New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
From what I've researched, the factors that contribute to hatred for Nick Fuentes most in the WigNat sphere include the following:

- He's not a racially pure White
- He doesn't exclusively associate with racially pure Whites
- He's Roman Catholic instead of Pagan Norse, Greek, Roman God worshipper
- His aesthetic is Northern City rather than Southern Trad
- He's not married and makes fun of wife guys frequently

Did I miss any?

(Please don't say some variation of gay, spic, mutt, etc., etc. I don't care if you hate him, but if this is how you express your hatred, your IQ is clearly below 80 and I will block you.)

Thought Experiment: Post in the comments if you know anyone with just about similar motion and media presence who meets at least one of these criteria.
You must log in or sign up to comment
30 comments:
12
derjudenjager on scored.co
22 hours ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 1 child
Hangs out with trannies

Supports shit mixing

Had sexual relations with a troon

Do i need to keep going
goyberg on scored.co
21 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
- Erm, excuse me chud, source??? 🤓
- I assume you mean looksmaxxing. I'll add this one to the list.
- Unsubstantiated and falls in line with "some variation of gay, spic, mutt, etc., etc"
derjudenjager on scored.co
15 hours ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
You must be new. 🆕
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 hour ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> I assume you mean looksmaxxing

I don't see how you could possibly conclude that. Is it the race mixing or the tranny degeneracy? Looksmaxxing is a degenerate trend btw, which Fuentes doesn't even care about btw.
10
steele2 on scored.co
21 hours ago 10 points (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror )
* He's a butt-munching homo for cat-rent-boys

* He says, "not every jew" and pretends most kikes are good people.

* His homosexuality is blatant with his soft speaking and soft mannerisms. It turns my stomach.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
20 hours ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
>if this is how you express your hatred, your IQ is clearly below 80 and I will block you

Why are you gay?
DwydeShrude on scored.co
20 hours ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 3 children
fuentes is just a big talking edgelord for clicks with no genuine ethos. I think he's a fake Catholic as he doesn't seem to live any virtues of the religion. His plan for zoomers to infiltrate institutions and takeover in 15 years is such a stupid control-operation that it's irritating to have to mention it. Overall, he's obviously very smart but offers nothing of substance.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
20 hours ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
My policy on these "influencers" has been, for years: "if they aren't saying anything further right of what we're seeing here on KIA2, they're larping for clicks".

I have *never* heard Fuentes say anything that I hadn't heard before. No original thoughts or takes, just repeating what we've been dicussing for half a decade but acting like he himself thought it up.

He may be "spreading the message" but he wasn't able to figure it out himself and he probably doesn't even underatand it.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 hour ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
> His plan for zoomers to infiltrate institutions and takeover in 15 years

Oh yes, totally forgot about that. To suggest that is utterly naive and dumb.

Because in order to occupy the positions they do, one needs to embody a mindset and lifestyle that fits it. What, so these people dress like depraved faggots and are parasites until the right moment comes where they go mask-off and reveal that they are actually based?

Or they go fuck children on some pedophile ring operation which they get as reward for PROVEN TREASON? And then suddenly they just shed all of their treason and crimes and become based?

> Overall, he's obviously very smart but offers nothing of substance.

The latter is clearly true, the former is highly questionable. If that is considered smart, the bar must be very low. He is eloquent though... but that's his highest skill: To be a talker.
Goyslopentologist on scored.co
4 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I don't think it matters. When he was new, everyone was afraid to talk about nigs and jews, but he laid it out with his witty and quick commenting, and it sticks with gen z. People know him, what he says, and how he says it.

This broke the ice and many of his followers and you guys here went on X. This spread like a wildfire, great progress has been made since 2022.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 hour ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
That is true, and I agree on that. Fuentes is just an Overton shift, but he isn't the person who is the goal.
Knight_Of_Saint_John on scored.co
20 hours ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
He is an unrepentant homosexual
Hullohoomans on scored.co
17 hours ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
No, we hate him cuz he's a duplicitous, degenerate faggot.
PurestEvil on scored.co
22 hours ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
> He's not a racially pure White

He is White enough.

> He doesn't exclusively associate with racially pure Whites

Not much relevant. It's a little annoying, however as long as those he associates with are decent and based, it's tolerable. But he was friends with Sneako for example, who is some Arab trash who has *some* good takes about jews. But ultimately, just as Hassan, the communist who wears Mao Zedong regalia as fashion, they both champion islam, brownoids and hate jews because of israel.

> He's Roman Catholic instead of Pagan Norse, Greek, Roman God worshipper

Irrelevant.

> His aesthetic is Northern City rather than Southern Trad

Irrelevant.

