Got 'em.
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I've worked in rocks quarries. I've chiseled rock by hand, and used modern machinery, in the quarry and in saw shops, to work and shape stone, for thousands of hours. Looking at the polygonal stonework, specifically in Peru and Egypt, and the enormous stones on the bottom layers in many other locations, I have no idea how they did it.
It's not just me saying it, either. Other professionals, in stone working and in other fields, have no idea how it was done. Christopher Dunn, for example, asked rock quarries and professional stone workers how much it would cost, and the work involved, to create just single pieces of stones to mimic what we see in many of these ancient ruins. Either the work couldn't be done (the stone would have to be worked in several pieces, to be able to work it at all, and to transport it, given the massive size and weight of these stones, and then bolted together on site), or it would cost millions of dollars, for one single stone.
Look into the Egyptian drill cores. They were able to drill into rock with a hollow circular drill tube, which was 1/8" thick, at a work rate (how much the drill can cut into the material per revolution of the drill) over 500 times faster than our best drills we have today. Every single one of these drill cores has tool marks on it, showing how fast the drill could advance into the stone. The mainstream archaeologists lie about this, claiming the tool marks are parallel (not spiral), and even cant the pictures of the drill cores in textbooks slightly to "prove" they're parallel, even when laymen can go to museums and put string on these drill cores and wrap it around, proving the tool marks are spiral. The tool marks also weren't made by backing out the drill bit, because the tubular drill holes are slightly conical (wider at the top), meaning the tool being backed out wouldn't have left those marks.
There's also numerous examples of severe overcuts in the ancient stoneworks. If these stoneworks were made by primitives with copper chisels, stone pounders, and sand abrasives, there's no way in hell they'd make overcuts like that, as the work involved is either impossible, or would involve several hundreds of manhours. These overcuts are examples of how easily and rapidly they could cut into stone.
Going back to the polygonal stonework, the work involved is astronomical, if not impossible, for us to do today. I don't think people adequately understand what's involved in making just one single polygonal stone, where every single surface is non-linear (wavy), the stone itself is a weird shape (not a simple 6 sided block), and fits together with less than 1mm tolerance to each adjoining block. To do today, in a modern rock quarry, you'd have to design each stone first inside computer software, so each block design could marry up against each adjoining block. Just the computer work itself, given the non-linear surfaces, would be a lot. Then, you'd have to have some way to 3D print life size templates that could be used in the quarry. Given how weirdly shaped most of these stones are, each side of each block would need its own 3D template. You'd have to quarry a stone of adequate size, which isn't difficult. But, then it'd need to be taken to a saw shop, and sawn down to a rough shape. Keep in mind that with the weird shape most of the stones are, and the non-linear surfaces, that these saw cuts would have to be stopped part way, and leave a lot of material left on the stone, to allow other people to chisel away the excess, and produce the wavy surfaces. Then, once done with sawing, someone would have to chisel these stones, by hand, for thousands of hours. Each surface, of each stone, would need to be pain stakingly chiseled, to match the 3D template. They'd have to chisel away a little bit of material, check with the template, mark high spots, chisel a little bit again, check with the template, mark high spots, chisel a little bit again, over and over and over and over. The work itself isn't impossible. It's the precision. To get that precise, would take thousands of hours, just on chisel work, for each stone. Some of the larger stones would take tens of thousands of hours. No company, no government, on earth, can do this right now. It's unfeasible.
Check out this video from Uncharted X where he shows proof that these stones are polygonal on all surfaces (timestamp beginning at 13:30 going to 18:00):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyLS2-trnl0
Uncharted X has probably been the best resource (at least for me), on evidence of advanced ancient tech. There are certainly a lot of other people discussing this, though. So, I'm not just pulling all of this info out of thin air. This is the kind of stuff that's hand waved away by modern archaeologists. A lot of other stuff is literally censored, buried, or disappeared because of how out of place (contradictory) it is to the "official" historical timeline.
Mysteriously Universe did an episode where some geologists proved that some of the huge megalithic stones in Peru had molecular signs of vitrification. They were melted to the consistency of putty, and then placed. Many of the really big stones had ‘love handles’ along the bottom from the weight pressing down as it solidified. This is tech we don’t have. When they presented the evidence in Peru, they were asked to leave the country.
There's lots of theories and speculation that the advanced ancient builders could mould, shape, and/or cut stone really easily, or even pour it like concrete (geopolymer). There's really old tales of something called the "Shamir", which could supposedly cut through stone and metal like magic. This was probably just an advanced machine, maybe using a special resonance to work the stone, or even highly radioactive decay to burn away the material (I heard that one from a nuclear physicist). There's also the theory that all the "cart ruts" (the deep grooves in the bedrock) surrounding many of these ancient sites is caused by that Shamir machine, which could've deformed the rock it moved over while it was running.
No one is exactly sure what those nubs (or love handles) are on the all the stones (seen in Egypt and Peru). The mainstream explanation is that they were tie off points for ropes, but that doesn't make sense, given where many of those nubs are located relative to where the stones were placed. The geopolymer theorists say that those are pouring points for the mould that they would've later ground down to match the surrounding surface. But, the workmen didn't get around to doing it, which brings up another interesting topic.
Tons of these ancient sites, all over the globe, had incredibly advanced stone work being done, but it looks like they were interrupted, and the work was stopped midway, as if some cataclysm struck and they had to flee. For example, the half finished smoothing of the lower courses of stones on one of the Giza pyramids (the non finished stones have a pillow like outer surface), the halfassed placement of the Serapeum boxes, the nubs all over many of the stones, etc.
I just find this topic endlessly fascinating. If you're into this sort of thing, definitely check out UnchartedX and Brothers of the Serpent podcast.
I’ve watched a few UnchartedX episodes this evening. Thanks for the tip.