The word "freedom" used to mean "free to pursue good" and that's how people used it when creating things like individual rights; governments can't stop you from, say, feeding the hungry or healing the sick (which they absolutely do today).
No one should be free to pursue evil; preventing that is exactly why we have laws in the first place.
Then you get into the moral relativistic question of what is good, who defines good, who defines good in 200 years, etc. I don't disagree with you, but it gets murky in a lot of places so it needs to be very well defined
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Pilpul, pilpul. Understand why pilpuling as an exercise of trying to redefine words and meanings. Pulling at the fabric of reality until nothing is left.
There is a reason Libertarians love debate. They don't have to get their hands dirty or break a sweat.
Thats where the very well defined part comes in. It needs to be rock solid, structured, sound, and complete or there will always be "debate". Fuck look at the 2nd ammendment they literally wrote it for a 5 year old and niggers are still debating it today.
Christianity, Fascism, blood nobility, Magna Carta. All solid rocks to anchor a world view. history is another. The role of swindlers, beggars, actors is convincing you that you are wrong. That the needs of the moment matter more than the weight of history.
Yes they are all good rocks and they all address different aspects. Where the law comes into play they should be defined very well based on these things in a comprehensive manner and also not half ass the response. Why require id to use it if it's based in Christianity why not just outright ban that shit?
Whites should have the freedom to do good. Porn is not freedom in itself because it's a exploitive corruption of natural human urges.
No one should be free to pursue evil; preventing that is exactly why we have laws in the first place.
There is a reason Libertarians love debate. They don't have to get their hands dirty or break a sweat.