New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
64
Any doubt? (media.scored.co)
posted 13 hours ago by PillarOfWisdom on scored.co (+1 / -0 / +63Score on mirror )
17 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
PurestEvil on scored.co
7 hours ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Tucker Carlson brings attention to things like this, and he interviews people who have things to say about jews and israel too. This is quite positive. It can be considered something like a redemption arc, and he is no staunch defender of jews (any more).

As such he is on a similar level as Nick Fuentes, or even beyond. Fuentes just sits there and rambles about israel and Vance, and then explains how "infiltrating the government with based gen Z" is a great plan, or how "voting for the other party" is revolutionary (even though that's a core mechanism of Democracy, aka playing into the system like idiots). Or he is busy shittalking about all sorts of right-wingers or running defence for jews.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Prof_Chaos on scored.co
7 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
When has Nick "run defense for jews?"

Quit being a clown. Tucker is a confirmed CIA-adjacent plant and rejects White greatness.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
PurestEvil on scored.co
7 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
The Charlie Kirk situation, in which he did he best to combat the idea that israelis killed Charlie Kirk because he started to turn on them, even though he was their golden boy zionist (a staunch zionist turning anti-jew is a nightmare scenario for them, so they *had* to kill him ASAP - also it was treason to all the jewish donors who did so much to him).

I am not sure he ever brought up Levon Affair, USS Liberty, 9/11, JFK or other things jews did. If he ignored any of those, he is effectively running defence for them. Or that they control and run all of US media, 7 out of 9 social media platforms, have JIDF-type propaganda machines.

If anything, he may discard some of these topics as "low-IQ anti-semitism", which is akin to a psyop to gatekeep away such topics, because **he** places himself as the ultimate authority on anti-semitism, and if he doesn't approve of something, it must be "low-IQ antisemitism" - which also proves him extremely arrogant. Which is why I do not admit that he is "smart." Eloquent, sure, but not particularly smart. And either a subversive traitor (unlikely) or just captured by his own, unmerited arrogance.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message