Consume Product

Anglo is a shorthand for "English", term which itself omits any connection to the saxons. The angles were culturally dominant over the saxons, both were culturally dominant over the jutes and frisians. England is the "land of angles", no mention of the saxons. Although, ironically, England exists as a unified country with the name "England" because of the very much saxon-founded Wessex. I think it's largely just because the angles had a name with a prefix that's easier to use than the saxons did. And by that point they were already well integrated with each other anyways. It's kind of similar to how almost everything relating to Spain has a connection to Castilla rather than Aragón despite the fact that spain is both of these.

But anyways, "anglo" isn't a false term to use for someone who is english or of English descent. Nor is it necessarily false to call countries that were predominantly founded and settled by English people and which have English customs, such as America or Australia, "anglo" either. Like how Hispanic can be used for spain (although rare, it qualifies as Hispanic) or Mexico or Argentina all the same despite the fact that these countries have little in common apart from being culturally descended from Castilla ultimately (and Castilla is virtually synonymous with spain)

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed