Consume Product

Perhaps. Who knows, considering how little is being studied with genuine curiosity. After the younger dryas impacts (roughly 12,000 years ago), the sea levels rose approximately 400 feet. Considering most people settle near water, most signs of civilization prior to that will be under water.

I've gotten most of my info from people like Uncharted X and the Brothers of the Serpent podcast. They talk with lots and lots of other people in this sphere, do book reviews, go visit these locations, take their own pictures and videos, and speculate on what it would take to make this stuff. The work that UnchartedX has done recently (the last year or two) on the precision granite vases has been particularly fascinating, and has actually led to a huge uptick in pricing for these artifacts on the antiquities market, because the mainstream archaeologists didn't know what they had, or ever bothered to measure them.

Who are you, juden peterstein?

I've always been fascinated with conspiracy theory related stuff (which I how I got red pilled on jews, banks, and WW2), so I consume a lot of content about this kind of stuff. Most people know about it, and considering how "out there" it is to the official/mainstream stuff, I understand the hesitance to give it any credence.


I've worked in rocks quarries. I've chiseled rock by hand, and used modern machinery, in the quarry and in saw shops, to work and shape stone, for thousands of hours. Looking at the polygonal stonework, specifically in Peru and Egypt, and the enormous stones on the bottom layers in many other locations, I have no idea how they did it.


It's not just me saying it, either. Other professionals, in stone working and in other fields, have no idea how it was done. Christopher Dunn, for example, asked rock quarries and professional stone workers how much it would cost, and the work involved, to create just single pieces of stones to mimic what we see in many of these ancient ruins. Either the work couldn't be done (the stone would have to be worked in several pieces, to be able to work it at all, and to transport it, given the massive size and weight of these stones, and then bolted together on site), or it would cost millions of dollars, for one single stone.


Look into the Egyptian drill cores. They were able to drill into rock with a hollow circular drill tube, which was 1/8" thick, at a work rate (how much the drill can cut into the material per revolution of the drill) over 500 times faster than our best drills we have today. Every single one of these drill cores has tool marks on it, showing how fast the drill could advance into the stone. The mainstream archaeologists lie about this, claiming the tool marks are parallel (not spiral), and even cant the pictures of the drill cores in textbooks slightly to "prove" they're parallel, even when laymen can go to museums and put string on these drill cores and wrap it around, proving the tool marks are spiral. The tool marks also weren't made by backing out the drill bit, because the tubular drill holes are slightly conical (wider at the top), meaning the tool being backed out wouldn't have left those marks.


There's also numerous examples of severe overcuts in the ancient stoneworks. If these stoneworks were made by primitives with copper chisels, stone pounders, and sand abrasives, there's no way in hell they'd make overcuts like that, as the work involved is either impossible, or would involve several hundreds of manhours. These overcuts are examples of how easily and rapidly they could cut into stone.



Going back to the polygonal stonework, the work involved is astronomical, if not impossible, for us to do today. I don't think people adequately understand what's involved in making just one single polygonal stone, where every single surface is non-linear (wavy), the stone itself is a weird shape (not a simple 6 sided block), and fits together with less than 1mm tolerance to each adjoining block. To do today, in a modern rock quarry, you'd have to design each stone first inside computer software, so each block design could marry up against each adjoining block. Just the computer work itself, given the non-linear surfaces, would be a lot. Then, you'd have to have some way to 3D print life size templates that could be used in the quarry. Given how weirdly shaped most of these stones are, each side of each block would need its own 3D template. You'd have to quarry a stone of adequate size, which isn't difficult. But, then it'd need to be taken to a saw shop, and sawn down to a rough shape. Keep in mind that with the weird shape most of the stones are, and the non-linear surfaces, that these saw cuts would have to be stopped part way, and leave a lot of material left on the stone, to allow other people to chisel away the excess, and produce the wavy surfaces. Then, once done with sawing, someone would have to chisel these stones, by hand, for thousands of hours. Each surface, of each stone, would need to be pain stakingly chiseled, to match the 3D template. They'd have to chisel away a little bit of material, check with the template, mark high spots, chisel a little bit again, check with the template, mark high spots, chisel a little bit again, over and over and over and over. The work itself isn't impossible. It's the precision. To get that precise, would take thousands of hours, just on chisel work, for each stone. Some of the larger stones would take tens of thousands of hours. No company, no government, on earth, can do this right now. It's unfeasible.


Check out this video from Uncharted X where he shows proof that these stones are polygonal on all surfaces (timestamp beginning at 13:30 going to 18:00):


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyLS2-trnl0


Uncharted X has probably been the best resource (at least for me), on evidence of advanced ancient tech. There are certainly a lot of other people discussing this, though. So, I'm not just pulling all of this info out of thin air. This is the kind of stuff that's hand waved away by modern archaeologists. A lot of other stuff is literally censored, buried, or disappeared because of how out of place (contradictory) it is to the "official" historical timeline.

I've heard of him, but not done any extensive research on the subject. Basic search results say he was descended from Amerindians based on DNA testing, even though he has Caucasoid features. Are they fudging the DNA results? If so, it wouldn't surprise me, given how much they mess with all the other genetic testing, in general.

That's interesting, but disregarding census data and speaking of personal view, many Americans do hold this view, I've heard people lump Spaniards and Portuguese together with Mexican mestizos.

Ah, ok. Those Godless tyrants. Agreed with all the rest, too. Shame, looking back shows me how kiked this country was, and so little knew it. We basically lined up willingly and as quickly as possible to go die against and kill our brothers. Those faggots wore it as a badge of honor, and it’s seen in the subsequent actions that the jew sent us to die for sheckels.

Lol which is ironic since just a few decades later besides the economic part the Soviet side was much much more truly "conservative".