Protocols of of the Elders of Zion were debunked by a Jew
(files.catbox.moe)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
The entire thing reads like ConPro fanfiction anyway.
They appeared out of thin air with no attribution, no historical reference point, no chain of custody.
Consider this: if the Protocols were *fake*, basically a false-flag document written to drive sentiment against jews, what would be different about them? Would they actually say anything differently? Would they have similarly just kind of 'appeared'? Would there also be no real historical record mentioning their existence?
I submit that there would not be. I think taking the Protocols seriously is a big unforced error. There's no benefit to believing they're real, and no matter what people here claim, yes, there *is always* a chance it's a fake, and it's not a low chance.
So is it worth weakening your own position with a piece of evidence that could be faked, and nobody actually knows either way? No, I don't think it is.
I mean, the protocols document a long term game-plan, so theyre easily brushed off, if someone actually wanted to forge a document to cause a pogrom, it would be something document an immediate threat, like mass well poisonings going on or something.
That's extremely very much begging the question. There's nothing to that that precludes it being a based false flag, except that maybe whoever created it could have had more foresight than his semi-retarded peers.
This was written in the 20th century. The world was becoming a vastly more connected place even by then. This wasn't "rile up the local peasants so they go drown a witch". If you went back to the 1500s with the Protocols, probably even fervent jew-haters wouldn't have the geopolitical intelligence to actually understand what the fuck it was talking about.