1 year ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)2 children
>Usually the more Christian stuff they have the less likely they are to wake up.
Not in my case, no. Atheists are harder to redpill because they just tip their fedora and say "all religions are the same!" when you bring up any critique of judaism. Many won't condemn it specifically. They'll simply dismiss it as not being any more of a particular danger. Similar issue with Islam.
With Christians you can more easily demonstrate the *direct opposition* of jews towards Christianity, both in their own writings (I like to reference Gittin 57A from the Talmud), and in their involvement with anti-Christian organizations. You can also reference the writings of various Orthodox, Catholic, and Protestant authors across different countries over centuries that warn against the jews, that demonstrate that they are a perennial threat to Christendom, everywhere.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
And what did it stand for, exactly?
I keep arguing Christianity on this forum, but honestly nobody has ever explained to me what values Christianity brings that would benefit White men.
The promise of eternal life is all that Christianity offers, and even that is not guaranteed.
As a side note, I've been away for a few months and I come back and now I don't see the merchant's hands against new users anymore. What happened, did the Scored admins thought they were too spicy and removed the boards' abilities to have custom icons?
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
It's your behaviors in the pursuit of attaining that eternal life which will benefit you, or White people in general. Its all the physical and social values that you have to get in order first that directly lead to positive secular benefits. For instance, the Christian emphasis on marriage and family life. Not slutting around, not getting divorced, having kids and raising a family. All of this creates the nuclear family, the cornerstone of the Volk. And it is directly downstream from a Christian *Weltanschauung*; marriage being a sacrament, etc. Non-Christians do not have as strong of a reasoning behind this because in their mind, they can pack up and leave whenever they want. Not so in Christian, or at least *real* Christian, teaching.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
> Christian emphasis on marriage and family life.
This is not what we need.
What we need is marriage and family life **of pure race White people with a high genetic quality**.
Christianity blessing the marriage of a White woman with a nigger is a damage to the Volk. Christianity encouraging even retards and mentally ill people to have children is a damage to the Volk. Christianity telling a woman that she should not abort a fetus that is found to have genetic defects is a damage to the Volk.
Christianity is an egalitarian moment. This makes it incompatible with the preservation of the Aryan race.
This doesn't make any logical sense I'm afraid. Jews can logically hate Christianity thinking that it's a corruption of their own religion and not wanting other Jews to fall for it.
Jews never try to convert people to judaism. They do not spread a gospel to non-jews. In fact, when you point out that someone is jewish, they recoil and act like you have undisguised them. They are devils.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
For most of its history, the church has been explicitly antisemitic. And so was Luther.
Just like Judaism has always been Anti-Christian, more so than any other faith system.
It's no coincidence that Judeo-Bolshevism violently opposed and persecuted Christendom.
In fact, one might say collective jewry is the Antichrist.
Find me one quote from any pope that is even remotely antisemitic. I only want one.
The Catholic Church being "antisemitic" is just a myth that derives from the usual habit of the Jews to claim that anyone who doesn't completely surrender to them is "antisemitic". In truth the Catholic Church never killed a single Jew and sided with them at the time of the Third Reich.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
https://files.catbox.moe/zvaj4n.mp4
I can verify all but the second one. Innocent III was perhaps my favorite because in addition to forbidding jews to hold public office, he also compelled them to wear the judenhut, ye olde equivalent of the judenstern.
I share your belief in that throughout the centuries, the Catholic Church routinely dropped the ball when it came to dealing with them (except during the Inquisition, I daresay at *least* one jew was killed therein, also invalidating your statement). Christianity's major flaw has always been seeing the jewish problem as a religious one and not as a racial one, which is what has led to all the mistakes. You can strike it for that, at the very least.
Luther was extremely counter-semitic though, that fact is undeniable. He wrote a whole book about it too.
I cannot open catbox with any of my VPNs, unfortunately. Can you share the quotes in some other way please?
> except during the Inquisition, I daresay at least one jew was killed therein, also invalidating your statement
The Inquisition only went after Jews who *pretended* to be Christians to avoid restrictions. It didn't touch anyone solely for being a Jew.
