I don't support government protecting me from anything, because they won't. There will still be all sorts of ways to get around it for kids while creating justification for mandatory digital ID.
**I** protect **my** people. My kids don't go looking for porn because I've made a point to mock it their entire lives; they know it exists but they also know it's "cringe".
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Te downside is a theoretical one of privacy and freedom. The upside is concrete in reduction of degeneracy. I support the move, but it does invite a discussion of "where does personal freedom end" and thats a slippery slope both ways
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
>theoretical one of privacy and freedom
By negation, I guess. Having a proven list of people who are degenerates intrinsically creates a list of people who are not degenerates… plus some degenerates who bypass the list. Those who debase themselves *should* be known. It *should* factor into one’s consideration of whether you’re going to engage in a particular vice. If we want to reclaim the very idea of “society,” we have to reinstate the internal, passive societal protections we had for millennia.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Yeah, but who defines "vice"?
This is a wedge that allows government to later justify requiring ID for even more things. Youtube is already divided into "adult" and "kid" sections; will that require ID? What about Reddit and Communities? What about non-filtered search results? AI services?
It also puts a real logistical burden on websites which big corpos can absorb but which can prevent small sites from even getting started. Imagine if you want to make an un-Jewed search engine in your garage. Well, now you need to implement a government digital ID scheme which is more expensive and time consuming that the entire rest of the site.
Governments do not do things because it's morally right, ever.
I agree, and I think that to be perfectly clear we would want that and everything else everyone does(not just porn) to be visible and transparent to EVERYONE else. If everything we said and did was public info people would be very different.
The problem with that is that if a group can coerce power to make undesired thoughts illegal you would have a police state like the Soviet union.
I think that if all of it was public - what kind of porn you watched, what forums you go to, who you vote for, where you shop, etc. If everyone who was racist was shown publicly there would be a lot more push back against this multicultural nonsense because regular fearful people would realize they ARENT ALONE. but. Then people are put in danger for their beliefs (us especially) if they are NOT the controlling group.
The problem is, what they are doing is used against dissidents like us. Just imagine there is something like an "internet pass" every person must have, and when registering one needs to show it. So all websites can directly report a person to the ZOG police for wrong-think.
In Germany it would mean you say the holocaust is a hoax, you'll get reported and the police is knocking on your door, and get put in jail until you publicly admin the errors of your ways. In England you say perhaps they went a little overboard with immigration, and you get gang-raped by niggers in jail. In the US it's the banker jews that fuck you over (debanking) if you are a little too right wing, and perhaps antifa will burn your house occasionally.
Just imagine: They introduce the ID check, and then some kiked politician has the idea to extend it to "fight antisemitism" and every other politician agrees and cheers resoundingly. They LOVE their jewish masters, so they'll all agree immediately in droves.
I see no downside.
Pornhub today, Communities.win tomorrow
Age verification is a Jew ADL tactic to BAN ANONYMOUS USERS
Banning anonymous Jew hate is the real goal
======
But I don’t trust any non-white government with these laws
**I** protect **my** people. My kids don't go looking for porn because I've made a point to mock it their entire lives; they know it exists but they also know it's "cringe".
It's not that hard.
By negation, I guess. Having a proven list of people who are degenerates intrinsically creates a list of people who are not degenerates… plus some degenerates who bypass the list. Those who debase themselves *should* be known. It *should* factor into one’s consideration of whether you’re going to engage in a particular vice. If we want to reclaim the very idea of “society,” we have to reinstate the internal, passive societal protections we had for millennia.
This is a wedge that allows government to later justify requiring ID for even more things. Youtube is already divided into "adult" and "kid" sections; will that require ID? What about Reddit and Communities? What about non-filtered search results? AI services?
It also puts a real logistical burden on websites which big corpos can absorb but which can prevent small sites from even getting started. Imagine if you want to make an un-Jewed search engine in your garage. Well, now you need to implement a government digital ID scheme which is more expensive and time consuming that the entire rest of the site.
Governments do not do things because it's morally right, ever.
The brains of addicts light up differently than those of non-addicts. It can be quantified and independently verified scientifically.
The problem with that is that if a group can coerce power to make undesired thoughts illegal you would have a police state like the Soviet union.
I think that if all of it was public - what kind of porn you watched, what forums you go to, who you vote for, where you shop, etc. If everyone who was racist was shown publicly there would be a lot more push back against this multicultural nonsense because regular fearful people would realize they ARENT ALONE. but. Then people are put in danger for their beliefs (us especially) if they are NOT the controlling group.
In Germany it would mean you say the holocaust is a hoax, you'll get reported and the police is knocking on your door, and get put in jail until you publicly admin the errors of your ways. In England you say perhaps they went a little overboard with immigration, and you get gang-raped by niggers in jail. In the US it's the banker jews that fuck you over (debanking) if you are a little too right wing, and perhaps antifa will burn your house occasionally.
Just imagine: They introduce the ID check, and then some kiked politician has the idea to extend it to "fight antisemitism" and every other politician agrees and cheers resoundingly. They LOVE their jewish masters, so they'll all agree immediately in droves.
I’m trying to be realistic. We’ll never kill the jews, so this won’t happen.