). Or he is busy shittalking about all sorts of right-wingers or running defence for jews.
As such he is on a similar level as Nick Fuentes, or even beyond. Fuentes just sits there and rambles about israel and Vance, and then explains how "infiltrating the government with based gen Z" is a great plan, or how "voting for the other party" is revolutionary (even though that's a core mechanism of Democracy, aka playing into the system like idiots). Or he is busy shittalking about all sorts of right-wingers or running defence for jews.
When has Nick "run defense for jews?"
Quit being a clown. Tucker is a confirmed CIA-adjacent plant and rejects White greatness.
Quit being a clown. Tucker is a confirmed CIA-adjacent plant and rejects White greatness.
The Charlie Kirk situation, in which he did he best to combat the idea that israelis killed Charlie Kirk because he started to turn on them, even though he was their golden boy zionist (a staunch zionist turning anti-jew is a nightmare scenario for them, so they *had* to kill him ASAP - also it was treason to all the jewish donors who did so much to him).
I am not sure he ever brought up Levon Affair, USS Liberty, 9/11, JFK or other things jews did. If he ignored any of those, he is effectively running defence for them. Or that they control and run all of US media, 7 out of 9 social media platforms, have JIDF-type propaganda machines.
If anything, he may discard some of these topics as "low-IQ anti-semitism", which is akin to a psyop to gatekeep away such topics, because **he** places himself as the ultimate authority on anti-semitism, and if he doesn't approve of something, it must be "low-IQ antisemitism" - which also proves him extremely arrogant. Which is why I do not admit that he is "smart." Eloquent, sure, but not particularly smart. And either a subversive traitor (unlikely) or just captured by his own, unmerited arrogance.
I am not sure he ever brought up Levon Affair, USS Liberty, 9/11, JFK or other things jews did. If he ignored any of those, he is effectively running defence for them. Or that they control and run all of US media, 7 out of 9 social media platforms, have JIDF-type propaganda machines.
If anything, he may discard some of these topics as "low-IQ anti-semitism", which is akin to a psyop to gatekeep away such topics, because **he** places himself as the ultimate authority on anti-semitism, and if he doesn't approve of something, it must be "low-IQ antisemitism" - which also proves him extremely arrogant. Which is why I do not admit that he is "smart." Eloquent, sure, but not particularly smart. And either a subversive traitor (unlikely) or just captured by his own, unmerited arrogance.
I wish, then we could finally solve this problem instead of suffering a slow bleed.
Toast message