>what do national socialists think about communism
I wonder.
I wonder.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
47 comments:
I was working at a large corporation during covid, and the *only* thing that stopped them from doing a vax mandate for everybody at the company was the labor unions. Which is the only good thing I'll say about them. Now obviously I support workers organizing to ensure they aren't mistreated by their greedy (((capitalist overlords))), or just greedy corpos in general, but I do not think the current standing unions are the way to go. Because in general, unions are entirely in bed with the companies to begin with, and not representing the workers. Whenever they strike or try and "negotiate better contracts" for the workers, really they end up only holding out on issues that will make the union organizers richer and not the issues that actually help said workers. Additionally, they can inflate the price of everything because you can end up, like in the aircraft industry, in situations where the unions have gotten it to where lineworkers are being paid $50/hr just to turn a wrench, and take things *too far* towards the workers in their bid to enrich themselves.
Most (((capitalist overlords))) does a lot of union busting, subvert, bribe or in other ways sabotage any attempts workers make to organize against them. Looks like they're very successful in the US too.
Yep. The major unions that I've ever known anything about (railroad and aircraft) go basically hand-in-hand with the companies they are supposed to be fighting against, just trying to enrich themselves in the process. And they seriously slow everything down too. I know a guy who worked in the aircraft industry, and he had *loads* of union stories to tell. He told me one time that his shop had some piece of machinery that had some incredibly minor breakdown first thing in the morning, something that prevented the entire shop from working. So they had to wait 4 hours for a union mechanic to come and make some minor fix that they could have done themselves. But the union mechanic wasn't authorized to turn a *hand valve* to bring the gas flow back to the machine, so they had to wait *another* 4 hours for a union person who *was* authorized to turn the valve to come and turn it so their machine could get back up and running. They had a basketball goal set up behind the building so basically they just spent the entire day goofing off and playing basketball. And getting paid.
Sounds like very successful (((subversion))), I've heard many stories of inefficiency like that too. Tho in the opposite situation, a robot broke down and a nigger tried to fix it himself without knowledge. Something went wrong and the robot arm lifted up the nigger and crushed it against the floor. His pajeet colleges had no clue on what to do so they took a forklift and drove all the way to the restroom, picked up one of the engineers and drove him back to the robot, crying pls fix this, the spic engineer got scarred, screams waved his arms and ran away. It's a damn circus.
In civilized countries were things works and only White people with common sense and proper skills work, shit like that never happens thankfully. There's proper safety routines in place and everyone knows about it. New employees receive proper training before they start work and working conditions are kept to a high level to prevent a high rotation of the staff, most of the workers have worked in the same factory their whole life.
The more I hear, the happier I am living in a country that has functional non subverted unions.
In civilized countries were things works and only White people with common sense and proper skills work, shit like that never happens thankfully. There's proper safety routines in place and everyone knows about it. New employees receive proper training before they start work and working conditions are kept to a high level to prevent a high rotation of the staff, most of the workers have worked in the same factory their whole life.
The more I hear, the happier I am living in a country that has functional non subverted unions.
>In civilized countries were things works and only White people with common sense and proper skills work, shit like that never happens thankfully.
Sounds like a utopia...
Sounds like a utopia...
You just reminded me of that forklift safety video where a guy walks into a forklift and gets impaled by one of the tines. It was funny.
The German one is excellent, the fact that it's funny makes it easier for the stupid to pay attention. It's also great that they force everyone to watch it, including the janitor, the boss and the IT workers who may also occasionally walk around on the warehouse floor.
That said, niggers should not be allowed to operate a forklift under any circumstance. It's too dangerous.
That said, niggers should not be allowed to operate a forklift under any circumstance. It's too dangerous.
Unions are conspiracies against the customers. That's your right to do that.
I don't like to be told what to do by libcucks, so I'd never participate.
This is why unions can basically only exist in government and government-subsidized industries like autos and airplanes. The company with market rate workers will eat your lunch, the FedEx to your UPS. UPS is now subsidized by the government. They're *around*. But they suck.
I don't like to be told what to do by libcucks, so I'd never participate.
This is why unions can basically only exist in government and government-subsidized industries like autos and airplanes. The company with market rate workers will eat your lunch, the FedEx to your UPS. UPS is now subsidized by the government. They're *around*. But they suck.
