Did you really think that's some "own"? He thinks you are a moron, to others it's rather cringe.
You could have used the opportunity to talk about that topic so that others can read it, instead you wasted it with that. It impresses nobody.
You could have called him a sodomite, call out his proclivity to be a depraved degenerate by the nature of his being (aka jew). You could have called him a faggot "of course a jew would find it ok, I bet you get it in the ass on a daily basis."
Muh' "repent." Oh come on...
You could have used the opportunity to talk about that topic so that others can read it, instead you wasted it with that. It impresses nobody.
You could have called him a sodomite, call out his proclivity to be a depraved degenerate by the nature of his being (aka jew). You could have called him a faggot "of course a jew would find it ok, I bet you get it in the ass on a daily basis."
Muh' "repent." Oh come on...
The 12 disciples? Jews.
99% sure Jews are among the mass conversions also described in Acts.
Salvation is egalitarian in Christianity, which I don't even think is a bad thing, and when you flat out deny this fundamental aspect due to blind resentment, you look like a fool. And that's me talking. The perception is surely 10x as strong to anyone who isn't already redpilled and encounters this rhetoric.
https://files.catbox.moe/ykfrf8.png
Because the jews of today are not jews. They are "those who say they are jews but are not, and are of the synagogue of Satan". Jesus, Paul, and the Apostles were indeed the *Israelites* of the OT, but the international "jewish" satanic kikes of the modern day share nothing in common with them
I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites. It doesn't sound convincing to me at all but I haven't looked extensively into either side of it.
It's only tangential to my main point: Christian salvation is egalitarian. Anyone can be saved regardless of race. For God so loved the world, neither Jew nor Greek, God desires all to be saved, and so on. It's a commanding theme in the new testament, so it's jarring to see Christians deny this when their own scriptures condemn the notion at length.
Again, I'm not opposed to this. If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
And I believe right wing Christians should see it the same way. It's far better optically than saying all non whites go to hell automatically no matter what like a CI sperg. You can still be a nationalist and advocate for separation (for which there is also much biblical precedent) without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
>I don't like to engage with the "we was" argument about the Israelites.
I'm not saying we were. I'm simply saying that the genetic makeup of the Israelites was a *far* cry from what the kikes of today are. The kikes of today can claim little similarities with Jesus and His people. Even back then, I believe the pharisee class was, at the very least, a considerably more twisted version of the same race as the run-of-the-mill jewish people, if not a completely different race entirely just masking as the same.
>Anyone can be saved regardless of race.
Yes I agree with that. As much as I love CI's, I don't think they're theologically correct.
>If there have been niggers or Jews that have lived genuinely honest, moral lives in spite of the overwhelming wickedness of their tribes, why shouldn't they go to heaven?
They shouldn't. It's just that there's considerably fewer of them. I see no reason why Whites; the Nation who has done more for the creation, proliferation, and spread of Christian doctrine than any other race on the planet, the Nation who Jesus was referring to when he told the jews that the Kingdom of Heaven would be taken from them and given to another Nation that would bear fruit, shouldn't be considered as Saint Peter was, the first among equals.
>without denying the universalist teachings in the scriptures.
But the problem is, we've seen quite well what aggressively embracing universality does. We can admit to it, but still leave it on the down-low, so to speak.
I do agree the over-fixation on the universalist themes is no good, and is the biggest problem with institutional Christianity today that makes it a social outreach program for zog. If the religion sticks around, ideally the balance will be struck, hopefully this time leaving no room for the errors that lead to our current predicament.
are you saying Jesus Christ looked like a fool when He told the pharisees that they belonged to their father, the devil?
...
...
*sigh*
No.
This was the sentiment applied to those Pharisees, and the Jews as a whole insofar as they refuse to abandon being Jews and become Christians. Surely you don't think this half baked gotcha undermines concrete, well known biblical examples of Jews who converted to Christianity?
either we're allowed to make generalizations or we aren't. i'll gladly say "jews can't repent" and then congratulate Brother Nathanael for repenting in the same breath - i don't think i'm a hypocrite or doublethinking, i'm just generalizing and then recognizing an exception, which not only are separate events but ought be kept separate deliberately.
what you're doing when you rebuke us for that generalization is that you're taking the exception *as* the rule, which is a classic modern mistake best avoided. the more exceptional you keep exceptions, the better you defend your main point. if you don't do that, you risk aiding an enemy just in case he might be an exception.
Imagine being so brainwashed by Jews that you think Jesus’ gene pool could create a race of people arguing over whether or not it is morally correct to rape POWs to near-death
Paul was a pharisee, but he was also a proud Benjaminite (Romans 11:1). Israelites are Hebrews, neither of which have ANYTHING to do with today’s “Jews”