political–economic systems:
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Authoritarianism already worked in european countries that are themselves rebellious. Spain, France, Britain (historically), and Italy to name a few. Really, Americans are not so rebellious. Why do Americans continue to accept these flagrant violations that have been occurring for over 100 years? It seems more like a LARP of being rebellious because of one revolution and one civil war, both of which were carried out by a different caliber of individuals than what we have today. American rebelliousness was axed by jews, pinkertons, and 3 letter agencies. It does not exist anymore.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Americans were rebellious until about the 1860s when the rebellious streak was genocided out of them by an aggressive highly centralized authoritarian regime, and then 2 back to back World wars shrunk the testosterone supply by quite a bit after that.
The ruling elites of the PIE were of the elite warrior class and they were very much not averse to exercising their authority. Hitherto, people are naturally authoritarian by nature. Whether it's centralized authority like France or decentralized authority like the HRE, someone has dictatorial power somewhere in every situation. If someone doesn't have authority, outside actors will gain that authority (see modern democracy where now we have jews in dictatorial roles).
And everyone wants their personalized dictator to rule for life. Will MIGA-tards be happy to "honor the due process of democracy and the transfer of power" in however long when the next president comes into office (assuming he doesn't have a stroke and die first)? Fuck no. Has anyone actually thought this? No. Not really. Unless their leader is someone they don't like, then they'll support their transfer of power to the next.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Not necessarily, but it can be. It could also be a very free state.
Also, that dress that woman is wearing. Fascism didn't create that. That is Bavarian ethnic cultural dress developed under a noble dynasty in the 17th century.
Blue jeans are quite literally a jewish invention which is why everyone should boycott them. Levi Straus & Co is a jewish company founded by jews. The modern company donates millions of dollars to anti-American and anti-Christian causes every year.
Calvin Klein was a literal faggot.
We have to be careful of things we consume. If you must buy blue jeans, buy Wrangler or some other brand. Wrangler is probably judiaized now for all I know. I prefer breechcloth and buckskin leggings, which is the Real American tradition.
Anyways... I don't think these old labels serve us anymore. I prefer the terms "good guys" and "bad guys."
If you're not a good guy, then you are a bad guy.
I will judge everyone on a sliding scale based on efforts made to achieve a higher, loftier metaphysical, spiritual, and material goal, the goal of the "right wing" or a goal of Liberty (not to be confused with freedom), a goal of preserving the Aryan Race, which is the only race capable of achieving Liberty. In that regard, I consider Hitler was a good guy, as he was defending his people from the jews. And he left behind some good ideas and bad ideas, but his good ideas were really good.