It all adds up in the end, Americans are kept in the dark to not learn about how things works in more developed countries. Only one language, no history or culture from outside the US and repeat every day that everything that isn't American is communism.
(((They))) push fear, just like (((they))) did during WW2 when many Americans were deceived into believing that the Germans for absolutely no reason at all were gassing jews.
If the "union" is conspiring against you, and has libcucks telling you what to do it's not a legit union, but obviously some kind of (((scheme))) designed to scare you away from the whole idea of working together with your coworkers for better working conditions. The individualism makes each worker weak and disposable.
(((They))) push fear, just like (((they))) did during WW2 when many Americans were deceived into believing that the Germans for absolutely no reason at all were gassing jews.
If the "union" is conspiring against you, and has libcucks telling you what to do it's not a legit union, but obviously some kind of (((scheme))) designed to scare you away from the whole idea of working together with your coworkers for better working conditions. The individualism makes each worker weak and disposable.
Unions = communism
Good on paper, shit because it enables shitlords
Downvote me more, eurotrash. Your country and people are emasculated and useless.
Good on paper, shit because it enables shitlords
Downvote me more, eurotrash. Your country and people are emasculated and useless.
They are my best tool to live in an evil world. However a tool that enables me to live in an evil world but not remove the evil, is not a *good* tool.
I'd make that argument on nigger enabling infrastructure, which cost more for us law abiding citizens. It's also important to stay strong and survive, and if unions can help with that, then that's a good thing.
Look into any third world country, those poor fuckers earning less than $1/day is never gonna rise above paycheck-to-paycheck, they'll never stand a chance against eternal slavery. All of them disposable.
Look into any third world country, those poor fuckers earning less than $1/day is never gonna rise above paycheck-to-paycheck, they'll never stand a chance against eternal slavery. All of them disposable.
> rampant capitalism
Define this term, please. *You can’t.* It has none. It never has. It was invented by a communist to justify communist unions to ‘counter’ it.
Define this term, please. *You can’t.* It has none. It never has. It was invented by a communist to justify communist unions to ‘counter’ it.
judeo-capitalism. Even in the total absence of jews, there will still be jewlike people, greedy exploiters, who will finangle their way to the top.
It's mentioned in the Bible as well. Matthew 6:24:
> No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.
It's elaborated further in Matthew 6 about the failings of capitalism (the pursuit of money above all else), and how it's not in line with Christian doctrine:
> 25 “Therefore I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing? 26 Look at the birds of the air, for they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? 27 Which of you by worrying can add one cubit to his stature? 28 “So why do you worry about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin; 29 and yet I say to you that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30 Now if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will He not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? 31 “Therefore do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ 32 For after all these things the Gentiles seek. For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. 33 But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you. 34 Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.
Money isn't inherently evil, so long as it's used merely as a medium to exchange goods and services, to make bartering easier. However, capitalism results in the prioritization of money above all else, and will destroy itself, in one form or another, if not properly counterbalanced. This is why Jesus flew into such a rage at the money changers and merchants at the temple, who were selling goods and services at exorbitant prices, extorting the people (how many places can we list that are like that now?; fairs, sportsball stadiums, amusement parks, airports, etc.). Matthew 21:13:
> And He said to them, “It is written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer,’ but you have made it a ‘den of thieves.’ ”
Without (good) government intervention, we had (and have) monopolies and trusts, where the companies intentionally screw over their workers, hoarding more and more wealth into the hands of the very few at the top, using them as little more than slave labor. And for what? More money. This also results in the customers being screwed over, since the powerful companies, ruled by people who prize money over people (and truth), will replace healthy ingredients with poisoned ones, strong materials with weaker ones, high cost components with cheaper ones, building in obsolesce into their products, forcing people to buy their products over and over, for money, poisoning them over time, and giving them cheap products they can't hand down to their children. Whereas a good man, with love of his people, would build it right, the first time, with good ingredients and materials, and strive to build it better, because he loves his people more than money. Our governments used to clamp down on monopolies and trusts. Not any more. Through "lobbying" (a fancy word for bribes), companies bought out our own governments, and infiltrated them.
