From what I've researched, the factors that contribute to hatred for Nick Fuentes most in the WigNat sphere include the following:
- He's not a racially pure White
- He doesn't exclusively associate with racially pure Whites
- He's Roman Catholic instead of Pagan Norse, Greek, Roman God worshipper
- His aesthetic is Northern City rather than Southern Trad
- He's not married and makes fun of wife guys frequently
Did I miss any?
(Please don't say some variation of gay, spic, mutt, etc., etc. I don't care if you hate him, but if this is how you express your hatred, your IQ is clearly below 80 and I will block you.)
Thought Experiment: Post in the comments if you know anyone with just about similar motion and media presence who meets at least one of these criteria.
It started as him saying there is low evidence, and when you have Charlie Kirk being the goodest goy, and the people justifying the Israel theory are saying some retarded shit like trapdoors, I'm not going to immediately blame Isarel for something they have very low motive to be responsible for.
"Oh, but we have to blame Israel for everything, even when it doesn't make any sense."
No, I think being retarded is a luxury only the powerful get to have, and we have to be more intellectually rigorous to demonstrate to the public that we're not wackjobs.
> He calls people "low-IQ anti-semites", which is subversion of those who notice the jew. As such he runs defence for various jewish atrocities.
Or maybe he's trying to keep anti-semitic sphere from being polluted by idiots, wackjobs, and subversives who propagate nonsensical conspiracy theories to scare away normal intellectual people from the topic.
> He is busy with trashtalking right-wingers more than anything else, which is further subversive behavior.
A lot of rightwingers are subversives. Trash-talking left wingers doesn't achieve much if your own side screws you over whenever they get power.
> He may call out israel and zionism, but he ignores the topic of the jew itself entirely. Neither does he focus on the last century, nor the past 2 millennia. His knowledge about israel may be profound, but it seems like that's the height of his unique knowledge.
This is the complete opposite case. If anything, he's one of the few people who go past Israel/Zionism and target Jews directly.
One example is how he calls out the International Jewish Congress and also states that left-wingers only oppose Israel insofar as they see it as an extension of White Supremacy, rather than Jewish Supremacy.
> The reason nobody wrote here is because you present yourself like an absolute faggot. Like anyone cares if you "block" them. Nick Fuentes has a low popularity here, so apathy about him is another reason.
I would rather present myself like an "absolute faggot" than have yet another retarded boomer comment "cat boy nigger spic" for the umpteenmillioneth time.
And it seems that people do care enough not to write here if that's all they have to offer, so it worked.
As written in my other comment, it makes absolute sense.
> and we have to be more intellectually rigorous to demonstrate to the public that we're not wackjobs.
Fine, so then ignore the kooky bullshit and focus on what I said instead. There are YouTubers who do as well, and they do well.
> who propagate nonsensical conspiracy theories
Yet he ignores the reasonable theories. By focusing on the kooky stuff, he derails the conversation entirely. It entirely occupies the conversation. It's essentially like a straw man - so it's either stupidity, bad faith behavior, or arrogance.
If he'd have integrity, he'd focus on the actually feasible theories (and evidence) and address that. Instead he grabs the most ridiculous bullshit and the topic is over.
> Trash-talking left wingers doesn't achieve much if your own side screws you over whenever they get power.
What power? You mean the cuckservative zionists like Trump? That is not "we." Conservatives are feckless, toothless idiots, and many are tired of them. Just look how Trump (and his people) covered up the Epstein files, even though revealing it is what he advertised in his election campaigns. How many got arrested over it? 2 maximum. The utterly rotten corrupt pedophiles are still in charge as if nothing happened. As a note, it wasn't a blackmail operation, it was a reward system to hand child sex slaves to PROVEN TRAITORS.
It is time to level up the way right-wingers treat leftists, because leftists are utterly depraved and dumb. Their very ideology has severe logical flaws. They champion Arabs, but Arabs HATE faggotry and feminism. They champion "anti-racism", but every race except Whites is inherently racist (rightfully so). They champion the "working class", but working class people consider them delusional clowns.
> One example is how he calls out the International Jewish Congress and also states that left-wingers only oppose Israel insofar as they see it as an extension of White Supremacy, rather than Jewish Supremacy.
Which is still timid and inconsequential. What about "jews spearheaded feminism, communism, Transatlantic Slave Trade"? Or jews declared an international war against Germany in 1933, and then suddenly 1939 Poland massacred Germans in occupied Danzig, which forced Hitler's hand, and then oh wonder, World War II was there. And then France and Britain declared war on Germany (as was planned), but not on the Soviet Union (which was NOT planned).
> And it seems that people do care enough not to write here if that's all they have to offer, so it worked.
Are you conflating the concept of apathy? Not caring -> not writing here. I personally consider it an interesting topic though.
It took me one day to create a valid theory. Charlie Kirk was the golden zionist shabbos boy, raking in jewish donor moneys to an extreme degree. And then he started to turn on them, to publicly question them, to call out israel for genociding, for insisting on revealing the Epstein operation, to refuse their invitations.
So while you could say he was just one of many who oppose israel, he had a following of millions of conservatives. So if a former zionist turns around and starts to oppose israel, it's a major issue, from the perspective of the jews a massive and dangerous betrayal. So they killed him while was widely known as the golden zionist shabbos boy, capitalizing on that and removing a major threat to their propaganda.
And the evidence is also striking. While it came up over time, there are massive issues with blaming that child. There was that *known* jew who distracted the police with his pedophile crap and claimed to be the shooter. Netanyahu posted ~20 minutes before any media reported Kirk's death, with a text that took 5-10 minutes at least to write.
The kooky stuff is irrelevant. But even then, how didn't the bullet pass through his neck, which it should have *easily* penetrated? And how comes his bitch of a wife happily struts around and takes over the company? Who also has a shady past, and seems to be handed to Kirk through his jewish connections in the past?
Anyway, there is plenty of reason to question the official narrative, and to derail it by claiming there are kooky idiocy, therefore it's all disproven is nonsensical.
[My Charlie Kirk theory](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1AR0LQZHxw/about-the-charlie-kirk-situation/c)
[Why scientifically speaking niggers are not of the species of "humans"](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZL5tIs/science-niggers-are-not-humans/c)
[About jews - all these mysterious Soviet Spies in the US were jewish communists](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/17txy1v9Sz/soviet-spies/c) - a thick Russian accent would have been a dead giveaway, but they were all communist jewish traitors all along.
[This](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARK54TJi4/what-really-happened-since-the-e/c) is what happened after WWI, and the reason is that Hitler overthrew their [finance system](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARcz4VFDk/the-jewish-finance-system-and-wh/c), which is the most important thing for them. And [this](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARdVyr2JU/the-jews-used-poland-to-provoke-/c) is what triggered WWII - not such poor victims, were they? As if Poland, Britain, France, Soviet Union and the US just wanted peace, and Germany just thought "hey guys, what if we'd conquer the WORLD?"