> He's not married and makes fun of wife guys frequently

That's just some (edgy) opinion. Irrelevant.

> Did I miss any?

Yes, there are significant issues with him, which is why there was a time where I grew to listen to him a bit to now being annoyed by him.

1. He staunchly opposes the idea that israel killed Charlie Kirk, and called people who believe that to be intellectually deficient. And somehow, even though they were effectively political enemies, he cannot stop championing Charlie Kirk.

2. He calls people "low-IQ anti-semites", which is subversion of those who notice the jew. As such he runs defence for various jewish atrocities.

3. He is busy with trashtalking right-wingers more than anything else, which is further subversive behavior.

4. He may call out israel and zionism, but he ignores the topic of the jew itself entirely. Neither does he focus on the last century, nor the past 2 millennia. His knowledge about israel may be profound, but it seems like that's the height of his unique knowledge.

He is neither as smart as he thinks he is, nor has much integrity. At best he is a stepping stone for people who gravitate towards the right and learn about the jew (through israel and zionists).

> and I will block you.

The reason nobody wrote here is because you present yourself like an absolute faggot. Like anyone cares if you "block" them. Nick Fuentes has a low popularity here, so apathy about him is another reason.
goyberg on scored.co
21 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 3 children
> He staunchly opposes the idea that israel killed Charlie Kirk, and called people who believe that to be intellectually deficient. And somehow, even though they were effectively political enemies, he cannot stop championing Charlie Kirk.

It started as him saying there is low evidence, and when you have Charlie Kirk being the goodest goy, and the people justifying the Israel theory are saying some retarded shit like trapdoors, I'm not going to immediately blame Isarel for something they have very low motive to be responsible for.

"Oh, but we have to blame Israel for everything, even when it doesn't make any sense."

No, I think being retarded is a luxury only the powerful get to have, and we have to be more intellectually rigorous to demonstrate to the public that we're not wackjobs.

> He calls people "low-IQ anti-semites", which is subversion of those who notice the jew. As such he runs defence for various jewish atrocities.

Or maybe he's trying to keep anti-semitic sphere from being polluted by idiots, wackjobs, and subversives who propagate nonsensical conspiracy theories to scare away normal intellectual people from the topic.

> He is busy with trashtalking right-wingers more than anything else, which is further subversive behavior.

A lot of rightwingers are subversives. Trash-talking left wingers doesn't achieve much if your own side screws you over whenever they get power.

> He may call out israel and zionism, but he ignores the topic of the jew itself entirely. Neither does he focus on the last century, nor the past 2 millennia. His knowledge about israel may be profound, but it seems like that's the height of his unique knowledge.

This is the complete opposite case. If anything, he's one of the few people who go past Israel/Zionism and target Jews directly.

One example is how he calls out the International Jewish Congress and also states that left-wingers only oppose Israel insofar as they see it as an extension of White Supremacy, rather than Jewish Supremacy.

> The reason nobody wrote here is because you present yourself like an absolute faggot. Like anyone cares if you "block" them. Nick Fuentes has a low popularity here, so apathy about him is another reason.

I would rather present myself like an "absolute faggot" than have yet another retarded boomer comment "cat boy nigger spic" for the umpteenmillioneth time.

And it seems that people do care enough not to write here if that's all they have to offer, so it worked.
PurestEvil on scored.co
20 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
> "Oh, but we have to blame Israel for everything, even when it doesn't make any sense."

As written in my other comment, it makes absolute sense.

> and we have to be more intellectually rigorous to demonstrate to the public that we're not wackjobs.

Fine, so then ignore the kooky bullshit and focus on what I said instead. There are YouTubers who do as well, and they do well.

> who propagate nonsensical conspiracy theories

Yet he ignores the reasonable theories. By focusing on the kooky stuff, he derails the conversation entirely. It entirely occupies the conversation. It's essentially like a straw man - so it's either stupidity, bad faith behavior, or arrogance.

If he'd have integrity, he'd focus on the actually feasible theories (and evidence) and address that. Instead he grabs the most ridiculous bullshit and the topic is over.

> Trash-talking left wingers doesn't achieve much if your own side screws you over whenever they get power.

What power? You mean the cuckservative zionists like Trump? That is not "we." Conservatives are feckless, toothless idiots, and many are tired of them. Just look how Trump (and his people) covered up the Epstein files, even though revealing it is what he advertised in his election campaigns. How many got arrested over it? 2 maximum. The utterly rotten corrupt pedophiles are still in charge as if nothing happened. As a note, it wasn't a blackmail operation, it was a reward system to hand child sex slaves to PROVEN TRAITORS.

