You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
13
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
1 year ago13 points(+0/-0/+13Score on mirror)3 children
Its damned if you do damned if you don't damned if you are in fear of being damned in the first place here.
On one hand, these jews can't push porn anymore if they pull out but that removes freedom of choice for adults. Gay.
On the other hand, requiring someone to give their identity to jews for blackmail is empowering them to control you. Gay.
On the third hand, needing a service for degen porn shit run by jews has already rotted your brain and wounded your concepts for real healthy relationships anyways. Gay.
Its overall good and I support it but it doesn't cross major privacy and freedom lines that shouldn't be crossed.
I don't support government protecting me from anything, because they won't. There will still be all sorts of ways to get around it for kids while creating justification for mandatory digital ID.
**I** protect **my** people. My kids don't go looking for porn because I've made a point to mock it their entire lives; they know it exists but they also know it's "cringe".
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Te downside is a theoretical one of privacy and freedom. The upside is concrete in reduction of degeneracy. I support the move, but it does invite a discussion of "where does personal freedom end" and thats a slippery slope both ways
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
>theoretical one of privacy and freedom
By negation, I guess. Having a proven list of people who are degenerates intrinsically creates a list of people who are not degenerates… plus some degenerates who bypass the list. Those who debase themselves *should* be known. It *should* factor into one’s consideration of whether you’re going to engage in a particular vice. If we want to reclaim the very idea of “society,” we have to reinstate the internal, passive societal protections we had for millennia.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Yeah, but who defines "vice"?
This is a wedge that allows government to later justify requiring ID for even more things. Youtube is already divided into "adult" and "kid" sections; will that require ID? What about Reddit and Communities? What about non-filtered search results? AI services?
It also puts a real logistical burden on websites which big corpos can absorb but which can prevent small sites from even getting started. Imagine if you want to make an un-Jewed search engine in your garage. Well, now you need to implement a government digital ID scheme which is more expensive and time consuming that the entire rest of the site.
Governments do not do things because it's morally right, ever.
I agree, and I think that to be perfectly clear we would want that and everything else everyone does(not just porn) to be visible and transparent to EVERYONE else. If everything we said and did was public info people would be very different.
The problem with that is that if a group can coerce power to make undesired thoughts illegal you would have a police state like the Soviet union.
I think that if all of it was public - what kind of porn you watched, what forums you go to, who you vote for, where you shop, etc. If everyone who was racist was shown publicly there would be a lot more push back against this multicultural nonsense because regular fearful people would realize they ARENT ALONE. but. Then people are put in danger for their beliefs (us especially) if they are NOT the controlling group.
The problem is, what they are doing is used against dissidents like us. Just imagine there is something like an "internet pass" every person must have, and when registering one needs to show it. So all websites can directly report a person to the ZOG police for wrong-think.
In Germany it would mean you say the holocaust is a hoax, you'll get reported and the police is knocking on your door, and get put in jail until you publicly admin the errors of your ways. In England you say perhaps they went a little overboard with immigration, and you get gang-raped by niggers in jail. In the US it's the banker jews that fuck you over (debanking) if you are a little too right wing, and perhaps antifa will burn your house occasionally.
Just imagine: They introduce the ID check, and then some kiked politician has the idea to extend it to "fight antisemitism" and every other politician agrees and cheers resoundingly. They LOVE their jewish masters, so they'll all agree immediately in droves.
The word "freedom" used to mean "free to pursue good" and that's how people used it when creating things like individual rights; governments can't stop you from, say, feeding the hungry or healing the sick (which they absolutely do today).
No one should be free to pursue evil; preventing that is exactly why we have laws in the first place.
Then you get into the moral relativistic question of what is good, who defines good, who defines good in 200 years, etc. I don't disagree with you, but it gets murky in a lot of places so it needs to be very well defined
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Pilpul, pilpul. Understand why pilpuling as an exercise of trying to redefine words and meanings. Pulling at the fabric of reality until nothing is left.
There is a reason Libertarians love debate. They don't have to get their hands dirty or break a sweat.
