Oy vey..
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I keep arguing Christianity on this forum, but honestly nobody has ever explained to me what values Christianity brings that would benefit White men.
The promise of eternal life is all that Christianity offers, and even that is not guaranteed.
As a side note, I've been away for a few months and I come back and now I don't see the merchant's hands against new users anymore. What happened, did the Scored admins thought they were too spicy and removed the boards' abilities to have custom icons?
Hating fags is no achievement lol
This is not what we need.
What we need is marriage and family life **of pure race White people with a high genetic quality**.
Christianity blessing the marriage of a White woman with a nigger is a damage to the Volk. Christianity encouraging even retards and mentally ill people to have children is a damage to the Volk. Christianity telling a woman that she should not abort a fetus that is found to have genetic defects is a damage to the Volk.
Christianity is an egalitarian moment. This makes it incompatible with the preservation of the Aryan race.
See, for me the real issue is not the lack of family values. For me the real issue is the deterioration of the genetic quality of our race. Lower social classes have many more children than the higher social classes, which tend to be genetically superior. This has been recognized as a problem for centuries, but now with feminism this problem has reached catastrophic proportions. An intelligent woman today is more likely to become a scientist and leave zero children behind, while back then an intelligent woman would produce several children and therefore several generations of male scientists. I am certain that White people today are less intelligent than 100 years ago. And also less healthy, less fit.
Christian values that promote every man to have children with one woman are never going to be able to reverse that. What we need is eugenics. The inferior part of the population must be forbidden from reproducing, the average must be left alone, and the top 10% of the population (in terms of intelligence, creativity, beauty, strength, health) must be made to breed like rabbits.
This can happen only if we accept that human lives can be worth more or less than others. The life of a strong and beautiful and intelligent man is worth more than the life of a fat ugly retard. Can Christianity accept this?
And that's an infinitesimally minuscule percentage of all marriages blessed. Miscegenation is pushed on us by kikes, not the Church. Do away with kikes and that problem goes away.
>Christianity telling a woman that she should not abort a fetus that is found to have genetic defects is a damage to the Volk.
If said fetus is White, then that's a good thing. We do not have anywhere *near* the shortage or scarcity of resources that would necessitate such an extreme eugenics program. If humanity was on the verge of *extinction* then yeah, I could see that being necessary. But in the absence of that, all White lives are precious and should be preserved. They don't have to *reproduce*, but they don't have to be killed.
>This makes it incompatible with the preservation of the Aryan race.
Well it's preserved it for going on 2 millennia now, so that's a pretty good track record IMO. If you can show me anything with a *better* one, I'll look into it.
I see way too many White women with niggers, it's not an infinitesimally minuscule percentage.
Miscegenation is simply inevitable under a religion that claims that all humans have been created by the same Father, hence that we are all brothers. In fact the Church has *never* opposed miscegenation. It's not like for faggots for which it changed its stance due to political expediency; the Church has never seen anything wrong with miscegenation.
On the other hand Christianity would forbid me from marrying a Christian White woman, even if I'm 100% White and perfectly healthy both physically and mentally.
> If said fetus is White, then that's a good thing.
How can it be a good thing to produce a dysfunctional human being that can contribute nothing to society and instead will have to drain resources away from the healthy individuals?
It is a crime against Nature that our society dedicates more resources to retards instead of spending those resources on our most intelligent. Aktion T4 didn't go far enough; anyone who is not self-sufficient should be gassed.
> Well it's preserved it for going on 2 millennia now, so that's a pretty good track record IMO.
In those 2 millennia we never faced the problems that we face today. Globalization due to technology, and especially inferior subhumans breeding like cockroaches and infesting the whole planet. For the vast majority of Christianity's existence niggers were just not a thing as far as Europeans were concerned.
What is Christianity's answer to the nigger problem, exactly?
> If you can show me anything with a better one, I'll look into it.
National Socialism.
And yet, it didn't happen for *centuries* until the jews started their mass immigration and miscegenation propaganda, huh.
>On the other hand Christianity would forbid me from marrying a Christian White woman, even if I'm 100% White and perfectly healthy both physically and mentally.
In 1 Corinthians chapter 7 we find:
>If any brother [Christian] has a wife who is an unbeliever but is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. And if any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever but is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. The unbelieving husband is consecrated by his believing wife; the unbelieving wife is consecrated by her believing husband...Wife, how do you know that you will not save your husband; or you, husband, that you will not save your wife?
Personally, I don't think one should marry the other unless they are completely on the same page about Christianity. The conversion should ideally take place *prior* to marriage, in my mind, but that's just me. But Paul is making it quite clear that we *do* have a duty to try and save our potentially unbelieving spouse.
>How can it be a good thing to produce a dysfunctional human being that can contribute nothing to society and instead will have to drain resources away from the healthy individuals?
Even retards can be trained to do productive things. And if we have plenty of resources to go around, there's simply no reason to be barbaric. Our kindness and empathy towards others is exactly what makes us White. You may not like it at times (and to be fair, I do not either), but to forgo that is to forego what we are. Tamp down on the major causes of autism (vaccines, late pregnancies, etc.) and the problem will largely go away on its own. We don't have to jump right to "let's kill all the disabled" before we've tried less destructive methods at fixing the problem.
>It is a crime against Nature that our society dedicates more resources to retards instead of spending those resources on our most intelligent
We can still dedicate a *vast majority* of our resources to servicing the most intelligent. Modern technology enables us to produce more resources than ever before. Surely we can spare a little.
>For the vast majority of Christianity's existence niggers were just not a thing as far as Europeans were concerned.
It wasn't Christians that made it the problem that it is though, it was jews. Lets worry about fixing the jewish problem first then, huh?