He wanted to argue outside the context of Christianity.
So I told him to repent.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
There's just *one* tiny little problem with that claim that Jesus and the apostles were all jews...
https://files.catbox.moe/ykfrf8.png
Because the jews of today are not jews. They are "those who say they are jews but are not, and are of the synagogue of Satan". Jesus, Paul, and the Apostles were indeed the *Israelites* of the OT, but the international "jewish" satanic kikes of the modern day share nothing in common with them
Catbox links don't work for me on mobile for some reason .
I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites. It doesn't sound convincing to me at all but I haven't looked extensively into either side of it.
It's only tangential to my main point: Christian salvation is egalitarian. Anyone can be saved regardless of race. For God so loved the world, neither Jew nor Greek, God desires all to be saved, and so on. It's a commanding theme in the new testament, so it's jarring to see Christians deny this when their own scriptures condemn the notion at length.
Again, I'm not opposed to this. If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
And I believe right wing Christians should see it the same way. It's far better optically than saying all non whites go to hell automatically no matter what like a CI sperg. You can still be a nationalist and advocate for separation (for which there is also much biblical precedent) without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
The catbox link was just a picture from a jewish almanac where they are admitting that to liken a jew of today with a hebrew from Jesus' time is false.
>I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites.
I'm not saying we were. I'm simply saying that the genetic makeup of the Israelites was a *far* cry from what the kikes of today are. The kikes of today can claim little similarities with Jesus and His people. Even back then, I believe the pharisee class was, at the very least, a considerably more twisted version of the same race as the run-of-the-mill jewish people, if not a completely different race entirely just masking as the same.
>Anyone can be saved regardless of race.
Yes I agree with that. As much as I love CI's, I don't think they're theologically correct.
>If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
They shouldn't. It's just that there's considerably fewer of them. I see no reason why Whites; the Nation who has done more for the creation, proliferation, and spread of Christian doctrine than any other race on the planet, the Nation who Jesus was referring to when he told the jews that the Kingdom of Heaven would be taken from them and given to another Nation that would bear fruit, shouldn't be considered as Saint Peter was, the first among equals.
>without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
But the problem is, we've seen quite well what aggressively embracing universality does. We can admit to it, but still leave it on the down-low, so to speak.
Well sounds like we don't have the disagreement I have with the original commenter.
I do agree the over-fixation on the universalist themes is no good, and is the biggest problem with institutional Christianity today that makes it a social outreach program for zog. If the religion sticks around, ideally the balance will be struck, hopefully this time leaving no room for the errors that lead to our current predicament.
https://files.catbox.moe/ykfrf8.png
Because the jews of today are not jews. They are "those who say they are jews but are not, and are of the synagogue of Satan". Jesus, Paul, and the Apostles were indeed the *Israelites* of the OT, but the international "jewish" satanic kikes of the modern day share nothing in common with them
I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites. It doesn't sound convincing to me at all but I haven't looked extensively into either side of it.
It's only tangential to my main point: Christian salvation is egalitarian. Anyone can be saved regardless of race. For God so loved the world, neither Jew nor Greek, God desires all to be saved, and so on. It's a commanding theme in the new testament, so it's jarring to see Christians deny this when their own scriptures condemn the notion at length.
Again, I'm not opposed to this. If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
And I believe right wing Christians should see it the same way. It's far better optically than saying all non whites go to hell automatically no matter what like a CI sperg. You can still be a nationalist and advocate for separation (for which there is also much biblical precedent) without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
>I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites.
I'm not saying we were. I'm simply saying that the genetic makeup of the Israelites was a *far* cry from what the kikes of today are. The kikes of today can claim little similarities with Jesus and His people. Even back then, I believe the pharisee class was, at the very least, a considerably more twisted version of the same race as the run-of-the-mill jewish people, if not a completely different race entirely just masking as the same.
>Anyone can be saved regardless of race.
Yes I agree with that. As much as I love CI's, I don't think they're theologically correct.
>If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
They shouldn't. It's just that there's considerably fewer of them. I see no reason why Whites; the Nation who has done more for the creation, proliferation, and spread of Christian doctrine than any other race on the planet, the Nation who Jesus was referring to when he told the jews that the Kingdom of Heaven would be taken from them and given to another Nation that would bear fruit, shouldn't be considered as Saint Peter was, the first among equals.
>without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
But the problem is, we've seen quite well what aggressively embracing universality does. We can admit to it, but still leave it on the down-low, so to speak.
I do agree the over-fixation on the universalist themes is no good, and is the biggest problem with institutional Christianity today that makes it a social outreach program for zog. If the religion sticks around, ideally the balance will be struck, hopefully this time leaving no room for the errors that lead to our current predicament.