Capitalism, without controls, always, inevitably, downward spirals to its own destruction. I don't necessarily think that capitalism can't be rightly controlled, but it requires a people, at all levels, to prioritize the right things.
As you rightfully pointed out, there are numerous people, amongst even our own people, who are too enticed by greed, otherwise they wouldn't willing be working with satanic pedophiles who are actively working toward our destruction, merely so the greedy among us can get a temporary slice of the pie. In one form or another, proper controls on greed and money must be implemented, or it will death spiral.
> No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.
It's elaborated further in Matthew 6 about the failings of capitalism (the pursuit of money above all else), and how it's not in line with Christian doctrine:
> 25 “Therefore I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing? 26 Look at the birds of the air, for they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? 27 Which of you by worrying can add one cubit to his stature? 28 “So why do you worry about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin; 29 and yet I say to you that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30 Now if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will He not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? 31 “Therefore do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ 32 For after all these things the Gentiles seek. For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. 33 But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you. 34 Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.
Money isn't inherently evil, so long as it's used merely as a medium to exchange goods and services, to make bartering easier. However, capitalism results in the prioritization of money above all else, and will destroy itself, in one form or another, if not properly counterbalanced. This is why Jesus flew into such a rage at the money changers and merchants at the temple, who were selling goods and services at exorbitant prices, extorting the people (how many places can we list that are like that now?; fairs, sportsball stadiums, amusement parks, airports, etc.). Matthew 21:13:
> And He said to them, “It is written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer,’ but you have made it a ‘den of thieves.’ ”
Without (good) government intervention, we had (and have) monopolies and trusts, where the companies intentionally screw over their workers, hoarding more and more wealth into the hands of the very few at the top, using them as little more than slave labor. And for what? More money. This also results in the customers being screwed over, since the powerful companies, ruled by people who prize money over people (and truth), will replace healthy ingredients with poisoned ones, strong materials with weaker ones, high cost components with cheaper ones, building in obsolesce into their products, forcing people to buy their products over and over, for money, poisoning them over time, and giving them cheap products they can't hand down to their children. Whereas a good man, with love of his people, would build it right, the first time, with good ingredients and materials, and strive to build it better, because he loves his people more than money. Our governments used to clamp down on monopolies and trusts. Not any more. Through "lobbying" (a fancy word for bribes), companies bought out our own governments, and infiltrated them.
Capitalism, without controls, always, inevitably, downward spirals to its own destruction. I don't necessarily think that capitalism can't be rightly controlled, but it requires a people, at all levels, to prioritize the right things.
As you rightfully pointed out, there are numerous people, amongst even our own people, who are too enticed by greed, otherwise they wouldn't willing be working with satanic pedophiles who are actively working toward our destruction, merely so the greedy among us can get a temporary slice of the pie. In one form or another, proper controls on greed and money must be implemented, or it will death spiral.
It's a powerful tool when utilized correctly. (((They))) hate unions because few things are more dangerous to (((them))) than a large group of White people united and fighting for the same goals.
Without good unions you'll eventually end up with third world country level working conditions, no safety, no rights, and if you dare to complain you're instantly replaced by a pajeet.
Without good unions you'll eventually end up with third world country level working conditions, no safety, no rights, and if you dare to complain you're instantly replaced by a pajeet.
> (((They))) hate unions
They literally fucking created them. It’s a communist idea. They invented the fucking concept.
>because few things are more dangerous to (((them))) than a large group of White people united and fighting for the same goals.
Why can’t there be guilds for that? You know, what we had before communism conquered the world?
They literally fucking created them. It’s a communist idea. They invented the fucking concept.
>because few things are more dangerous to (((them))) than a large group of White people united and fighting for the same goals.
Why can’t there be guilds for that? You know, what we had before communism conquered the world?
>Why can’t there be guilds for that? You know, what we had before communism conquered the world?
^^The best solution.
^^The best solution.
> Why can’t there be guilds for that?
Outside America we still have that, tho in other languages than English the words have changed so nowadays we call them what would translate to unions in English, "laug" -> "union". By definition it's still guilds, sorry for the confusion.
What's the definition of a "union" in simplified English then? Because I've noticed something has gone terribly wrong in the US in everything related to workers rights, outsourcing, wages and workers safety.
