New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
>Well, for one thing, he didn’t do the holocaust. He could have and he should have, but he didn’t because he was a Jew-loving faggot. Secondly, he refused to kill Anglos, despite also having the ability to kill them in vast quantities. Instead of killing Jews and Anglos, like an intelligent person would have, Hitler just killed millions of Russians and Germans, which benefited Britain and the USA. He was one of the biggest dipshits in history, honestly.

- comment from https://www.unz.com/article/whats-wrong-with-hitler

Lol
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
7 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
It's a problem in that it focuses on language (culture) alone and completely ignores race, which is at least as important.

It's also worth noting that the aristocracy is heavily Norman (French Norsemen) on top of all the other ethnicities.

I don't mind using a term that doesn't explicitely mention Saxons, but I don't like Anglo just because of it's ambiguity, especially when talking about the "Anglo-sphere" (not unlike the use of Hispanic to mean metizos).
devotech2 on scored.co
7 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The difference is that the "anglosphere" was almost entirely *actually* anglo (with the exception of the very large numbers of not-anglo white Americans) for many years. Only some countries in the hispanosphere can be properly called "hispanic" by race, although even the white Hispanic countries that aren't spain have very large Italian descended communities in particular, along with germans. In some cases outnumbering the white spanish communities there. Although even there you have a selection bias towards more "exotic" European ethnicities than Spaniards, like how Americans underreport english ancestry. So the actual number of Spaniards is hard to say.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Toast message