Hitler rolling over in his grave at 1488 RPM
(media.scored.co)
Procreation should be illegal if you’re a mixed couple.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
69 comments:
No. White males need to conquer and breed out.
Look at south America
Please explain to me how "conquering" a bunch of darkies results in stable offspring
Please explain to me how "conquering" a bunch of darkies results in stable offspring
If the choice is "no children" as is the case for beta numales, or "half white children" the choice should ALWAYS be the mongrel children and here is why:
1) take breeding options away from the other races males.
2) breed half of the opposing genes out, diluting their race.
3) weaken the other species with inferior beta numale genes.
White children are ideal, but half white children of inferior stock works for us as well.
1) take breeding options away from the other races males.
2) breed half of the opposing genes out, diluting their race.
3) weaken the other species with inferior beta numale genes.
White children are ideal, but half white children of inferior stock works for us as well.
>but half white children of inferior stock works for us as well.
No
No
Yes.
It destroys the other races by removing their mating partners, diluting their bloodlines, and weakening their communities while reducing anti white sentiment. Its the EXACT SAME SHIT they do to us except they have to send their best while we send our worst.
IF you are a soyboy cuck neet with no chance to procreate with a white woman, then at least use your inferior genetics to hinder our enemies.
It destroys the other races by removing their mating partners, diluting their bloodlines, and weakening their communities while reducing anti white sentiment. Its the EXACT SAME SHIT they do to us except they have to send their best while we send our worst.
IF you are a soyboy cuck neet with no chance to procreate with a white woman, then at least use your inferior genetics to hinder our enemies.
Eww race mixing 🤢
Are you retarded?
Look at the picture. That's you. Disgusting.
Insurgent?
Look at the picture. That's you. Disgusting.
Insurgent?
Sheboons are the lowest on the desirability totem. Have some respect, White Man.
ironically, black women marrying white men have by far the lowest divorce rate, even lower than all same-race couples... because no one wants black women, not even black men.
The last true Volkswagen "people's car" was the Mk2 Golf. Everything after that point became too entrenched in OBD garbage.
If cars followed the plane industry and basically stopped developing after 1990, the world would be a much better place.
If cars followed the plane industry and basically stopped developing after 1990, the world would be a much better place.
> and basically stopped developing after 1990
hah.
come down to the avionics bay with me sometime.
it's an entirely different world. different technologies. different strategies. different power distribution requirements. the engine systems alone are completely insane, and the number of sub computers that feed data into the FMS is outrageous.
plus.. they're getting digital messaging to ATC now.. and that feeds into the FMS and the pilot management desktop computer.
we used to weight fuel into these fuckers. now the plane has a fuel management computer. you just hook up, turn on the pump, and it handles the rest.
hah.
come down to the avionics bay with me sometime.
it's an entirely different world. different technologies. different strategies. different power distribution requirements. the engine systems alone are completely insane, and the number of sub computers that feed data into the FMS is outrageous.
plus.. they're getting digital messaging to ATC now.. and that feeds into the FMS and the pilot management desktop computer.
we used to weight fuel into these fuckers. now the plane has a fuel management computer. you just hook up, turn on the pump, and it handles the rest.
Cockpit-wise, yes. But the overwhelming exterior design of a modern jet hasn't changed at all since 1981's Boeing 767. We don't build tri-motor planes like the L1011 anymore and only use 4 engines in the biggest jumbos. The biggest development in those 40 years have been winglets/sharklets, and Airbus' "Zorro" mask. The bucket style thrust reversers that caused LDA004 are also long phased out.
Every plane that has come out since 2000 looks 90% the same as the one it replaced. Any attempt at evolving past that and introducing a completely brand new design (i.e. the Sonic Cruiser) invariably gets shot down.
Every plane that has come out since 2000 looks 90% the same as the one it replaced. Any attempt at evolving past that and introducing a completely brand new design (i.e. the Sonic Cruiser) invariably gets shot down.
He's wearing a wedding ring. They're likely married.
Her body language says she's embarrassed to be photographed with this cuckold faggot. His says he's stoked. It should be the other way around.
How fucking embarrassing for him.
Her body language says she's embarrassed to be photographed with this cuckold faggot. His says he's stoked. It should be the other way around.
