From what I've researched, the factors that contribute to hatred for Nick Fuentes most in the WigNat sphere include the following:
- He's not a racially pure White
- He doesn't exclusively associate with racially pure Whites
- He's Roman Catholic instead of Pagan Norse, Greek, Roman God worshipper
- His aesthetic is Northern City rather than Southern Trad
- He's not married and makes fun of wife guys frequently
Did I miss any?
(Please don't say some variation of gay, spic, mutt, etc., etc. I don't care if you hate him, but if this is how you express your hatred, your IQ is clearly below 80 and I will block you.)
Thought Experiment: Post in the comments if you know anyone with just about similar motion and media presence who meets at least one of these criteria.
It took me one day to create a valid theory. Charlie Kirk was the golden zionist shabbos boy, raking in jewish donor moneys to an extreme degree. And then he started to turn on them, to publicly question them, to call out israel for genociding, for insisting on revealing the Epstein operation, to refuse their invitations.
So while you could say he was just one of many who oppose israel, he had a following of millions of conservatives. So if a former zionist turns around and starts to oppose israel, it's a major issue, from the perspective of the jews a massive and dangerous betrayal. So they killed him while was widely known as the golden zionist shabbos boy, capitalizing on that and removing a major threat to their propaganda.
And the evidence is also striking. While it came up over time, there are massive issues with blaming that child. There was that *known* jew who distracted the police with his pedophile crap and claimed to be the shooter. Netanyahu posted ~20 minutes before any media reported Kirk's death, with a text that took 5-10 minutes at least to write.
The kooky stuff is irrelevant. But even then, how didn't the bullet pass through his neck, which it should have *easily* penetrated? And how comes his bitch of a wife happily struts around and takes over the company? Who also has a shady past, and seems to be handed to Kirk through his jewish connections in the past?
Anyway, there is plenty of reason to question the official narrative, and to derail it by claiming there are kooky idiocy, therefore it's all disproven is nonsensical.