New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
33
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +33Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
What is in the protocols you'd call anachronistic? It's not like 'noticing' is a recent invention.

This is kind of my point though: the protocols only have "value" in that they can be an attempt to say 'Look the jews are so evil they wrote this admitting to all their plans!'

That kind of means the protocols are worthless though. Because you can just *point out the plans* without ever having to wave the Protocols around.

Because the Protocols are of such unknown origin and unsubstantiated, it's a liability to use them as evidence, so it's really best to just ignore them. After all if everything in them is true, you can just extract that information and point out the true parts, and not mention the document at all.
Toast message