How fucking embarrassing for him.
It’s an EV, it’s not awesome
I don't get the hate for EVs. They can be fueled at home, unlike gas cars. They have very few moving parts compared to gas cars, which means maintenance costs long-term are much lower (unless you have a Tesla which monopolizes repairs). They usually have extra storage space since electric motors are much smaller and simpler than internal combustion engines. The only argument against EVs is that they're not widespread enough yet to be able to effortlessly find a fueling location or a repair shop like you can for gas cars... But that argument is mercilessly being eroded as more people get EVs and subsequently more infrastructure is built for them.
The current battery technology is a complete joke. You have to factor in prevailing winds and expected A/C use to get any useful "range estimate" while travelling. The whole goddamn thing is so heavy it blows through tires which eats into your "maintenance savings" on those $50 oil changes. Laughably these things still have to have a separate 12V battery because they can't even figure basic usability out and if that dies you are 100% fucked anyways. Oh and have fun towing that heavy worthless bitch anywhere when that happens.
They're fucking retarded rich people toys. There is zero usable infrastructure for working people who make the mistake of owning one. After three years they turn into full on money pits and all that EV shit has to get thrown away, or sent to india, so some street shitter can "recycle" it.
Mostly I hate that arrogant dickweeds who have no real experience in the actual world think they're "ready" to be used and push them on people like they're saving the planet or something. South Park Prius fart smelling joke was completely on point.
They're fucking retarded rich people toys. There is zero usable infrastructure for working people who make the mistake of owning one. After three years they turn into full on money pits and all that EV shit has to get thrown away, or sent to india, so some street shitter can "recycle" it.
Mostly I hate that arrogant dickweeds who have no real experience in the actual world think they're "ready" to be used and push them on people like they're saving the planet or something. South Park Prius fart smelling joke was completely on point.
> which means maintenance costs long-term are much lower
Yeah until you need to replace the battery and its a $15k repair bill at the minimum.
> The only argument against EVs is that they're not widespread enough yet to be able to effortlessly find a fueling location
Thats the “only” argument? I see why you don’t understand the hate for EVs.
Yeah until you need to replace the battery and its a $15k repair bill at the minimum.
> The only argument against EVs is that they're not widespread enough yet to be able to effortlessly find a fueling location
Thats the “only” argument? I see why you don’t understand the hate for EVs.
What's the lifespan of an EV battery? Go ahead and include that as a long-term cost, and then compare it to combustion engine repairs over the same time frame. I think either you're being disingenuous or you're just unaware of the long-term cost comparison. As a 30-year-old, I've owned 2 cars over the past 14 years and paid thousands in repair bills and some ungodly amount for gas to keep them operational. When I compare this to upkeep costs of an EV over the same time frame, it makes me wish there was a cheaper EV on the market.
I’ve owned more cars than I can remember. Buy a toyota camry and you can literally not change the oil once (not recommended) and it’ll still outlast any junk EV car you throw at it.
> I think either you're being disingenuous or you're just unaware of the long-term cost comparison.
You think wrong. And you’re ignorant. It’s not my job to educate you. Do some research into the issues EVs face, it’s more than just “not enough charging stations”.
Theres a reason why most companies are regretting ever building these junk cars that nobody wants to buy.
> and some ungodly amount for gas to keep them operational.
You must think electricity is free lmao.
> When I compare this to upkeep costs of an EV over the same time frame
You are the type of person to think a balloon loan is a good idea. Because thats what an EV is in terms of maintenance.
> I think either you're being disingenuous or you're just unaware of the long-term cost comparison.
You think wrong. And you’re ignorant. It’s not my job to educate you. Do some research into the issues EVs face, it’s more than just “not enough charging stations”.
Theres a reason why most companies are regretting ever building these junk cars that nobody wants to buy.
> and some ungodly amount for gas to keep them operational.
You must think electricity is free lmao.
> When I compare this to upkeep costs of an EV over the same time frame
You are the type of person to think a balloon loan is a good idea. Because thats what an EV is in terms of maintenance.
The real reason (((they))) push it is because China can't produce a functional internal combustion engine like White countries can, it requires precision and you simply can't cheat with mechanical stuff.