Thats where the very well defined part comes in. It needs to be rock solid, structured, sound, and complete or there will always be "debate". Fuck look at the 2nd ammendment they literally wrote it for a 5 year old and niggers are still debating it today.
Christianity, Fascism, blood nobility, Magna Carta. All solid rocks to anchor a world view. history is another. The role of swindlers, beggars, actors is convincing you that you are wrong. That the needs of the moment matter more than the weight of history.
It may be one of those situation where it's better to give up a right because others are abusing it.
It's no problem if I have a beer at the park while my kids play, but if it's allowed you can be sure there will be losers getting wasted and trashing the place.
Ultimately, the solution is racial homogenaity, but that could be a while.
On one hand, these jews can't push porn anymore if they pull out but that removes freedom of choice for adults. Gay.
On the other hand, requiring someone to give their identity to jews for blackmail is empowering them to control you. Gay.
On the third hand, needing a service for degen porn shit run by jews has already rotted your brain and wounded your concepts for real healthy relationships anyways. Gay.
Its overall good and I support it but it doesn't cross major privacy and freedom lines that shouldn't be crossed.
I see no downside.
Pornhub today, Communities.win tomorrow
Age verification is a Jew ADL tactic to BAN ANONYMOUS USERS
Banning anonymous Jew hate is the real goal
======
But I don’t trust any non-white government with these laws
**I** protect **my** people. My kids don't go looking for porn because I've made a point to mock it their entire lives; they know it exists but they also know it's "cringe".
It's not that hard.
By negation, I guess. Having a proven list of people who are degenerates intrinsically creates a list of people who are not degenerates… plus some degenerates who bypass the list. Those who debase themselves *should* be known. It *should* factor into one’s consideration of whether you’re going to engage in a particular vice. If we want to reclaim the very idea of “society,” we have to reinstate the internal, passive societal protections we had for millennia.
This is a wedge that allows government to later justify requiring ID for even more things. Youtube is already divided into "adult" and "kid" sections; will that require ID? What about Reddit and Communities? What about non-filtered search results? AI services?
It also puts a real logistical burden on websites which big corpos can absorb but which can prevent small sites from even getting started. Imagine if you want to make an un-Jewed search engine in your garage. Well, now you need to implement a government digital ID scheme which is more expensive and time consuming that the entire rest of the site.
Governments do not do things because it's morally right, ever.
The brains of addicts light up differently than those of non-addicts. It can be quantified and independently verified scientifically.
The problem with that is that if a group can coerce power to make undesired thoughts illegal you would have a police state like the Soviet union.
I think that if all of it was public - what kind of porn you watched, what forums you go to, who you vote for, where you shop, etc. If everyone who was racist was shown publicly there would be a lot more push back against this multicultural nonsense because regular fearful people would realize they ARENT ALONE. but. Then people are put in danger for their beliefs (us especially) if they are NOT the controlling group.
In Germany it would mean you say the holocaust is a hoax, you'll get reported and the police is knocking on your door, and get put in jail until you publicly admin the errors of your ways. In England you say perhaps they went a little overboard with immigration, and you get gang-raped by niggers in jail. In the US it's the banker jews that fuck you over (debanking) if you are a little too right wing, and perhaps antifa will burn your house occasionally.
Just imagine: They introduce the ID check, and then some kiked politician has the idea to extend it to "fight antisemitism" and every other politician agrees and cheers resoundingly. They LOVE their jewish masters, so they'll all agree immediately in droves.
I’m trying to be realistic. We’ll never kill the jews, so this won’t happen.
Whites should have the freedom to do good. Porn is not freedom in itself because it's a exploitive corruption of natural human urges.
No one should be free to pursue evil; preventing that is exactly why we have laws in the first place.
There is a reason Libertarians love debate. They don't have to get their hands dirty or break a sweat.
It's no problem if I have a beer at the park while my kids play, but if it's allowed you can be sure there will be losers getting wasted and trashing the place.
Ultimately, the solution is racial homogenaity, but that could be a while.