Outside America we still have that, tho in other languages than English the words have changed so nowadays we call them what would translate to unions in English, "laug" -> "union". By definition it's still guilds, sorry for the confusion.
What's the definition of a "union" in simplified English then? Because I've noticed something has gone terribly wrong in the US in everything related to workers rights, outsourcing, wages and workers safety.
>What's the definition of a "union" in simplified English then?
A bunch of commies in industry get together with a bunch of commies in government and collude on how much gentiles get paid.
A bunch of commies in industry get together with a bunch of commies in government and collude on how much gentiles get paid.
Scandinavians have a history of labor unions and labor organization that is much different than in the USA. USA has shitty leftist unions and a ton of people that hate each other. It won't work well here.
And a history very similar to America as well in terms of the industrial revolution. I guess the big difference is that we don't have much negroes or immigrants so factories would have to use whatever workforce was available locally, while in the US every single worker was disposable due to the herds of niggers arriving every day looking for work.
That said, our railroad is as old as the US and attempts were made to bring in migrant workers, we just made sure to beat them up before they reached the factory and could steal our jobs.
That said, our railroad is as old as the US and attempts were made to bring in migrant workers, we just made sure to beat them up before they reached the factory and could steal our jobs.
Here is the metric of good vs. evil:
Good are things like health, wealth, power, wisdom, knowledge, children, etc....
Evil are things like sickness, poverty, weakness, illiteracy, ignorance, childlessness etc...
The question isn't whether unions are good and evil. Unions are not human. The question is whether you should join the union or not, as well as whether you should try to become a union leader, or perhaps form a union where none was before.
I think in the context of good and evil, the answer is obvious.
If the union will secure you more wealth and power and more children, then go for it. If not, then don't.
Good are things like health, wealth, power, wisdom, knowledge, children, etc....
Evil are things like sickness, poverty, weakness, illiteracy, ignorance, childlessness etc...
The question isn't whether unions are good and evil. Unions are not human. The question is whether you should join the union or not, as well as whether you should try to become a union leader, or perhaps form a union where none was before.
I think in the context of good and evil, the answer is obvious.
If the union will secure you more wealth and power and more children, then go for it. If not, then don't.
I am sure these folks are your friend
https://aflcio.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/92b26f4b-c3a5-43ed-a46f-a4d85ece0eb7.png
https://aflcio.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/92b26f4b-c3a5-43ed-a46f-a4d85ece0eb7.png
Absolutely not. Unions served a purpose, once, to establish certain standards of work life during a time when monopolies were common and travel was difficult. As SOON as they became a power system jews and opportunists converted them into a self serving lobby group. They make companies offer insurance only from the insurance they have stock in
The finance they have stock in
Etc.
They pay politicians to benefit themselves and use their workers dues to do it, mostly directly contradicting their members wishes and then lie about it.
Fuck a union.
The finance they have stock in
Etc.
They pay politicians to benefit themselves and use their workers dues to do it, mostly directly contradicting their members wishes and then lie about it.
Fuck a union.
A union is like any other organization: prone to being infiltrated and sabotaged by Marxist jews.
Is union good or bad? Depends on whether it is led by honorable White men or not.
I like to work as a free lance contractor. Our negotiations and terms are private. Usually just a hand shake and my reputation and if a new customer I have vetted them or they were recommended by another client I trust.
Is union good or bad? Depends on whether it is led by honorable White men or not.
I like to work as a free lance contractor. Our negotiations and terms are private. Usually just a hand shake and my reputation and if a new customer I have vetted them or they were recommended by another client I trust.
Busyness/business is always being reworked into a more time consuming and distracting version of itself and unions are another way to distract and cope with shit you weren't made for
Toast message
Unions were created by jews to create strife and conflict. Fuck jews and fuck unions.
Hitler and NSDAP also understood very well that a happy worker is a productive worker, but for NSDAP it was an ideological decision more than a financial one.
Calculating jews loves individualism and divided workers because they can bring in pajeets to replace you if you dare to complain about shitty working conditions. (((They))) also invest a lot in "union busting" to stop any attempt, using any method, were workers cooperate for better working conditions or to stop pajeets and niggers from replacing them.