By forcing EVs you give China an advantage because the battery is just a soggy bag of chemicals, so simple that even bugmen can produce it cheap using slave labor and cheat as they always do. This will not only kill the western car industry, but also flood our roads with inferior cars full of (((planned obsolesce))) that lacks basic safety and will blow up at any time.
> I don't get the hate for EVs. They can be fueled at home, unlike gas cars.
This is stupid, get a few jerry cans and you can fill up your car at home any time you want. Much safer than charging too. BTW, did you know that gas station are controlled environments, safe from accidents such as fire or explosions, unlike your home? Refueling/charging is a risky task, and nothing you want to do too close to your house in case something explodes.
> They have very few moving parts compared to gas cars
Volvos redblock engine can outlive you if you as a kid gets to inherit your grandpas old 240. I wouldn't be too worried about muh moving parts. Just change oil and filters regularly and the engine will run forever. Unlike batteries which will only last for 10 years at most.
> The only argument against EVs is that they're not widespread enough yet to be able to effortlessly find a fueling location or a repair shop like you can for gas cars... But that argument is mercilessly being eroded as more people get EVs and subsequently more infrastructure is built for them.
Any man can repair a car with an internal combustion engine anywhere, using basic tools, you can also transport liquid fuel much easier, even if the nearest gas station would be hundreds of miles away.
You can't fix an EV (or most complex electric appliances), either it works or it doesn't. The power grid also don't reach far outside the cities with enough power to run a charger that can recharge in a significant time, say less than an hour. This makes them useless for long trips. A city car basically. And why the hell would you need a car if you live in a city that has buses, trains and nice bicycle lanes.
EVs are retarded.
By forcing EVs you give China an advantage because the battery is just a soggy bag of chemicals, so simple that even bugmen can produce it cheap using slave labor and cheat as they always do. This will not only kill the western car industry, but also flood our roads with inferior cars full of (((planned obsolesce))) that lacks basic safety and will blow up at any time.
> I don't get the hate for EVs. They can be fueled at home, unlike gas cars.
This is stupid, get a few jerry cans and you can fill up your car at home any time you want. Much safer than charging too. BTW, did you know that gas station are controlled environments, safe from accidents such as fire or explosions, unlike your home? Refueling/charging is a risky task, and nothing you want to do too close to your house in case something explodes.
> They have very few moving parts compared to gas cars
Volvos redblock engine can outlive you if you as a kid gets to inherit your grandpas old 240. I wouldn't be too worried about muh moving parts. Just change oil and filters regularly and the engine will run forever. Unlike batteries which will only last for 10 years at most.
> The only argument against EVs is that they're not widespread enough yet to be able to effortlessly find a fueling location or a repair shop like you can for gas cars... But that argument is mercilessly being eroded as more people get EVs and subsequently more infrastructure is built for them.
Any man can repair a car with an internal combustion engine anywhere, using basic tools, you can also transport liquid fuel much easier, even if the nearest gas station would be hundreds of miles away.
You can't fix an EV (or most complex electric appliances), either it works or it doesn't. The power grid also don't reach far outside the cities with enough power to run a charger that can recharge in a significant time, say less than an hour. This makes them useless for long trips. A city car basically. And why the hell would you need a car if you live in a city that has buses, trains and nice bicycle lanes.
EVs are retarded.
A lot of this is just arguments for gas cars, which is fine. I certainly don't want to ban them. I think everyone should be able to choose what they think works better for them. So I don't get the foaming at the mouth hatred for EVs.
That's alright, I can respect that. Most of my hate is against the jew anyway, EVs shouldn't have subsidies or be able to drive around tax free while I have to pay insane taxes for my gas cars. Us gas car drivers are actually dependent on our cars unlike EV drivers. It's not too much to demand same tax rate for everyone, because roads cost money to build and maintain and someone has to pay for it. Heck I'm all for a fat tax on people walking on sidewalks too, because fat people causes more wear on those paths.
Hitler would be happy about a nigger and Jew getting together.
There's a reason this looks like every bullshit diversity subversion advert on the tv. Because that is exactly what it is.
Toast message
X
Nigress who looks like every diversity hire in every single ad ever.
A match made in hell.