The comments section is entertaining
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
30 comments:
I'm still suprised UnBiasedHistory didn't get his channel nuked for this
but then again, the same author literally [posted this crap](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSAdNFhWFdE) so maybe (((nepotism))) saved the dude's channel?
but then again, the same author literally [posted this crap](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSAdNFhWFdE) so maybe (((nepotism))) saved the dude's channel?
I don't get the video or the style.
Could you explain a bit what you mean by your comment?
Could you explain a bit what you mean by your comment?
the producer behind the channel is actually a Brazillian jew
hence why his this skit the [5 good emporers](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IU4qrriHrs) was never shoah'd despite [the Hadrian segment](https://youtu.be/0IU4qrriHrs?t=1207)
hence why his this skit the [5 good emporers](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IU4qrriHrs) was never shoah'd despite [the Hadrian segment](https://youtu.be/0IU4qrriHrs?t=1207)
I'm not familiar enough with ancient history so I can't tell if jokes are being made or it's actually accurate.
Your implication is the video wasn't taken down because he's a jew?
David Cole is a jew and 1/3 Of The holocaust would never survive on YouTube.
I apologize for my ignorance I'm obviously not understanding something.
Your implication is the video wasn't taken down because he's a jew?
David Cole is a jew and 1/3 Of The holocaust would never survive on YouTube.
I apologize for my ignorance I'm obviously not understanding something.
well his series is well made, i throughly recommend watching it but yeah, its made by a jew
not really a deteriment since i'm subscribed to several channels who i know they're jewish (like Ssethtzeentach and his cousin, Uberdanger that make gamey meme content with edgy humor [the racist kind])
though these days they are a lot more tamer than they used to be, esp with how fucking bad the jewtube ban-algorithm has become...
not really a deteriment since i'm subscribed to several channels who i know they're jewish (like Ssethtzeentach and his cousin, Uberdanger that make gamey meme content with edgy humor [the racist kind])
though these days they are a lot more tamer than they used to be, esp with how fucking bad the jewtube ban-algorithm has become...
Hadrian did nothing wrong.
The surviving jews were not deterred, looted temple gold for themselves, and established a foothold in Rome through bribes, and under the hood of a sect of judaism called Christianity. Roman suppression of Christians was just suppression of jews.
In contrast, Constantine and his Christian successors took great care to protect judaism and synagogues by law. Without Christianity, jews would not have found shelter anywhere.
The surviving jews were not deterred, looted temple gold for themselves, and established a foothold in Rome through bribes, and under the hood of a sect of judaism called Christianity. Roman suppression of Christians was just suppression of jews.
In contrast, Constantine and his Christian successors took great care to protect judaism and synagogues by law. Without Christianity, jews would not have found shelter anywhere.
> Roman suppression of Christians was just suppression of jews.
Except that the original uncoverted Jews were the ones who incited the Empire to crack down on Christianity in the first place. Otherwise the Romans at worst simply didnt care about Christianity when they first encountered it, and many willingly embraced it. The jews would never create a religion devoted to exposing themselves, their plans are intricate and overcomplicated, and sometime retarded, but never *that* retarded. And (((they))) didnt even exist at the time, their sect was created well after the destruction of Judea and the original Judahites.
Except that the original uncoverted Jews were the ones who incited the Empire to crack down on Christianity in the first place. Otherwise the Romans at worst simply didnt care about Christianity when they first encountered it, and many willingly embraced it. The jews would never create a religion devoted to exposing themselves, their plans are intricate and overcomplicated, and sometime retarded, but never *that* retarded. And (((they))) didnt even exist at the time, their sect was created well after the destruction of Judea and the original Judahites.
I could go on and on about this, but suffice it to say:
The Samaritans, who were descended from Joseph rather than Judah, told the Romans that they were cool with the Roman religion because it was congruent with their religion.
Jesus chose to reveal himself publicly to the woman at the well, a Samaritan whose husbands died and she remarried multiple times. In other words, he revealed himself to the least of the Josephites rather than the greatest of jews. She went and told her village of the news, and they accepted Jesus as the Messiah and Christ.
The reason why there was so much success at converting the Romans and Greeks from the very beginning was because their religion, and what we are told was their religion is simply not true, was congruent with the actual God in heaven. The jews, meanwhile, worshiped a corrupted form of religion with very strange teachings. Jesus famously told the pharisees "Didn't King David say 'Ye are gods!'" For this, they tried to put him to death.
Christianity is NOT based on judaism. Or rather, what the jews taught themselves in the first century has little to do with Christianity. Instead, the Romans and Greek philosophers were closer to the truth than they were.
The reason why so many people struggle with the Old Testament is because you are relying on the jews to interpret it for you. Throw their advice in the garbage, better yet, invert the advice. You'll see that the true nature of God isn't found in judaism or anything like it.
The only reason Jesus stuck around Judea was because he was prophesied to do so, and it was prophesied that they would reject him and bring upon themselves God's condemnation for perverting the word and murdering the servants and son of God.
The Samaritans, who were descended from Joseph rather than Judah, told the Romans that they were cool with the Roman religion because it was congruent with their religion.
Jesus chose to reveal himself publicly to the woman at the well, a Samaritan whose husbands died and she remarried multiple times. In other words, he revealed himself to the least of the Josephites rather than the greatest of jews. She went and told her village of the news, and they accepted Jesus as the Messiah and Christ.
