New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
33
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +33Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Right, but you said it yourself: *maybe maybe maybe*.

They appeared out of thin air with no attribution, no historical reference point, no chain of custody.

Consider this: if the Protocols were *fake*, basically a false-flag document written to drive sentiment against jews, what would be different about them? Would they actually say anything differently? Would they have similarly just kind of 'appeared'? Would there also be no real historical record mentioning their existence?

I submit that there would not be. I think taking the Protocols seriously is a big unforced error. There's no benefit to believing they're real, and no matter what people here claim, yes, there *is always* a chance it's a fake, and it's not a low chance.

So is it worth weakening your own position with a piece of evidence that could be faked, and nobody actually knows either way? No, I don't think it is.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>f the Protocols were fake, basically a false-flag document written to drive sentiment against jews, what would be different about them? Would they actually say anything differently?

I mean, the protocols document a long term game-plan, so theyre easily brushed off, if someone actually wanted to forge a document to cause a pogrom, it would be something document an immediate threat, like mass well poisonings going on or something.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>I mean, the protocols document a long term game-plan, so theyre easily brushed off, if someone actually wanted to forge a document to cause a pogrom, it would be something document an immediate threat, like mass well poisonings going on or something.

That's extremely very much begging the question. There's nothing to that that precludes it being a based false flag, except that maybe whoever created it could have had more foresight than his semi-retarded peers.

This was written in the 20th century. The world was becoming a vastly more connected place even by then. This wasn't "rile up the local peasants so they go drown a witch". If you went back to the 1500s with the Protocols, probably even fervent jew-haters wouldn't have the geopolitical intelligence to actually understand what the fuck it was talking about.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
But for a false flag, it basically reveals most of their plans anyway. So even if they forged it to discredit it, its still credible because they still do exactly what it says theyre going to.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>So even if they forged it to discredit it

What?

Dude I'm saying *we* probably made that shit up. Of *course* it would "reveal all their plans", that would literally be the entire point of faking it.

And I mean don't act like the right doesn't do this shit all the time. Every fucking time there's a left-wing protest freakout someone comes up with some "Craigslist ad asking to hire paid protesters!" like that shit wasn't made the fuck up.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>Dude I'm saying we probably made that shit up

Considering the protocols were probably made around the 1800s, that would require either /ourguys/ in Russia being literal prophets, or the jews being so comically stupid and evil at the same time they actually took a forgery and made it their entire game-plan for world domination.
Toast message