He wanted to argue outside the context of Christianity.
So I told him to repent.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)4 children
I'm dumbfounded when Christians make absolute blanket statements of this nature. Paul, the greatest Christian evangelist who had the most cinematic "come to Jesus" moment of all time (if Acts is to be believed,) was a Jew.
The 12 disciples? Jews.
99% sure Jews are among the mass conversions also described in Acts.
Salvation is egalitarian in Christianity, which I don't even think is a bad thing, and when you flat out deny this fundamental aspect due to blind resentment, you look like a fool. And that's me talking. The perception is surely 10x as strong to anyone who isn't already redpilled and encounters this rhetoric.
There's just *one* tiny little problem with that claim that Jesus and the apostles were all jews...
https://files.catbox.moe/ykfrf8.png
Because the jews of today are not jews. They are "those who say they are jews but are not, and are of the synagogue of Satan". Jesus, Paul, and the Apostles were indeed the *Israelites* of the OT, but the international "jewish" satanic kikes of the modern day share nothing in common with them
Catbox links don't work for me on mobile for some reason .
I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites. It doesn't sound convincing to me at all but I haven't looked extensively into either side of it.
It's only tangential to my main point: Christian salvation is egalitarian. Anyone can be saved regardless of race. For God so loved the world, neither Jew nor Greek, God desires all to be saved, and so on. It's a commanding theme in the new testament, so it's jarring to see Christians deny this when their own scriptures condemn the notion at length.
Again, I'm not opposed to this. If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
And I believe right wing Christians should see it the same way. It's far better optically than saying all non whites go to hell automatically no matter what like a CI sperg. You can still be a nationalist and advocate for separation (for which there is also much biblical precedent) without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
The catbox link was just a picture from a jewish almanac where they are admitting that to liken a jew of today with a hebrew from Jesus' time is false.
>I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites.
I'm not saying we were. I'm simply saying that the genetic makeup of the Israelites was a *far* cry from what the kikes of today are. The kikes of today can claim little similarities with Jesus and His people. Even back then, I believe the pharisee class was, at the very least, a considerably more twisted version of the same race as the run-of-the-mill jewish people, if not a completely different race entirely just masking as the same.
>Anyone can be saved regardless of race.
Yes I agree with that. As much as I love CI's, I don't think they're theologically correct.
>If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
They shouldn't. It's just that there's considerably fewer of them. I see no reason why Whites; the Nation who has done more for the creation, proliferation, and spread of Christian doctrine than any other race on the planet, the Nation who Jesus was referring to when he told the jews that the Kingdom of Heaven would be taken from them and given to another Nation that would bear fruit, shouldn't be considered as Saint Peter was, the first among equals.
>without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
But the problem is, we've seen quite well what aggressively embracing universality does. We can admit to it, but still leave it on the down-low, so to speak.
Well sounds like we don't have the disagreement I have with the original commenter.
I do agree the over-fixation on the universalist themes is no good, and is the biggest problem with institutional Christianity today that makes it a social outreach program for zog. If the religion sticks around, ideally the balance will be struck, hopefully this time leaving no room for the errors that lead to our current predicament.
This was the sentiment applied to those Pharisees, and the Jews as a whole insofar as they refuse to abandon being Jews and become Christians. Surely you don't think this half baked gotcha undermines concrete, well known biblical examples of Jews who converted to Christianity?
it doesn't seem like you have a coherent point: "jews can repent, but the sentiment that they cannot repent because statistically speaking they practically never do is valid, but that sentiment is wrong and makes you look like a fool"
either we're allowed to make generalizations or we aren't. i'll gladly say "jews can't repent" and then congratulate Brother Nathanael for repenting in the same breath - i don't think i'm a hypocrite or doublethinking, i'm just generalizing and then recognizing an exception, which not only are separate events but ought be kept separate deliberately.
what you're doing when you rebuke us for that generalization is that you're taking the exception *as* the rule, which is a classic modern mistake best avoided. the more exceptional you keep exceptions, the better you defend your main point. if you don't do that, you risk aiding an enemy just in case he might be an exception.
I rescind my criticism if that's your position. Maybe it's just late stage autism, but when I read an absolute statement such as "X can't Y," I always take it at face value. I know a lot of Christians do hold that as a literal opinion as well which further muddies the water.
yeah, most people here are reasonable about it in the final analysis. there's some that do take a hard stance like you describe but i've faith that it's just their spirit getting the better of them when they feel they're among like-minded people and can state their opinions, and that in a real scenario if ever we stood to watch a jew *truly* repent they would be able to read the room and not pull out a luger and execute him.
it should be noted though that nowadays it's particularly difficult and extreme for a jew to repent. given that they are born into jewish institutions and ways of life, which are an injustice against nature from beginning to end, they have a lot to actively undo as adults. it's not enough to stop liking clipping coins and usury - they need to take up a life of pointing out how messed up their kin is to really prove they've understood the whole ordeal and are against it.
you'll see very many jews going "yeah, we're pieces of shit, what are you going to do about it?" and very few saying "yeah, we're pieces of shit, and i'd like to help you stop that somehow" because it's so damn hard to go against stuff hammered into you since birth even if you're consciously aware of it. look up the documentary "Defamation", it's on YouTube, and it shows how they basically traumatize and gaslight their own schoolchildren to get them to believe in the whole jewish worldview. it's no wonder most of them don't repent.
