New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
36
political–economic systems: (media.scored.co)
posted 2 months ago by Uncle_Adolf on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +36Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
devotech2 on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
A small kingdom with a strong monarchy is still an authoritarian state, just a small one. Medieval France, a classic example of the centralized authoritarian state and arguably the original one after the romans, was as authoritarian as the average client state of the HRE. Decentralization =/= a lack of authoritarianism and centralization =/= authoritarianism either. Spain was also decentralized until the bourbons, but the viceroys absolutely had plenty of dictatorial power over their viceroyalities.

The ruling elites of the PIE were of the elite warrior class and they were very much not averse to exercising their authority. Hitherto, people are naturally authoritarian by nature. Whether it's centralized authority like France or decentralized authority like the HRE, someone has dictatorial power somewhere in every situation. If someone doesn't have authority, outside actors will gain that authority (see modern democracy where now we have jews in dictatorial roles).

And everyone wants their personalized dictator to rule for life. Will MIGA-tards be happy to "honor the due process of democracy and the transfer of power" in however long when the next president comes into office (assuming he doesn't have a stroke and die first)? Fuck no. Has anyone actually thought this? No. Not really. Unless their leader is someone they don't like, then they'll support their transfer of power to the next.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
deleted 2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Toast message