The reason why there was so much success at converting the Romans and Greeks from the very beginning was because their religion, and what we are told was their religion is simply not true, was congruent with the actual God in heaven. The jews, meanwhile, worshiped a corrupted form of religion with very strange teachings. Jesus famously told the pharisees "Didn't King David say 'Ye are gods!'" For this, they tried to put him to death.
Christianity is NOT based on judaism. Or rather, what the jews taught themselves in the first century has little to do with Christianity. Instead, the Romans and Greek philosophers were closer to the truth than they were.
The reason why so many people struggle with the Old Testament is because you are relying on the jews to interpret it for you. Throw their advice in the garbage, better yet, invert the advice. You'll see that the true nature of God isn't found in judaism or anything like it.
The only reason Jesus stuck around Judea was because he was prophesied to do so, and it was prophesied that they would reject him and bring upon themselves God's condemnation for perverting the word and murdering the servants and son of God.
>Christianity is NOT based on judaism. Or rather, what the jews taught themselves in the first century has little to do with Christianity. Instead, the Romans and Greek philosophers were closer to the truth than they were.
I'd agree with you on this to some degree, because modern Kabalistic "judaism" is literally Antinomian Gnosticism, which was a satanic cult that originated around when Christ showed up and taught that the material universe itself was evil, and that God was evil for making it, and that there was a higher "god" above Him, and that the Law should be perverted and inverted wherever possible as an act of rebellion (which resulted in the Antinomian Gnostics being massive degenerates and self-absorbed sophists). Gnosticism as a whole basically died off (or at least seemed to) shortly after Christianity began to spread in earnest, but its abundantly clear some of the worse aforementioned Antinomian forms of it survived and were reborn as the mock-Judaism we know and hate today in Babylon, mixing in some of the legalistic practices of the Pharisees to create the Talmud. "Judaism" as a word didnt even exist until the late 14th-15th century, where it magically appeared in the English language to describe the Religion of the Talmud, though it wasnt until the Scolfield bible that it began to be fully conflated with the Nameless Religion of the Hebrews.
While many of the Pagans actually were worshipping devils masquerading as their ancestral heroes, some of them were approaching an understanding of God similar to the Ancient Hebrews thanks to philosophers like Plato and Plotinus developing a Monist understanding of God. This is probably why the jump to Christianity was so easy for many of them, the groundwork was already laid for them as you mentioned.
I'd agree with you on this to some degree, because modern Kabalistic "judaism" is literally Antinomian Gnosticism, which was a satanic cult that originated around when Christ showed up and taught that the material universe itself was evil, and that God was evil for making it, and that there was a higher "god" above Him, and that the Law should be perverted and inverted wherever possible as an act of rebellion (which resulted in the Antinomian Gnostics being massive degenerates and self-absorbed sophists). Gnosticism as a whole basically died off (or at least seemed to) shortly after Christianity began to spread in earnest, but its abundantly clear some of the worse aforementioned Antinomian forms of it survived and were reborn as the mock-Judaism we know and hate today in Babylon, mixing in some of the legalistic practices of the Pharisees to create the Talmud. "Judaism" as a word didnt even exist until the late 14th-15th century, where it magically appeared in the English language to describe the Religion of the Talmud, though it wasnt until the Scolfield bible that it began to be fully conflated with the Nameless Religion of the Hebrews.
While many of the Pagans actually were worshipping devils masquerading as their ancestral heroes, some of them were approaching an understanding of God similar to the Ancient Hebrews thanks to philosophers like Plato and Plotinus developing a Monist understanding of God. This is probably why the jump to Christianity was so easy for many of them, the groundwork was already laid for them as you mentioned.
You represented gnosticism as if Christ taught it. He did not. He emphatically DID NOT teach that the material universe was evil. In fact, quite the opposite! "Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven." He healed he sick, raised the dead, showing that being healthy and alive were very much good things.
> some of them were approaching an understanding of God ...
I believe the history of what the Greeks and Romans actually believed has been lost to history. Perhaps intentionally. Or perhaps because the Christians adopted it as one and the same, because it was one and the same.
Call the gods "saints" and I believe you get something resembling early Christianity, complete with resurrection and redemption.
Of note, the "pagans" rejected witchcraft (IE drugs and necrophilia) and they rejected anything that would destabilize society. They knew very much about the evils of eros and such and knew to avoid carnal passions, outside of certain constraints.
> some of them were approaching an understanding of God ...
I believe the history of what the Greeks and Romans actually believed has been lost to history. Perhaps intentionally. Or perhaps because the Christians adopted it as one and the same, because it was one and the same.
Call the gods "saints" and I believe you get something resembling early Christianity, complete with resurrection and redemption.
Of note, the "pagans" rejected witchcraft (IE drugs and necrophilia) and they rejected anything that would destabilize society. They knew very much about the evils of eros and such and knew to avoid carnal passions, outside of certain constraints.
You forgot the part where the Romans discovered human sacrifice in the temple at Jerusalem.
When Romans said "Not cool, stop that." the jews decided it was time to turn on their Roman protectors.
When Romans said "Not cool, stop that." the jews decided it was time to turn on their Roman protectors.
A thought just occurred to me. Why are we not producing art that depicts the Roman destruction of Judea? It is historical. There is no apparatus behind it to prevent people from praising Rome. Essentially all white people praise Rome. It's far more effective imagery than NS Germany. Germany was crushed, Rome crushed Judea.
Toast message
What did God say about Canaanites again?