New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
33
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +33Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>So even if they forged it to discredit it

What?

Dude I'm saying *we* probably made that shit up. Of *course* it would "reveal all their plans", that would literally be the entire point of faking it.

And I mean don't act like the right doesn't do this shit all the time. Every fucking time there's a left-wing protest freakout someone comes up with some "Craigslist ad asking to hire paid protesters!" like that shit wasn't made the fuck up.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>Dude I'm saying we probably made that shit up

Considering the protocols were probably made around the 1800s, that would require either /ourguys/ in Russia being literal prophets, or the jews being so comically stupid and evil at the same time they actually took a forgery and made it their entire game-plan for world domination.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
What is in the protocols you'd call anachronistic? It's not like 'noticing' is a recent invention.

This is kind of my point though: the protocols only have "value" in that they can be an attempt to say 'Look the jews are so evil they wrote this admitting to all their plans!'

That kind of means the protocols are worthless though. Because you can just *point out the plans* without ever having to wave the Protocols around.

Because the Protocols are of such unknown origin and unsubstantiated, it's a liability to use them as evidence, so it's really best to just ignore them. After all if everything in them is true, you can just extract that information and point out the true parts, and not mention the document at all.
Toast message