It is time to level up the way right-wingers treat leftists, because leftists are utterly depraved and dumb. Their very ideology has severe logical flaws. They champion Arabs, but Arabs HATE faggotry and feminism. They champion "anti-racism", but every race except Whites is inherently racist (rightfully so). They champion the "working class", but working class people consider them delusional clowns.

> One example is how he calls out the International Jewish Congress and also states that left-wingers only oppose Israel insofar as they see it as an extension of White Supremacy, rather than Jewish Supremacy.

Which is still timid and inconsequential. What about "jews spearheaded feminism, communism, Transatlantic Slave Trade"? Or jews declared an international war against Germany in 1933, and then suddenly 1939 Poland massacred Germans in occupied Danzig, which forced Hitler's hand, and then oh wonder, World War II was there. And then France and Britain declared war on Germany (as was planned), but not on the Soviet Union (which was NOT planned).

> And it seems that people do care enough not to write here if that's all they have to offer, so it worked.

Are you conflating the concept of apathy? Not caring -> not writing here. I personally consider it an interesting topic though.
PurestEvil on scored.co
21 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
> and the people justifying the Israel theory are saying some retarded shit like trapdoors

It took me one day to create a valid theory. Charlie Kirk was the golden zionist shabbos boy, raking in jewish donor moneys to an extreme degree. And then he started to turn on them, to publicly question them, to call out israel for genociding, for insisting on revealing the Epstein operation, to refuse their invitations.

So while you could say he was just one of many who oppose israel, he had a following of millions of conservatives. So if a former zionist turns around and starts to oppose israel, it's a major issue, from the perspective of the jews a massive and dangerous betrayal. So they killed him while was widely known as the golden zionist shabbos boy, capitalizing on that and removing a major threat to their propaganda.

And the evidence is also striking. While it came up over time, there are massive issues with blaming that child. There was that *known* jew who distracted the police with his pedophile crap and claimed to be the shooter. Netanyahu posted ~20 minutes before any media reported Kirk's death, with a text that took 5-10 minutes at least to write.

The kooky stuff is irrelevant. But even then, how didn't the bullet pass through his neck, which it should have *easily* penetrated? And how comes his bitch of a wife happily struts around and takes over the company? Who also has a shady past, and seems to be handed to Kirk through his jewish connections in the past?

Anyway, there is plenty of reason to question the official narrative, and to derail it by claiming there are kooky idiocy, therefore it's all disproven is nonsensical.
PurestEvil on scored.co
20 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
I've links to my posts that may be relevant to this topic:

[My Charlie Kirk theory](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1AR0LQZHxw/about-the-charlie-kirk-situation/c)

[Why scientifically speaking niggers are not of the species of "humans"](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZL5tIs/science-niggers-are-not-humans/c)

[About jews - all these mysterious Soviet Spies in the US were jewish communists](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/17txy1v9Sz/soviet-spies/c) - a thick Russian accent would have been a dead giveaway, but they were all communist jewish traitors all along.

[This](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARK54TJi4/what-really-happened-since-the-e/c) is what happened after WWI, and the reason is that Hitler overthrew their [finance system](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARcz4VFDk/the-jewish-finance-system-and-wh/c), which is the most important thing for them. And [this](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARdVyr2JU/the-jews-used-poland-to-provoke-/c) is what triggered WWII - not such poor victims, were they? As if Poland, Britain, France, Soviet Union and the US just wanted peace, and Germany just thought "hey guys, what if we'd conquer the WORLD?"
ScallionPancake on scored.co
20 hours ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
How about he’s just a whiny faggot?
serengetidesert1973 on scored.co
22 hours ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
* Associating with non-white "influencers". Can't blame him for wanting friends, but it's very bottom feeder behavior to do it with the dogshit he does it with.
* Fame going to his head and showing some narcissism.
* The constant ankle biting these faggots do to each other and their constant e-dramas.
* Promoting neo-con bullshit.
* Contradicting himself/switching up and getting on his high horse when he does so. Actually I'm catholic and we think little niglets are a gift from God.
* A lot of his low social status, if your remove the fame, comes through in his opinions and attitudes. You can sense he's insecure and it's off putting.

He's smart but is held back by his original lot in life.
goyberg on scored.co
21 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> Associating with non-white "influencers". Can't blame him for wanting friends, but it's very bottom feeder behavior to do it with the dogshit he does it with.

Yeah, but then he later switches up on most of them like with Sneako.

Steelmanning: I'd say he befriends these guys to demonstrate to the public that he's not the evil racist the media makes him out to be, and when they start showing anti-White sentiments or counter-signaling him, that gives him the justification to counter back and not completely alienate his more racist audience.

Scummy? Maybe. But it works.

