New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
36
political–economic systems: (media.scored.co)
posted 2 months ago by Uncle_Adolf on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +36Score on mirror )
9 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You must log in or sign up to comment
9 comments:
2
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
Lies. Communists arent fat. They dont have any food.

Commie LARPERS in a capitalist society are fat.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
5
Uncle_Adolf on scored.co
2 months ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
Gay race communism is the modern version of Bolshevik communinsm.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
its actually ridiculously easy to be obese on corn syrup, which in America is cheaper than water
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Yes corn syrup is a killer
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
deleted 2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Mirrored from scored.co
4
devotech2 on scored.co
2 months ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Everyone is receptive to authoritarianism because it's in human nature. Democrats and Republicans both want their candidates to have supreme power but won't admit it. Everyone is all for due-process and democracy until it's someone they like.

Authoritarianism already worked in european countries that are themselves rebellious. Spain, France, Britain (historically), and Italy to name a few. Really, Americans are not so rebellious. Why do Americans continue to accept these flagrant violations that have been occurring for over 100 years? It seems more like a LARP of being rebellious because of one revolution and one civil war, both of which were carried out by a different caliber of individuals than what we have today. American rebelliousness was axed by jews, pinkertons, and 3 letter agencies. It does not exist anymore.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
deleted 2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Mirrored from scored.co
1
devotech2 on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
A small kingdom with a strong monarchy is still an authoritarian state, just a small one. Medieval France, a classic example of the centralized authoritarian state and arguably the original one after the romans, was as authoritarian as the average client state of the HRE. Decentralization =/= a lack of authoritarianism and centralization =/= authoritarianism either. Spain was also decentralized until the bourbons, but the viceroys absolutely had plenty of dictatorial power over their viceroyalities.

The ruling elites of the PIE were of the elite warrior class and they were very much not averse to exercising their authority. Hitherto, people are naturally authoritarian by nature. Whether it's centralized authority like France or decentralized authority like the HRE, someone has dictatorial power somewhere in every situation. If someone doesn't have authority, outside actors will gain that authority (see modern democracy where now we have jews in dictatorial roles).

And everyone wants their personalized dictator to rule for life. Will MIGA-tards be happy to "honor the due process of democracy and the transfer of power" in however long when the next president comes into office (assuming he doesn't have a stroke and die first)? Fuck no. Has anyone actually thought this? No. Not really. Unless their leader is someone they don't like, then they'll support their transfer of power to the next.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
deleted 2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message