Protocols of of the Elders of Zion were debunked by a Jew
(files.catbox.moe)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
That's extremely very much begging the question. There's nothing to that that precludes it being a based false flag, except that maybe whoever created it could have had more foresight than his semi-retarded peers.
This was written in the 20th century. The world was becoming a vastly more connected place even by then. This wasn't "rile up the local peasants so they go drown a witch". If you went back to the 1500s with the Protocols, probably even fervent jew-haters wouldn't have the geopolitical intelligence to actually understand what the fuck it was talking about.
What?
Dude I'm saying *we* probably made that shit up. Of *course* it would "reveal all their plans", that would literally be the entire point of faking it.
And I mean don't act like the right doesn't do this shit all the time. Every fucking time there's a left-wing protest freakout someone comes up with some "Craigslist ad asking to hire paid protesters!" like that shit wasn't made the fuck up.
Considering the protocols were probably made around the 1800s, that would require either /ourguys/ in Russia being literal prophets, or the jews being so comically stupid and evil at the same time they actually took a forgery and made it their entire game-plan for world domination.
This is kind of my point though: the protocols only have "value" in that they can be an attempt to say 'Look the jews are so evil they wrote this admitting to all their plans!'
That kind of means the protocols are worthless though. Because you can just *point out the plans* without ever having to wave the Protocols around.
Because the Protocols are of such unknown origin and unsubstantiated, it's a liability to use them as evidence, so it's really best to just ignore them. After all if everything in them is true, you can just extract that information and point out the true parts, and not mention the document at all.