From what I've researched, the factors that contribute to hatred for Nick Fuentes most in the WigNat sphere include the following:
- He's not a racially pure White
- He doesn't exclusively associate with racially pure Whites
- He's Roman Catholic instead of Pagan Norse, Greek, Roman God worshipper
- His aesthetic is Northern City rather than Southern Trad
- He's not married and makes fun of wife guys frequently
Did I miss any?
(Please don't say some variation of gay, spic, mutt, etc., etc. I don't care if you hate him, but if this is how you express your hatred, your IQ is clearly below 80 and I will block you.)
Thought Experiment: Post in the comments if you know anyone with just about similar motion and media presence who meets at least one of these criteria.
Yeah, but then he later switches up on most of them like with Sneako.
Steelmanning: I'd say he befriends these guys to demonstrate to the public that he's not the evil racist the media makes him out to be, and when they start showing anti-White sentiments or counter-signaling him, that gives him the justification to counter back and not completely alienate his more racist audience.
Scummy? Maybe. But it works.
Only ones he has now that I know of are Ye, Myron, and that one superchatter who I think livestreams video games.
If I were to come up with a label for it, I would call passive racialism.
> Fame going to his head and showing some narcissism.
Narcissism is inevitable with anyone you see in show-business. I'm adding it to the list, but I don't see it as a meaningful critique.
> The constant ankle biting these faggots do to each other and their constant e-dramas.
That's more of a general critique of every influencer. For any ankle-biting Nick does, I see a lot of people biting his ankles when I go into the replies of any tweet he posts.
> Promoting neo-con bullshit.
Be more clear on this. What did he say that's an example of neo-con bullshit?
> Contradicting himself/switching up and getting on his high horse when he does so. Actually I'm catholic and we think little niglets are a gift from God.
This one, I agree with more so than the rest. There are some cases where he's very consistent, but then there are some cases where he teeter-totters between one view and the opposite.
I think most times, these self-contradictions erupt from trying to balance racial nationalism with Catholicism. Nick is more of a contemporary political analyst than a theologian, so when he starts dipping into how theology relates to White nationalism, I don't expect his depth to be quite as strong.
> A lot of his low social status, if your remove the fame, comes through in his opinions and attitudes. You can sense he's insecure and it's off putting.
That's more of a subjective taste.
Male incels who fail to meet conventional standards of appearance, wealth, social etiquette, etc. find that part of him to be more relatable than trad-cath wife guys who have everything put together.
Arrogance is the right word, narcissism not so much. He thinks he is oh-so smarter than everyone else, even opposing his own viewers who idiotically hand him money. And then he dishes out his rather timid views (israel bad, Vance bad, Trump bad, Republicans bad - oh wow, how novel), and utterly feckless action plan (infiltrate governments and corporations, and after decades of dicksucking, peddling faggotry and doing pedophilia, they go mask-off and reveal they were actually based all along). You cannot get into high positions of power and influence without being a proven traitor serving the jews.
Or advocating to vote Democrats to "punish" the Republicans... which literally plays straight into the system of Democracy itself - it has ZERO effect on the system and will lead to no change at all (except negative ones). In fact, it rather reinforces the validity of the system.
> a contemporary political analyst
Yes, that describes him well.