New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Te downside is a theoretical one of privacy and freedom. The upside is concrete in reduction of degeneracy. I support the move, but it does invite a discussion of "where does personal freedom end" and thats a slippery slope both ways
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
>theoretical one of privacy and freedom

By negation, I guess. Having a proven list of people who are degenerates intrinsically creates a list of people who are not degenerates… plus some degenerates who bypass the list. Those who debase themselves *should* be known. It *should* factor into one’s consideration of whether you’re going to engage in a particular vice. If we want to reclaim the very idea of “society,” we have to reinstate the internal, passive societal protections we had for millennia.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yeah, but who defines "vice"?

This is a wedge that allows government to later justify requiring ID for even more things. Youtube is already divided into "adult" and "kid" sections; will that require ID? What about Reddit and Communities? What about non-filtered search results? AI services?

It also puts a real logistical burden on websites which big corpos can absorb but which can prevent small sites from even getting started. Imagine if you want to make an un-Jewed search engine in your garage. Well, now you need to implement a government digital ID scheme which is more expensive and time consuming that the entire rest of the site.

Governments do not do things because it's morally right, ever.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
>Yeah, but who defines "vice”?

The brains of addicts light up differently than those of non-addicts. It can be quantified and independently verified scientifically.
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I agree, and I think that to be perfectly clear we would want that and everything else everyone does(not just porn) to be visible and transparent to EVERYONE else. If everything we said and did was public info people would be very different.

The problem with that is that if a group can coerce power to make undesired thoughts illegal you would have a police state like the Soviet union.

I think that if all of it was public - what kind of porn you watched, what forums you go to, who you vote for, where you shop, etc. If everyone who was racist was shown publicly there would be a lot more push back against this multicultural nonsense because regular fearful people would realize they ARENT ALONE. but. Then people are put in danger for their beliefs (us especially) if they are NOT the controlling group.
Toast message