Imagine being so brainwashed by Jews that you think Jesus is a kike
Imagine being so brainwashed by Jews that you think Jesus’ gene pool could create a race of people arguing over whether or not it is morally correct to rape POWs to near-death
Paul was a pharisee, but he was also a proud Benjaminite (Romans 11:1). Israelites are Hebrews, neither of which have ANYTHING to do with today’s “Jews”
The 12 disciples? Jews.
99% sure Jews are among the mass conversions also described in Acts.
Salvation is egalitarian in Christianity, which I don't even think is a bad thing, and when you flat out deny this fundamental aspect due to blind resentment, you look like a fool. And that's me talking. The perception is surely 10x as strong to anyone who isn't already redpilled and encounters this rhetoric.
https://files.catbox.moe/ykfrf8.png
Because the jews of today are not jews. They are "those who say they are jews but are not, and are of the synagogue of Satan". Jesus, Paul, and the Apostles were indeed the *Israelites* of the OT, but the international "jewish" satanic kikes of the modern day share nothing in common with them
I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites. It doesn't sound convincing to me at all but I haven't looked extensively into either side of it.
It's only tangential to my main point: Christian salvation is egalitarian. Anyone can be saved regardless of race. For God so loved the world, neither Jew nor Greek, God desires all to be saved, and so on. It's a commanding theme in the new testament, so it's jarring to see Christians deny this when their own scriptures condemn the notion at length.
Again, I'm not opposed to this. If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
And I believe right wing Christians should see it the same way. It's far better optically than saying all non whites go to hell automatically no matter what like a CI sperg. You can still be a nationalist and advocate for separation (for which there is also much biblical precedent) without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
>I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites.
I'm not saying we were. I'm simply saying that the genetic makeup of the Israelites was a *far* cry from what the kikes of today are. The kikes of today can claim little similarities with Jesus and His people. Even back then, I believe the pharisee class was, at the very least, a considerably more twisted version of the same race as the run-of-the-mill jewish people, if not a completely different race entirely just masking as the same.
>Anyone can be saved regardless of race.
Yes I agree with that. As much as I love CI's, I don't think they're theologically correct.
>If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
They shouldn't. It's just that there's considerably fewer of them. I see no reason why Whites; the Nation who has done more for the creation, proliferation, and spread of Christian doctrine than any other race on the planet, the Nation who Jesus was referring to when he told the jews that the Kingdom of Heaven would be taken from them and given to another Nation that would bear fruit, shouldn't be considered as Saint Peter was, the first among equals.
>without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
But the problem is, we've seen quite well what aggressively embracing universality does. We can admit to it, but still leave it on the down-low, so to speak.
I do agree the over-fixation on the universalist themes is no good, and is the biggest problem with institutional Christianity today that makes it a social outreach program for zog. If the religion sticks around, ideally the balance will be struck, hopefully this time leaving no room for the errors that lead to our current predicament.
are you saying Jesus Christ looked like a fool when He told the pharisees that they belonged to their father, the devil?
...
...
*sigh*
No.
This was the sentiment applied to those Pharisees, and the Jews as a whole insofar as they refuse to abandon being Jews and become Christians. Surely you don't think this half baked gotcha undermines concrete, well known biblical examples of Jews who converted to Christianity?
either we're allowed to make generalizations or we aren't. i'll gladly say "jews can't repent" and then congratulate Brother Nathanael for repenting in the same breath - i don't think i'm a hypocrite or doublethinking, i'm just generalizing and then recognizing an exception, which not only are separate events but ought be kept separate deliberately.
what you're doing when you rebuke us for that generalization is that you're taking the exception *as* the rule, which is a classic modern mistake best avoided. the more exceptional you keep exceptions, the better you defend your main point. if you don't do that, you risk aiding an enemy just in case he might be an exception.
it should be noted though that nowadays it's particularly difficult and extreme for a jew to repent. given that they are born into jewish institutions and ways of life, which are an injustice against nature from beginning to end, they have a lot to actively undo as adults. it's not enough to stop liking clipping coins and usury - they need to take up a life of pointing out how messed up their kin is to really prove they've understood the whole ordeal and are against it.
you'll see very many jews going "yeah, we're pieces of shit, what are you going to do about it?" and very few saying "yeah, we're pieces of shit, and i'd like to help you stop that somehow" because it's so damn hard to go against stuff hammered into you since birth even if you're consciously aware of it. look up the documentary "Defamation", it's on YouTube, and it shows how they basically traumatize and gaslight their own schoolchildren to get them to believe in the whole jewish worldview. it's no wonder most of them don't repent.
Imagine being so brainwashed by Jews that you think Jesus’ gene pool could create a race of people arguing over whether or not it is morally correct to rape POWs to near-death
Paul was a pharisee, but he was also a proud Benjaminite (Romans 11:1). Israelites are Hebrews, neither of which have ANYTHING to do with today’s “Jews”