Only ones he has now that I know of are Ye, Myron, and that one superchatter who I think livestreams video games.

If I were to come up with a label for it, I would call passive racialism.

> Fame going to his head and showing some narcissism.

Narcissism is inevitable with anyone you see in show-business. I'm adding it to the list, but I don't see it as a meaningful critique.

> The constant ankle biting these faggots do to each other and their constant e-dramas.

That's more of a general critique of every influencer. For any ankle-biting Nick does, I see a lot of people biting his ankles when I go into the replies of any tweet he posts.

> Promoting neo-con bullshit.

Be more clear on this. What did he say that's an example of neo-con bullshit?

> Contradicting himself/switching up and getting on his high horse when he does so. Actually I'm catholic and we think little niglets are a gift from God.

This one, I agree with more so than the rest. There are some cases where he's very consistent, but then there are some cases where he teeter-totters between one view and the opposite.

I think most times, these self-contradictions erupt from trying to balance racial nationalism with Catholicism. Nick is more of a contemporary political analyst than a theologian, so when he starts dipping into how theology relates to White nationalism, I don't expect his depth to be quite as strong.

> A lot of his low social status, if your remove the fame, comes through in his opinions and attitudes. You can sense he's insecure and it's off putting.

That's more of a subjective taste.

Male incels who fail to meet conventional standards of appearance, wealth, social etiquette, etc. find that part of him to be more relatable than trad-cath wife guys who have everything put together.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 hour ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> Narcissism is inevitable with anyone you see in show-business. I'm adding it to the list, but I don't see it as a meaningful critique.

Arrogance is the right word, narcissism not so much. He thinks he is oh-so smarter than everyone else, even opposing his own viewers who idiotically hand him money. And then he dishes out his rather timid views (israel bad, Vance bad, Trump bad, Republicans bad - oh wow, how novel), and utterly feckless action plan (infiltrate governments and corporations, and after decades of dicksucking, peddling faggotry and doing pedophilia, they go mask-off and reveal they were actually based all along). You cannot get into high positions of power and influence without being a proven traitor serving the jews.

Or advocating to vote Democrats to "punish" the Republicans... which literally plays straight into the system of Democracy itself - it has ZERO effect on the system and will lead to no change at all (except negative ones). In fact, it rather reinforces the validity of the system.

> a contemporary political analyst

Yes, that describes him well.
genesisSOC on scored.co
21 hours ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
"Racism is stupid": https://files.catbox.moe/q6iwjd.mp4
TallestSkil on scored.co
22 hours ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
> just about similar motion and media presence

Why would I care about this? Jews control all media and all forms of communication. If I know the name on a national scale, the name is necessarily controlled.
Breadpilled on scored.co
15 hours ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Simplest distillation: He's a civic nationalist, not a White nationalist. If what you ultimately desire is a White supermajority at the exclusion of all nons, then he is not your ally and never will be.

In actual WN spaces, what tips sentiment towards him from apathy into active hostility is the fact that he intentionally markets himself to WN causes and tries to subvert them.
bobbacringo on scored.co
10 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
He's actually a homosexual. Did you miss that? Oh, I'm getting blocked by you for stating the obvious. WOW. So there's no counter to him actually being called out for being a homosexual so you have to block everyone. Which means the only people you will interact with are the remaining ones that do not know that he is a homosexual that fucks men.


What the fuck is a WigNat? Wigger nationalist? Wiggers are absolute garbage. Wiggers need to be ground under tank treads.


Nick Fuentes is a queer that is presented to disaffected white men as a blow off valve to make sure they don't muster. His whole purpose is to keep you online agreeing with him to make sure you never pick up a weapon and stand at post. His counter part is "Handsome Truth" who is a jew that plays as a white supremacist to lead white people down the wrong path.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 hour ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
And don't forget the 2 solutions Fuentes provides:

1. Over decades, have "based" zoomers infiltrate governments and corporations and then take them over from inside. Aka fuck children, be proven traitors, be parasites until you reveal your "true self."

2. Vote Democrats to "punish" Republicans. Which is utterly idiotic. "VOOT HARDER GOY!" essentially.
Webspawner3 on scored.co
18 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
We finally have someone that shares our views that is mainstream. You would think we would support him but I guess not 🤷 Some people on here are just as insufferable as redditors and will never be happy.
bobbacringo on scored.co
10 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Just because you don't understand the whole picture doesn't mean others are insufferable. It means you don't understand the whole picture. Which likely means that you are young and stupid. Which is Nick Fuentes' demographic.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 hour ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Fuentes is a positive force to move the Overton window towards noticing the jew and calling them out... but he is just an intermediate stepping stone to better people. He cannot provide us much of value. To normies however yes.
Toast message