You surely have noticed a pattern: Jews cry about antisemitism if a Jew suffers consequences for his actions even if these consequences have nothing to do with him being a Jew. These is where the claims of antisemitism against the Catholic Church come from.
> Luther was extremely counter-semitic though, that fact is undeniable. He wrote a whole book about it too.
Oh yes, he wrote a book complaining that the Jews are racist and saying that racism is bad.
But what is more striking is that Luther doesn't advocate violence against Jews (in spite of recognizing in his book that they want to kill us all), but he did advocate violence against the revolting peasants.
Not in my case, no. Atheists are harder to redpill because they just tip their fedora and say "all religions are the same!" when you bring up any critique of judaism. Many won't condemn it specifically. They'll simply dismiss it as not being any more of a particular danger. Similar issue with Islam.
With Christians you can more easily demonstrate the *direct opposition* of jews towards Christianity, both in their own writings (I like to reference Gittin 57A from the Talmud), and in their involvement with anti-Christian organizations. You can also reference the writings of various Orthodox, Catholic, and Protestant authors across different countries over centuries that warn against the jews, that demonstrate that they are a perennial threat to Christendom, everywhere.
That's how *I'm* here, after all.
It's almost like Christianity is Jewish.
I keep arguing Christianity on this forum, but honestly nobody has ever explained to me what values Christianity brings that would benefit White men.
The promise of eternal life is all that Christianity offers, and even that is not guaranteed.
As a side note, I've been away for a few months and I come back and now I don't see the merchant's hands against new users anymore. What happened, did the Scored admins thought they were too spicy and removed the boards' abilities to have custom icons?
Hating fags is no achievement lol
This is not what we need.
What we need is marriage and family life **of pure race White people with a high genetic quality**.
Christianity blessing the marriage of a White woman with a nigger is a damage to the Volk. Christianity encouraging even retards and mentally ill people to have children is a damage to the Volk. Christianity telling a woman that she should not abort a fetus that is found to have genetic defects is a damage to the Volk.
Christianity is an egalitarian moment. This makes it incompatible with the preservation of the Aryan race.
Just like Judaism has always been Anti-Christian, more so than any other faith system.
It's no coincidence that Judeo-Bolshevism violently opposed and persecuted Christendom.
In fact, one might say collective jewry is the Antichrist.
Find me one quote from any pope that is even remotely antisemitic. I only want one.
The Catholic Church being "antisemitic" is just a myth that derives from the usual habit of the Jews to claim that anyone who doesn't completely surrender to them is "antisemitic". In truth the Catholic Church never killed a single Jew and sided with them at the time of the Third Reich.
I can verify all but the second one. Innocent III was perhaps my favorite because in addition to forbidding jews to hold public office, he also compelled them to wear the judenhut, ye olde equivalent of the judenstern.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Innocent_III#Fourth_Council_of_the_Lateran
I share your belief in that throughout the centuries, the Catholic Church routinely dropped the ball when it came to dealing with them (except during the Inquisition, I daresay at *least* one jew was killed therein, also invalidating your statement). Christianity's major flaw has always been seeing the jewish problem as a religious one and not as a racial one, which is what has led to all the mistakes. You can strike it for that, at the very least.
Luther was extremely counter-semitic though, that fact is undeniable. He wrote a whole book about it too.
> except during the Inquisition, I daresay at least one jew was killed therein, also invalidating your statement
The Inquisition only went after Jews who *pretended* to be Christians to avoid restrictions. It didn't touch anyone solely for being a Jew.
You surely have noticed a pattern: Jews cry about antisemitism if a Jew suffers consequences for his actions even if these consequences have nothing to do with him being a Jew. These is where the claims of antisemitism against the Catholic Church come from.
> Luther was extremely counter-semitic though, that fact is undeniable. He wrote a whole book about it too.
Oh yes, he wrote a book complaining that the Jews are racist and saying that racism is bad.
But what is more striking is that Luther doesn't advocate violence against Jews (in spite of recognizing in his book that they want to kill us all), but he did advocate violence against the revolting peasants.